[OFFICIAL] Beginner/Basic Question Thread - Page 30 - MTT Poker Strategy

Two Plus Two Forums Poker Strategy No Limit Tournaments

[OFFICIAL] Beginner/Basic Question Thread

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 30 of 100

First

10 20 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 40 50 80

Last

Page 30 of 100

First

10 20 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 40 50 80

Last

12-22-2010 , 02:04 PM

#726

Nuca-Cola

enthusiast

Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 60

How Ok (or not Ok) is it to be breakeven after about 200 SNGs? I mean I know it's not ok, but can it be variance or I just suck?
I'm talking about 2$ FT sngs.

Last edited by Nuca-Cola; 12-22-2010 at 02:19 PM.

Quote

150% up to $2,000 Welcome Bonus on CoinPoker

Join the action now

Daily Rewards ? Splash Pots ? CoinRaces

12-22-2010 , 02:54 PM

#727

waar

journeyman

Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 375

200 SNGs is not a significant sample at all

Quote

12-22-2010 , 03:56 PM

#728

epix-

adept

Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 1,066

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nuca-Cola

How Ok (or not Ok) is it to be breakeven after about 200 SNGs? I mean I know it's not ok, but can it be variance or I just suck?
I'm talking about 2$ FT sngs.

i think its ok to start out breakeven, while still learning the techniques to beat sngs. 200 isnt a big sample and you have for sure tons of spots where you can improve so go and learn

Quote

12-22-2010 , 09:28 PM

#729

Macismom21

banned

Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 460

Anyone know how many of these percentages are wrong in HEM? I know there are atleast a few I have found that are incorrect. Anyone know how many there are and if/when HEM will fix this? Thanks, I searched but could not find a complete list of all of them.

Quote

12-23-2010 , 01:29 AM

#730

waar

journeyman

Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 375

Okay forgive me if I'm missing something or if I'm being ******ed here for whatever reason, but when comparing the $22+2 turbo STT on FTP and the $15+1 PokerStars equivalent, it occurred to me that the rake on the PS game is 25% less than the FTP game. If FTP had a $15 game that kept the sam rake% as all of the other turbo STT's, the game would be a $15+1.33 buyin, and with 27% rakeback the rake would effectively be $0.97. So by playing the Stars game as opposed to the $22+2 on FTP, even before VIP bonuses you are getting almost (27% vs 25%) the same rakeback as FTP in the form of lower rake. Please someone tell me if I'm missing something crucial here...

Quote

12-23-2010 , 02:15 PM

#731

FILIPPO_INZAGHI

journeyman

Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 223

Is it just me, or are there no 9man (or 6m fwiw) non turbo SNGs at FTP over 10$ now? Have tried to find them with and without filtering, but I just can't find anything, except pot limit.

Quote

12-24-2010 , 02:50 AM

#732

epix-

adept

Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 1,066

macismom:
didnt use hem alot yet but the percentages in the handreplayer are total crap.

waar:
i would also like a better rake structure for ftp turbo/non turbo. if i look at super turbo structure the rake gets a little bit lower the higher you play, which encourages people to move up. right now im on the 6+0.5 and moving up to 11+1 increases rake paid (percentages)

flippo:
there are all sorts of games over 10$ nonturbo 6/9 man. maybe you looked a bit

Quote

12-24-2010 , 09:36 AM

#733

FILIPPO_INZAGHI

journeyman

Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 223

Yeah found them, but they were gone some hours after the system maintenance yesterday

Quote

12-24-2010 , 07:51 PM

#734

Macismom21

banned

Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 460

Quote:

Originally Posted by epix-

I look at the equities during my review sessions. The ones I'm worried about are the post flop equities. Anyone find any that are correct preflop but incorrect postflop? The preflop ones are easily spotted. If anyone knows of a list, or knows if the postflop equities are incorrect, please let me know.

Quote

12-26-2010 , 12:25 PM

#735

MetalSpork

old hand

Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1,294

Quote:

Originally Posted by Macismom21

pokerstove

Quote

12-26-2010 , 09:29 PM

#736

Macismom21

banned

Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 460

I have pokerstove, be able to accomplish a lot more in the same time frame if I just knew which ones were correct. I can pull wiz up from HEM and would just bew more efficient. If anyone has a link to a list please post.

Quote

12-26-2010 , 09:55 PM

#737

MetalSpork

old hand

Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1,294

But you said the ranges are wrong, and someone else agreed... But that's all I got

Last edited by MetalSpork; 12-26-2010 at 09:56 PM. Reason: doubt anyone knows which are good n bad

Quote

12-27-2010 , 08:59 AM

#738

Macismom21

banned

Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 460

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetalSpork

But you said the ranges are wrong, and someone else agreed... But that's all I got

I see. Most are correct, I've only found a couple. If I can get a list, it would make my review sessions a bit more efficient. Thanks for the post though. One thing that may help, is there a script to load hands in Pokerstove?

Quote

12-27-2010 , 09:36 AM

#739

MetalSpork

old hand

Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1,294

I'd like to think someone has made that script/software. I'd ask in the software and possibly mid/high stakes cash forums.

Edit: It's poss a few ppl have made one but not thought to share it.

Quote

12-27-2010 , 06:44 PM

#740

marl118

centurion

Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 152

how many tables is feasible, before a HUD is needed?

Quote

12-28-2010 , 02:28 AM

#741

alexd11

old hand

Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 1,965

Quote:

Originally Posted by marl118

how many tables is feasible, before a HUD is needed?

There are Highly profitable players who 20+ table without one. So there is no anwser to your question as everyone is different.

Quote

12-28-2010 , 03:02 AM

#742

MetalSpork

old hand

Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1,294

I wouldn't leave the house without one!

Last edited by MetalSpork; 12-28-2010 at 03:03 AM. Reason: or with one

Quote

12-28-2010 , 05:35 AM

#743

HC82

banned

Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 3,083

pretty basic super turbo question that probably applies to every form of tournament poker:

i keep finding myself in the following spot and not sure what to do:

7 handed blinds 20-40 hero is in SB w/ 60 chips. folds to hero.

So basically I've already posted the SB and have 1 BB left. Should I be shoving any two here because of pot odds? If not, what range should I shove as BB is obviously never folding?

Thank you!

Quote

12-28-2010 , 02:31 PM

#744

MetalSpork

old hand

Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1,294

Quote:

Originally Posted by HC82

...So basically I've already posted the SB and have 1 BB left...

Arrr innn! (arrrrrrr!)

I've been known to fold the absolute dregs vs a big stack when the blinds are higher but you can't go too far wrong sticking it in.

Quote

12-29-2010 , 07:43 AM

#745

HC82

banned

Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 3,083

Thanks. I was hoping for more of a mathematical/ICM evaluation of the problem if anybody else wants to take a stab at it.

Seems to me it should be absolutely correct or incorrect to get it in here with 72o, rather than

Quote:

you can't go too far wrong sticking it in.

I just don't know which it is or how to figure it out.

Quote

12-29-2010 , 09:24 AM

#746

IFoldPktOnes

veteran

Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 2,374

Quote:

Originally Posted by HC82

In the situation you described your stack is so short compared to the others that you can pretty much just use chip EV. You are essentially calling 40 into a pot of 120 so you need 40/120 = 33.3% equity by chip EV (ICM might give 33.5% or 33.6% instead). Only 42o and 32o have less equity than that vs a random hand, but 72o is a shove.

If your stack was larger compared to the average stack size and you were closer to the bubble you would want a bit more than 33.3% equity in these situations. If there are antes it's probably always an ATC shove.

Last edited by IFoldPktOnes; 12-29-2010 at 09:26 AM. Reason: limp n go is also sometimes funny with 1.5bbs against donks

Quote

12-29-2010 , 11:51 AM

#747

HC82

banned

Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 3,083

So I'm shoving anything better than 42o? That works!

Thanks!

Quote

12-29-2010 , 06:42 PM

#748

Clayton

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 32,241

random question, those of you who are sng regs, how many buyins do you guys have in your bankroll? we're assuming a static environment where you regularly cashout and dont plan on moving up or down, and an amount where ur risk of ruin is very small.

Quote

12-29-2010 , 07:01 PM

#749

TomoDaK

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 5,837

Depends on a lot of factors, I play the 16s and like to keep ~100. If I was at the 27/38s I'd keep more like 150 since my edge is a lot smaller

I think if your good and have solid win rate 120-150 BI is enough for just about anyone if we're talking 2-18 mans @ $40 or less stake