Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
BvB in 2r FT BvB in 2r FT

03-04-2015 , 09:05 AM
Hi guys!

This is obv a huge cooler, but does anyone play differently considering ICM? this is FT of 2$ turbo rebuy and payouts are...

1st 1.6k
2nd 1.1k
3rd 866
4th 650
5th 456
6th 365
7th 275
8th 185

If we didn't cover villain things would be little different, but we do with ok margin so he really can't call without the toppest of his range. Villain was playing 23/21/7.3 3b in 79 hands and has 59% steal from sb. Very limited sample, but what I had seen so far he was playing quite good and used the same sizing from every pos.

    Poker Stars, $2 Buy-in (60,000/120,000 blinds, 15,000 ante) No Limit Hold'em Tournament, 8 Players
    Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite. View Hand #35344861

    CO: 1,881,146 (15.7 bb)
    BTN: 1,175,989 (9.8 bb)
    SB: 2,020,864 (16.8 bb)
    Hero (BB): 2,535,044 (21.1 bb)
    UTG+2: 1,836,866 (15.3 bb)
    MP1: 1,213,123 (10.1 bb)
    MP2: 302,530 (2.5 bb)
    MP3: 776,438 (6.5 bb)

    Preflop: Hero is BB with A K
    6 folds, SB raises to 249,600, Hero raises to 2,520,044 and is all-in, SB calls 1,756,264 and is all-in

    Flop: (4,131,728) T 4 8 (2 players, 2 are all-in)
    Turn: (4,131,728) 5 (2 players, 2 are all-in)
    River: (4,131,728) 8 (2 players, 2 are all-in)

    Spoiler:
    Results: 4,131,728 pot
    Final Board: T 4 8 5 8
    SB showed K K and won 4,131,728 (2,110,864 net)
    Hero showed A K and lost (-2,020,864 net)



    Get the Flash Player to use the Hold'em Manager Replayer.



    converter acted funny and I couldn't remove the results. Sry.
    BvB in 2r FT Quote
    03-04-2015 , 02:43 PM
    no never
    BvB in 2r FT Quote
    03-04-2015 , 04:16 PM
    I wouldn't play it differently. I actually love this spot because as the big stack we should be perceived to be putting a toooon of pressure on this 2nd-place stack given his ICM considerations. I think he can call off with AQ and we can double here, which puts us in a position to just destroy the table and all but ensure finishing either 1 or 2.

    I don't know much about ICM, so take my advice with a grain of salt.
    BvB in 2r FT Quote
    03-04-2015 , 07:52 PM
    std yo
    BvB in 2r FT Quote
    03-04-2015 , 08:50 PM
    I play it the same way
    BvB in 2r FT Quote
    03-05-2015 , 12:11 AM
    Cooler
    BvB in 2r FT Quote
    03-05-2015 , 01:13 AM
    No other option here
    BvB in 2r FT Quote
    03-05-2015 , 02:03 AM
    idk, 3b/c looks pretty good to me. seems like a good spot to 3b insanely wide if hes not gonna be jamming wide. even if you are "wrong" you are at the top of your range
    BvB in 2r FT Quote
    03-05-2015 , 02:07 AM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by gamboneee
    idk, 3b/c looks pretty good to me. seems like a good spot to 3b insanely wide if hes not gonna be jamming wide. even if you are "wrong" you are at the top of your range
    I thought about that too, but I actually think a 3bet looks just as strong here if not stronger than jamming. cuz I mean the lowest we can go with a 3bet is like 600k which basically commits us given V's stack.
    BvB in 2r FT Quote
    03-05-2015 , 11:01 AM
    3-betting looks stronger, yes. But any folds from pairs is a mistake from villain, so I think 3-bet is better, but not big difference.
    BvB in 2r FT Quote
    03-05-2015 , 08:58 PM
    GII.
    BvB in 2r FT Quote
    03-05-2015 , 10:56 PM
    Uber standard. Just unlucky.

    3b/c is also worth considering, but taking the pot down pre is pretty huge considering all the stacksizes, and you can force him to fold a lot of hands that have decent equity against you.
    BvB in 2r FT Quote

          
    m