Hi guys
i want share with u my result after 1 years .
Pro player can u tell me about my result ?
GOOD ? BAD ? AVERAGE?
i start with 100$ bankroll last year and in 2-3 month play just 2-5 tourny in per day ...

now i adjust my bankroll for 300 buy in . is that ok or must change it ?
what u think about to play in high stack ?
is that ok for me ?
any advice ?
u can check my result in sharkscoope
https://www.sharkscope.com/#Player-S...ers/babikhatar

ty ty ty

very impressive for your first year
300 buy in sounds plenty.

What is your suggestion ?
200 buy in or less ?

The results are great, possibly as good as they can be.

Your sample size is decent, but it's still small enough for you to have ran hot. Filtering your results, I see that half of your profit derives from MTTs with a buy in more than $100. That's only 150 MTTs out of 3100. You have definitely ran hot on those.

I think the fact you are beating only 47% of the field is a red flag. I don't think I 've seen a long term winner not beating at least 50% of the field. If you are taking EV+ decisions you should be beating more than half of the field right? Maybe you take -EV decisions early on and build huge stacks and maybe that's an exceptional style that can work for you. Maybe.

All in all, if I were you I would still not be sure whether you ran hot or whether they reflect your true ability. On this score, your own self-assessment or that of a third person you trust would be more instructive. Do you see other people make mistakes? Do you feel you win without running exceptionally well in crucial spots?

Regardless, show as much restrain as possible. Don't operate under the assumption that these results will continue, don't spend the money like you think they will, keep a humongous bankroll that will withstand a downswing you haven't experienced yet (start with 1000 bi) don't play as many buy ins in high stakes unless you feel you are truly better than the field. On that score, remember, just as as easily as you won on the high stake MTTs, you can easily go on a downswing on them that will negate all your winnings in midstakes.

Good luck.

Ty sir for your advice
Very usefull

Yeah, being overrolled is always good, although I feel like 1000 BI might be erring on the side of caution more than necessary. (Then again, it might not.)

I keep a 100-buyin minimum for the *highest* tournaments I regularly want to play, and I'm not shy about playing smaller ones, so I probably have something like 300-350x my average buyin in my bankroll. (I may increase that ratio when I get to the point where I'm playing larger tournaments more regularly, because I expect tougher fields and thus a lower ROI.)

I'll also take the occasional shot at a slightly bigger tournament (like a $55 if I'm rolled for $33s) if it's a big-guarantee weekly one with a significant number of satellite entrants, because long term my ROI is higher in those, and you have to give yourself a chance to win big sometimes.

Other than that, your results look pretty good. Set aside enough living expenses to last a while, play within your bankroll's means, don't burn through money, keep studying and learning, and I imagine you'll be fine. Always hard to say how much of success is variance, but if you feel good about the caliber of your play, and you're studying problem spots and always working to improve your game, then I think you can be more confident in your results.

Pretty sick results well done.. But you are running good and a 3k sample size is nothing.

Oh my God, this really was a sad graph to see after his initial successes: https://www.sharkscope.com/#Player-S...ers/babikhatar A reminder about the variance in the games though and/or how easy you can loose profits from lower BI-levels if you start using them on higher BI-tourneys (it seems that is what happened after he hit a few very good scores at the middle of the graph)

(Going backwards in the forum, looking for interesting post if someone is curious about why I'm bumping some old threads)

He might have stopped playing tournaments (although I have no idea why he would). ACR cash is kinda brutal imo, especially the 6 max.

If this post was in BBV (where it probably belonged,) the obvious response would have been "LOL sample size."

$0 to $75k in 3500 games. $75k to minus $25k in 3500 more. Sigh.

It is sad to see the return to the mean take place in so graphic a fashion.

There you were thinking you had skills, but you were just running good, and now it is over.

We all know that feeling you get when everything that was working so well suddenly turns into ashes.

I'm practicing starting hands with a deck, have done so for some time. Have seen cold decks. Normal decks. Today something extraordinary happened. High pair after high pair after high pair. 6% probability for getting a pair? Sure.

lol I see the early posts in here and look at the graph and he's down 15k. Really though he had some big scores relative to his ABI so it's not too shocking he shot up then came back down.