Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** ***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW***

01-31-2012 , 08:11 PM
1k swings in the 2s is disgusting!! They gift you money in them sick swing though mate
***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
01-31-2012 , 10:03 PM
ireallyhaterivers


Spoiler:


Last edited by joseracer; 01-31-2012 at 10:05 PM. Reason: bored random TS, enjoy. Also hate stragersucker
***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
01-31-2012 , 10:48 PM
heres to a 5k february...

***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
01-31-2012 , 11:05 PM
Why do you guys think it's a good idea to out regs who play sub-optimally?

If someone makes -$EV calls vs you at FT's (which yes, can at times hurt your equity), then guess what, they probably make them vs other people too. They probably have a bunch of things that they could imrpove in their game. Think of those awesome times when you fold BTN and they hand you piles of equity by spiting some other scrub bvb.

In general, highlighting the mistakes of someone who you think is bad and giving them the opportunity and motivation to improve can't be good for your game or the games in general. If you're worried about losing equity, don't post about it at all.
***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
01-31-2012 , 11:08 PM
Cause its cheaper than a shrink?
And this thread is all about love.
Spoiler:

Last edited by joseracer; 01-31-2012 at 11:16 PM. Reason: yeah, still bored.
***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
01-31-2012 , 11:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt_88
I came back from almost a 1k downswing at the 2s, so anything is possible.
Oh man, graph please. I need it for inspiration.
***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
01-31-2012 , 11:45 PM
Well, said reg killed my equity (in absolute terms) more than I expect he will ever increase my equity by making stupid spite calls vs other regs in the future. Plus I like complaining, a lot.
***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
02-01-2012 , 03:15 AM
i spite call : D
***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
02-01-2012 , 03:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fernythrills
Why do you guys think it's a good idea to out regs who play sub-optimally?

If someone makes -$EV calls vs you at FT's (which yes, can at times hurt your equity), then guess what, they probably make them vs other people too. They probably have a bunch of things that they could imrpove in their game. Think of those awesome times when you fold BTN and they hand you piles of equity by spiting some other scrub bvb.

In general, highlighting the mistakes of someone who you think is bad and giving them the opportunity and motivation to improve can't be good for your game or the games in general. If you're worried about losing equity, don't post about it at all.
nice post sir
***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
02-01-2012 , 04:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt_88
I came back from almost a 1k downswing at the 2s, so anything is possible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Downrock
Oh man, graph please. I need it for inspiration.
obv there should be LOT of leaks if u have 1k "downswing" in 2.2s/2.5s, just checked your graph and that "downswing" was when you started to play, so I wouldn`t call it standard downswing
***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
02-01-2012 , 09:58 AM
I was already a winning player, although not a very big winner, over a 2k+ sample before I went through that downswing. I just started a staking/coaching deal right at the time when that downswing started so during that time my game actually improved but my results plummeted.
***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
02-01-2012 , 11:26 AM
2k sample is tiny.

Keep playing it will turn around eventually.

Spoiler:
***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
02-01-2012 , 02:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt_88
I was already a winning player, although not a very big winner, over a 2k+ sample before I went through that downswing. I just started a staking/coaching deal right at the time when that downswing started so during that time my game actually improved but my results plummeted.
Similar for me in that I feel I vastly improved my game and then proceeded to not be able to win a single hand with <30 players left in the game. This resulted in a plummet of about ~300 BI in ~700 games. There were days where shoving every single hand all in from the start of the tourney probably would have produced better results than I was getting.

I don't doubt I have leaks but I REALLY hope my leaks aren't bad enough to make dropping 300 BI in 700 games normal.
***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
02-01-2012 , 02:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zebkiwi
D_DIGGLER, or something like that, thats a pretty decent downswing..
I'd say he has a very high variance style of play, but I've looked at his graph before and remember being surprised how mellow it is...kid's never had more than like a 3k swing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Downrock
Oh man, graph please. I need it for inspiration.
yes, plz plz

Quote:
Originally Posted by Downrock
I don't doubt I have leaks but I REALLY hope my leaks aren't bad enough to make dropping 300 BI in 700 games normal.
"normal" is a bit relative...but I mean I'd say there's a 5-10% chance that you experience something like this on a monthly basis.

There are variance calculators that you plug in field size, ROI, and some other stuff and it'll spit out probabilities of having sizeable downswings. I'm playing with one found on 2p2 and not sure if I'm doing it right but it has max downswings at ~500

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/61...lator-1019988/
***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
02-01-2012 , 02:33 PM
~500 at 2.50s?
***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
02-01-2012 , 04:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camzace
The graph of the "reg" in question:



Don't think he qualifies anyway, preante spots lol

Also Joseracer got the reg right. That spot certainly changed how I view his play.
I dont appreciate you posting my graph. Thanks.


edit: People should talk more to me while I'm playing, I get bored. START RESPONDING TO ME WHEN I SAY HI

Last edited by hsuman; 02-01-2012 at 04:44 PM. Reason: didnt' want to double post
***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
02-01-2012 , 06:17 PM
500BI downswings at 2.50s are just not gonna happen. Literally must be leaks + run bad because there is no way you are playing optimally whilst on a 500BI swing.
Just my opinion
***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
02-01-2012 , 06:52 PM
I filtered out the downswing so its better visible.

***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
02-01-2012 , 07:14 PM
If that is from when you first started playing then it is more likely. Just because you are learning the games so you are unlikely to be a winner and then you probably hit some bad times etc

All in all who cares cause you are winning now =] downswing's are always fun to look at when they are behind you!
***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
02-01-2012 , 08:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Klinkz
500BI downswings at 2.50s are just not gonna happen. Literally must be leaks + run bad because there is no way you are playing optimally whilst on a 500BI swing.
Just my opinion
I agree, a winning regular from 8/15 just cant have never ever 500 downswing @ 2,5
***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
02-01-2012 , 08:06 PM
hello
***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
02-01-2012 , 08:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vicksmydawg
hello


***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
02-01-2012 , 08:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Klinkz
If that is from when you first started playing then it is more likely. Just because you are learning the games so you are unlikely to be a winner and then you probably hit some bad times etc

All in all who cares cause you are winning now =] downswing's are always fun to look at when they are behind you!
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt_88
I was already a winning player, although not a very big winner, over a 2k+ sample before I went through that downswing. I just started a staking/coaching deal right at the time when that downswing started so during that time my game actually improved but my results plummeted.
.
***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
02-01-2012 , 08:28 PM
Ahh who cares. Maybe they do happen but I'm not one to believe they do (maybe i'm naive). All that matters is that you aren't on that swing any more and you know that you can get through them again if you go on any kind of swing again.

***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote
02-01-2012 , 09:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Klinkz
Ahh who cares. Maybe they do happen but I'm not one to believe they do (maybe i'm naive). All that matters is that you aren't on that swing any more and you know that you can get through them again if you go on any kind of swing again.

ModzillaPL comes to mind. He was considered a pretty solid 2.50 grinder. I think hes got at least 1 near 400 BI, maybe not a 500. Not trying to justify anything here but it's just an example.
***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW*** Quote

      
m