[*]The implementation of dynamic structures. I am seriously excited about the implications of this functionality! Imagine a typical freezeout but the levels are eight minutes in length, then 10 minutes once the money is reached, 12 minutes at the final three tables, and 15 minutes at the final table. The ability to lengthen the excitement of going deep in a tournament in a dynamic way has a lot of potential.[/LIST][B]
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoGGz
Need more info!
Well heres my initial request for them from february 2012 http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...&postcount=566
"itd be kinda cool if stars pioneered a new format of mtt where earlygame is all turbo speed and then at the final 3 tables (or 2 tables) it becomes regular speed
this would be a sick format esp if they were cubeds to allow rec players alot of chips to splash around with
lotta play early
doesnt take 6 hours to ft
room and time to play the most interesting fun and important part of the mtt
might take some tweaking but could be a huge hit"
and here is Bryan-PS confirming that stars was already planning on it in oct 2012 http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...postcount=1717
" Having Variable Level Times is something we have planned, and once we have it available to us, I'm sure that we'll run some tournaments similar to what you describe."
i emailed stars but still waiting for a reply.. what happens if you already are in? pretty messed up to have a dep bonus only to people who havent qualified
In b4 more NLO8! Preferrable hypers or turbos. Current schedule during European evening is still very poor.
44$ turbo NLO8 added is ok, 82$ hyper NLO8 is ok, add both and it's great. Reason why NLO8 is NOT thriving is the poor offering (especially during European evening), not that people wouldn't want to play NLO8 tournaments.
Also weekly NLO8 hyper or turbo with some 109$ buy-in would be a great addition, let's say like PLO8 turbo in Saturdays around 22:00 CET and NLO8 hyper in Sundays around 23:00 CET.
When you cash a bounty builder and get the email after it doesn't say how much you actually cashed for just the bounty amount.
LOL hardly a brag cashing a mtt just saying seems to be a bug
Only when u win the battle royal seat it seems. Checked some others when just min cashed and it said it then.
PokerStars Tournament #1444905721, No Limit Hold'em
Super Satellite
Buy-In: $100.00/$100.00/$15.00 USD
401 players
Total Prize Pool: $80200.00 USD
Target Tournament #1444905621 Buy-In: $109.00 USD
9 tickets to the target tournament
Tournament started 2016/01/21 15:15:00 WET [2016/01/21 10:15:00 ET]
Dear x
You finished the tournament in 5th place.
This qualifies you for a seat in Tournament #1444905621. A ticket to this tournament was issued in your name. You can use this ticket to register. See Tournament #1444905621 Lobby for further details.
You have also received USD x in Knockout Bounties for this tournament. You won bounties for the following players:
Last edited by U shove i call; 01-21-2016 at 09:17 PM.
As a sorry for all ur blunders can u reaadd the minis the Sunday. Just write them in red and don't even put a garubtee just call it Sunday mini anything and we will accept ur apology.
started my session late today, i got 9 tabbles 7 of them turbo, i get its the time most ppl r finishing them, i'm just asking for my 109 2r 1a that used to start right now and i'd have a nice deep tournament with a small field to be excited about. The only decent stuff is big162 that i regged with 12bbs
1. Any change to the register more than one 180 man registering for each stake? Such as the 15s, 8s and 3.50rebuys. If you could register for more than one $15, $8 and $3.50 at once, im sure there would be much more games going on. As of now, rarely are there many 15s running even at peak time. Thus the only 180 man that registers very fast are the 3.50 rebuys. And as you know, 35s almost never go at all.
2. How much a $22 180 man turbo since many players don't play the 35s? Its a bit higher than the $15 and lower than the $35. Thus good chance games could take off with these? Also how long has those $22 180 mans nonturbos been removed from stars? I recalled back then they had these. Is there a reason there isn't any of these and the only nonturbo 180 mans are the 4.50s? Many ppl wouldn't bother with the 4.50s as its very low stakes.
3. Any chance of having the same 180 mans but instead of 180 mans... make it 500 player cap? Maybe possibly 1000 player cap? Of course you could say these would be regular turbo tournaments. But i think a 500 player cap of these would be another idea? You probably would have to pay top 50 or so but make the top prizes just like the 180 mans?
1. Games will go off even slower than before, there's no reason to do this.
2. 15s barely run anymore, why add even higher?
3. This would probably kill the format completely except at microstakes.
Yes, liquidity is key. Part of what makes 180s appealing to casual players is they load quickly. If you added more lobbies, or upped the player cap, it would frustrate many casual players because they would take longer to load. I thought it would be cool to make them On Demand, launching when 180 players register but leave registration open for 15 minutes or a 360 player cap, but I think that would just make the games tougher tbh. I could be wrong, though.
seriously....doesn't need that many heads to figure out that having 1.10 BB and .55BB within one hour of each is just brainless, and then wonder why there are lags - if the microstakes are really so important to you, BRING BACK micromillions!!!
1. Any change to the register more than one 180 man registering for each stake? Such as the 15s, 8s and 3.50rebuys. If you could register for more than one $15, $8 and $3.50 at once, im sure there would be much more games going on. As of now, rarely are there many 15s running even at peak time. Thus the only 180 man that registers very fast are the 3.50 rebuys. And as you know, 35s almost never go at all.
2. How much a $22 180 man turbo since many players don't play the 35s? Its a bit higher than the $15 and lower than the $35. Thus good chance games could take off with these? Also how long has those $22 180 mans nonturbos been removed from stars? I recalled back then they had these. Is there a reason there isn't any of these and the only nonturbo 180 mans are the 4.50s? Many ppl wouldn't bother with the 4.50s as its very low stakes.
3. Any chance of having the same 180 mans but instead of 180 mans... make it 500 player cap? Maybe possibly 1000 player cap? Of course you could say these would be regular turbo tournaments. But i think a 500 player cap of these would be another idea? You probably would have to pay top 50 or so but make the top prizes just like the 180 mans?