Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** *** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread ***

01-21-2013 , 12:02 PM
wow so only 3r got moved from mtt lobby? wtf lol thats lame
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 12:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerStars Baard



Development of automatic deal-making functionality has been raised in priority as a result of the last player meetings. When this becomes available and is fully tested, we will deploy it for 180s. I do not currently have an estimate of when it will be available, as sometimes plans change and other times development doesn't complete on schedule.



Quote:
I have now deployed this structure to all the Turbo 180s


Quote:
In addition, we will start preparing the transition to 15% payouts in the SNG MTT s. I will make an initial proposal for new payout structures here sometime this week, and then we can hopefully have a constructive discussion and end up with a result that is acceptable for most of you.


Although can you please clarify specifically which SNG MTT's you're talking about here?

Just 180's? Just turbo's? Or reg speed 180's too?

Any tweak to 90's? (obviously 45's are already 15%)

Last edited by Langerdang; 01-21-2013 at 12:23 PM.
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 12:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Langerdang
Although can you please clarify specifically which SNG MTT's you're talking about here?
We'll look at all SNG MTT's, but what the final result will be is not 100% certain. I will post some initial proposals sometime this week.

Baard
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 12:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerStars Baard
Finally, as we have announced previously, we are going to remove the $3.50+R tournament from the Tourney -> All lobby. The change will probably already have taken place as you read this. I understand that this change will not be pleasing to many regulars, but we are going to move forward and see how it goes.
Baard,

Most players have made it clear that they didn't want to see this, but your choice of words suggests that it is still, at least in name, only a trial, and not (yet) a permanent change.

"...see how it goes" further suggests that there are some outcomes expected from this change, so what are the criteria you will be using to decide whether or not it has been a success? And what timeframe are you allowing before considering results against those criteria, so that we, as players, can all come back at that date and see if we're going to get them back again?

If those criteria and a timeframe don't exist then this is either:-
a) a poor (and arbitrary) decision
b) a charade to mask the predetermined permanence of your decision, where you'll hope we're just going forget about it as time goes by.


TT
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 01:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeamTrousers
Baard,

Most players have made it clear that they didn't want to see this, but your choice of words suggests that it is still, at least in name, only a trial, and not (yet) a permanent change.

"...see how it goes" further suggests that there are some outcomes expected from this change, so what are the criteria you will be using to decide whether or not it has been a success? And what timeframe are you allowing before considering results against those criteria, so that we, as players, can all come back at that date and see if we're going to get them back again?

If those criteria and a timeframe don't exist then this is either:-
a) a poor (and arbitrary) decision
b) a charade to mask the predetermined permanence of your decision, where you'll hope we're just going forget about it as time goes by.


TT

This move really upset me tbh, Pokerstars. I don't think a single player wanted this change, and the lobby still looks like **** with 20 hypers satties bouncing around. Why not allow only 1 or 2 hypers satties per MTT and keep the rest "on deck" tucked away in the SNG > Satellite. When regs come in and register for 10 at once, thats much more of an eyesore than one single 3r that pops off every 2-5 minutes. Is that how you guys are going to run things now? Asking for opinions but then doing whatever you want anyway...

Last edited by burnJa; 01-21-2013 at 01:36 PM.
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 01:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by burnJa
This move really upset me tbh, Pokerstars. I don't think a single player wanted this change, and the lobby still looks like **** with 20 hypers satties bouncing around. Why not allow only 1 or 2 hypers satties per MTT and keep the rest "on deck" tucked away in the SNG > Satellite. When regs come in and register for 10 at once, thats much more of an eyesore than one single 3r that pops off every 2-5 minutes. Is that how you guys are going to run things now? Asking for opinions but then doing whatever you want anyway...
Couldn agree more !
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 03:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by burnJa
This move really upset me tbh, Pokerstars. I don't think a single player wanted this change, and the lobby still looks like **** with 20 hypers satties bouncing around. Why not allow only 1 or 2 hypers satties per MTT and keep the rest "on deck" tucked away in the SNG > Satellite. When regs come in and register for 10 at once, thats much more of an eyesore than one single 3r that pops off every 2-5 minutes. Is that how you guys are going to run things now? Asking for opinions but then doing whatever you want anyway...
This
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 04:27 PM
Paying 15% of sng mtt fields is a horrible move by Stars. If anything it needed to be changed to 5%.
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 04:31 PM
How much longer has the new blind levels in 180s added to the total game play running time?
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 04:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vera De Milo
Paying 15% of sng mtt fields is a horrible move by Stars. If anything it needed to be changed to 5%.
lol

Quote:
Originally Posted by OditeRussia
How much longer has the new blind levels in 180s added to the total game play running time?
while you mentioned, wanted to check it out in my HEM, basically nothing has changed in this month, same avg.duration on 8s and 15s over 500 games sample on both
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 05:46 PM
ya, if anything, it will only add another 3 minutes? 5 minutes? I forgot how long the levels were in those things
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 05:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vera De Milo
Paying 15% of sng mtt fields is a horrible move by Stars. If anything it needed to be changed to 5%.
The 15% structure will be great for a lot reasons which I am too lazy to list.

Please explain why 5% makes any sence...lol

Last edited by Andrew23122; 01-21-2013 at 05:58 PM.
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 05:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Stefanello
while you mentioned, wanted to check it out in my HEM, basically nothing has changed in this month, same avg.duration on 8s and 15s over 500 games sample on both
This is because the change that they made was to the later stages of the FO 180s which barely effects the average duration. This also means that it doesn't effect the rake, therefore making it an easy change for Stars. Everyone is happy!

Last edited by Andrew23122; 01-21-2013 at 06:04 PM.
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 06:11 PM
so where do i find them now
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 06:25 PM
SNGs shouldn't appear in the MTT lobby, there is a SNG lobby for a reason, which is why I wasn't vocally opposed to the removal of 3rs. But if other SNGs are going to remain there and the lobby will remain a cluster*** of random STT satelites and other nonsense then it's obvious Stars are just using the MTT lobby as a shop window to promote the games they want people playing. Rebuys are terrible rake generators, hence the removal of $3rs.
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 07:44 PM
I think, at the very least, the 3r should be included in the Tourney > Regular > All tab along with all the other 180s
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 07:54 PM
Why no 2.5k level in $3.5r 180s?
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 08:00 PM
so we still have all regular sngs in tournaments > regular except 3r. What's the point, can anyone enlighten me.
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 08:04 PM
Rake - stars. wants. moarrrr.
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 08:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChAAnt JC
Why no 2.5k level in $3.5r 180s?
Same reason they took it from tournament lobby. They don't want to encourage people to play them.
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 08:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerStars Baard
Hello all,

I have looked through the posts that have been made since my last Q&A here, and I’ve made some comments below.



Development of automatic deal-making functionality has been raised in priority as a result of the last player meetings. When this becomes available and is fully tested, we will deploy it for 180s. I do not currently have an estimate of when it will be available, as sometimes plans change and other times development doesn't complete on schedule.



We are not planning to deploy more rebuy tournaments at this time.



I have now deployed this structure to all the Turbo 180s

In addition, we will start preparing the transition to 15% payouts in the SNG MTT s. I will make an initial proposal for new payout structures here sometime this week, and then we can hopefully have a constructive discussion and end up with a result that is acceptable for most of you.

Finally, as we have announced previously, we are going to remove the $3.50+R tournament from the Tourney -> All lobby. The change will probably already have taken place as you read this. I understand that this change will not be pleasing to many regulars, but we are going to move forward and see how it goes.
Are you going to pretend there's a reason for removing 3rs other than the lack of rake or just ignroe the question. Just interested if you guys have come up with a fake reason for us to laugh at or not. When you say "see how it goes" you surely have to at least tell us what you're looking for to decide if it's a positive change or not?

Also there is no 1.25 / 2.5k blind level in the 3rs. Get your facts straight
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 09:00 PM
also, 15% payout structure is going to be awful
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 09:01 PM
bad move stars, bad move
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 09:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mentality135
Also there is no 1.25 / 2.5k blind level in the 3rs. Get your facts straight
The rebuy tournament is different from the other 180s in that there are a lot more chips in rotation. This means that there is less need for the extra level in that specific tournament.

Thanks,
Baard
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
01-21-2013 , 09:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerStars Baard
The rebuy tournament is different from the other 180s in that there are a lot more chips in rotation. This means that there is less need for the extra level in that specific tournament.

Thanks,
Baard
This at least makes some sense, as it's not going to be at or near the FT, but in that case the 3.50rs would benefit from a 12.5k/25k level instead of jumping straight to 15k/30k. It's exactly the same 50% jump so the same reasons to smooth it out should apply imo.


Any answer for us yet on the success/failure criteria for the "trial" of removing them from the MTT lobby though?
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote

      
m