Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
(78) 88 awkward potential (78) 88 awkward potential

09-06-2007 , 12:20 PM
SB is a 40/14 knucklehead and aggressive post flop.

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t50 (5 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

SB (t905)
Hero (t2495)
UTG (t1575)
MP (t1480)
Button (t2545)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 8, 8.
3 folds, SB completes, Hero...
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-06-2007 , 12:23 PM
i push because villian is short. 88 sorta stinks postflop in that it is hard to get a worse hand to pay you. this guy is bad enough to call you with Ax, KXs, or 22.
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-06-2007 , 12:33 PM
I don't play this high.

However, the chips you gain from pushing and villain folding don't appear to mean much.

Plus, you have a nice stack compared to the field..

Is playing this for set value wrong? the blinds aren't that high.
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-06-2007 , 12:57 PM
yea i dont look to dance here PF or on the flop unless i end up w/ a set. if it were the next level then eyes iz shuvin.
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-06-2007 , 01:04 PM
He's 40/14 - he would have raised anything that beats us and/or many of the hands we're flipping against.
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-06-2007 , 01:35 PM
Quote:
He's 40/14 - he would have raised anything that beats us and/or many of the hands we're flipping against.
Good point unless Mike has been aggressive enough that villain thinks he can pull off the old trap limp.
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-06-2007 , 01:36 PM
Shoving seems best, most of the time we pick up the 100 chips & other times he calls with some dominated hand.
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-06-2007 , 03:26 PM
I'm raising. Just not sure if it should be 3-4x, bigger or allin.
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-06-2007 , 03:55 PM
Quote:
I'm raising. Just not sure if it should be 3-4x, bigger or allin.
Thanks Darin, I'm glad you've nailed it down for me
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-06-2007 , 04:23 PM
150. Shoving makes us lose tons of values versus lowerpairs and hands which will check fold tons of flops.
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-06-2007 , 04:46 PM
Quote:
Quote:
I'm raising. Just not sure if it should be 3-4x, bigger or allin.
Thanks Darin, I'm glad you've nailed it down for me
Ha, yeah I guess I was pretty much worthless. I'll try harder next time.
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-06-2007 , 07:26 PM
Quote:
150. Shoving makes us lose tons of values versus lowerpairs and hands which will check fold tons of flops.

wouldnt some players be apt to stacking off pf with a lower pair here if we shove but not necessarily post flop with money behind?
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-06-2007 , 11:30 PM
Quote:
150. Shoving makes us lose tons of values versus lowerpairs and hands which will check fold tons of flops.
His aggressiveness post-flop makes me dislike this option more than any other.
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-07-2007 , 05:21 AM
I would shove pf
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-07-2007 , 01:38 PM
i shove pre.
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-07-2007 , 04:08 PM
I just make it 150. If he limp-shoves we can call and I think he's calling w/ a lot of hands that we have dominated and he'll miss the flop 2/3 the time w/ 2 unpaired cards & probably fold to a flop bet anyway.

I see the merit in shoving though since he's aggressive post-flop. I think either option is fine really. By shoving I don't think you really force him to make a big mistake that often. With a hand as strong as 88 and 18BBs, I'd probably like to give him the chance to re-shove or make some sort of big mistake.
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-09-2007 , 12:02 PM
raise to 200
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-09-2007 , 12:40 PM
Quote:
I just make it 150. If he limp-shoves we can call and I think he's calling w/ a lot of hands that we have dominated and he'll miss the flop 2/3 the time w/ 2 unpaired cards & probably fold to a flop bet anyway.

I see the merit in shoving though since he's aggressive post-flop. I think either option is fine really. By shoving I don't think you really force him to make a big mistake that often. With a hand as strong as 88 and 18BBs, I'd probably like to give him the chance to re-shove or make some sort of big mistake.

I think that is probably the best option due to the situation.
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-09-2007 , 01:43 PM
I'd raise to 200. Shoving is giving up a lot of value. As many have mention, 88 is miles ahead of his range.

I'd say Raise slighty better than shove a lot better than check.
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-09-2007 , 01:45 PM
Quote:
I'd raise to 200. Shoving is giving up a lot of value. As many have mention, 88 is miles ahead of his range.

I'd say Raise slighty better than shove a lot better than check.
You raise to 200 when SB has 900?
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-09-2007 , 01:47 PM
Quote:
Quote:
I'd raise to 200. Shoving is giving up a lot of value. As many have mention, 88 is miles ahead of his range.

I'd say Raise slighty better than shove a lot better than check.
You raise to 200 when SB has 900?
yes.
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-09-2007 , 01:58 PM
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'd raise to 200. Shoving is giving up a lot of value. As many have mention, 88 is miles ahead of his range.

I'd say Raise slighty better than shove a lot better than check.
You raise to 200 when SB has 900?
yes.
Oh, that's neat.

I think shoving is much better than making it 200. When you make it 200 you just bloat the pot and make it harder to play post-flop. what does 200 accomplis that 150 doesn't?
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-09-2007 , 02:23 PM
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'd raise to 200. Shoving is giving up a lot of value. As many have mention, 88 is miles ahead of his range.

I'd say Raise slighty better than shove a lot better than check.
You raise to 200 when SB has 900?
yes.
Oh, that's neat.

I think shoving is much better than making it 200. When you make it 200 you just bloat the pot and make it harder to play post-flop. what does 200 accomplis that 150 doesn't?
betting 200 gets more value than 150. I don't think it's that difficult to play post flop here.
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-09-2007 , 02:26 PM
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'd raise to 200. Shoving is giving up a lot of value. As many have mention, 88 is miles ahead of his range.

I'd say Raise slighty better than shove a lot better than check.
You raise to 200 when SB has 900?
yes.
Oh, that's neat.

I think shoving is much better than making it 200. When you make it 200 you just bloat the pot and make it harder to play post-flop. what does 200 accomplis that 150 doesn't?
betting 200 gets more value than 150. I don't think it's that difficult to play post flop here.
agree to disagree
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote
09-09-2007 , 02:58 PM
why make it too cheap for them to play? why give them better odds? 50 more makes us 50 more when opponent misses the flop which is probably around 75% of the time. i wouldnt really want him to stay in the pot when i had raised to 150.
(78) 88 awkward potential Quote

      
m