Quote:
Originally Posted by sketchy1
having a true alternate system + more tables + evening out registration across the days before the morning of the event = this **** won't happen in the future.
for whatever reason they decided to remove alternates like a year or two ago and now this happens. it ends up being preferential treatment in the end when diamond club members/known players bitch and they wind up getting seats of players who registered but didn't show up. it's not fair and it definitely isn't in the spirit of what the WSOP was at one time (IMO).
One of the MANY MANY contradictions / outright lies they told us today was "we didn't do alternates because we have never done them." I heard this at least seven times today.
-We can't do alternates because we've never done them
-We can't sit ten handed because it's not fair
-We can't do a day 1-E because of 'operational difficulties'
My response to the alternates quote was:
1. That's an outright lie
2. You've also never said that there were 3k seats, and then only sold 2.7k. You've also never played some groups through 4 levels and some through 5. You've also never TURNED AWAY PLAYERS FROM THE WSOP MAIN EVENT. Since when does a (nonexistent) precedent mean that you absolutely can't do something even if you should?
I was ignored.