what about antes in turbos steve

what about reducing time to act or reducing timebank steve?

Hi Baard,

It has been almost one month since the NLO8 hypers were implemented at the $1.50, $3.50 and $7.00 levels and they seem to have taken off.

Seeing how the current PLO hypers are offered at $1.50, $3.50, $7.00, $15.00, $30.00 and $100.00 (and the ability to register for 3 tournaments at a time for all except the $100), do you think it's time to have similar offerings for the NLO8 variant?

I am confident that these will do well if offered at a $15 and $30 buyin and it doesn't hurt to have a $100 "high roller" one in there for those that want to play it. The $100 will not impact in liquidity of the games in any way, as the players who currently want to play this high are not playing the $7s long term anyways.

I'm sure others share the same sentiment that I do. If you need others to come in and express this, I'll be happy to get some O8 regulars to come in. The bottom line is, these games by far been more popular than PLO as PLO is more popular in a cash game format.

Thanks for reading!

b and 2 pls, or 1 with a turn off notification button.

+1 broken_jia

+1

Adding at least $15 and $30 buyin would be really nice!

I dont like PLO but would play FR O8 hypers.

agree with this higher levels of hyper O8 are needed, I would definitely play them.

i am pretty sure the ability to register at 3 tourneys of one buyin level would push the amount of o8-hypers played even further.

additional i am really missing the higher buyin levels. i even had to start playing PLO hypers because of that, which i d rather not (playing plo and nlo8 multitable can get pretty confusing).

yesterday i played 174 hypers of PLO and 162 hypers of nlO8. i always registered for ALL 7$ and 15$ buyin tourneys available and some 3,5$. so i get a lousy 12 PLO tourneys more even though i did register on 6! tourneys similar.
comparing PLO-hypers and nlO8-hypers it´s obvious the PLO-hypers are the sucker, barely able to compete, even with desperate o8 players grinding them. and still THEY get the higher buyins and THEY can register to more tourneys.

wtf is wrong with O8, why do we get treated like a ***** ugly insect hiding under a stone?

I'd probably play some NLO8 hypers as well, if I can manage to understand what 4 cards means

+1

any word on 60$ 9man or 300$ 6man hyper baard?

+1. The micro stakes are very popular - pretty sure that higher buy ins would be very popular too.

Cheers,
Bob

Yeah the O8 6m hypers are very fun. Still not sure wether I'm a fish in them or not, but I feel like I'm learning.

I feel like $60 9m hypers would be fun

I will be taking all my business to your competitor when they reopen if you dont add 60/9m hypers.

competitorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

hahahaha competitor

Will there even be sng traffic with rakeback capped at 25%?

^^ 30% but again...

+1

Recreational players are very knowledgeable of rakeback these days.

^
Yep, and 25%>>>bronze/silver star.

its not flat 25%.. you still need to rake 1k/month to get it, so casuals will have to settle for 10% or whatever you get at non-diamond status

http://www.fulltiltpoker.com/edge though you can add like 3-5% to it from points buying bonuses, and maybe some extra from happy hours and sng leaderboards. So i would recon regs will get like 32-35%

Oh, well that sucks.

I never played on Tilt. They had higher rake on SNGs also from what I've read OTF. Is this true?