Villain is 30/23/10 over 79 hands. Will you go for a thin value river or showdown ?

PokerStars - €2.70+€0.30|750/1500 Ante 150 NL - Holdem - 9 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

UTG+1: 112,043
Hero (MP): 73,675
MP+1: 112,366
MP+2: 47,825
CO: 32,520
BTN: 63,779
SB: 24,905
BB: 74,803
UTG: 20,825

9 players post ante of 150, SB posts SB 750, BB posts BB 1,500

Pre Flop: (pot: 3,600) Hero has 9 A

fold, fold, Hero raises to 3,000, fold, fold, fold, fold, fold, BB calls 1,500

Flop: (8,100, 2 players) T 7 8
BB checks, Hero bets 4,000, BB calls 4,000

Turn: (16,100, 2 players) A
BB checks, Hero bets 8,000, BB calls 8,000

River: (32,100, 2 players) 5
BB checks, Hero ?

check behind, do you think worse hands pay? I think no.

If we are good on the turn, we still are on this brick river, we have showdown value but we can't stand a raise otr. betting here will be very thin. Villain seems loose and aggro and this board is all over his defending range.

I check behind, we are not getting 3 streets unless we are beat.

Villain is 30/23/10 over 79 hands < I've got no idea what those stats mean.

Okay , this is very dependent on your opponent. Sometimes i'll bet otf and sometimes i'll check back and take a stab OTT. It really depends, if villian is weak i'd take a stab right there otf because he'll fold most of his range unless he's got top pair or a draw maybe.

as played , I'd check back otr , i dont think there's much hands we can get any thin value from.

If you know V is capable of calling of with far worse like 2ed pair or 3rd pair then yes you can bet OTR, but without those reads it's difficult.

Looks as if villain has some sort of showdown value and just wants to get there as cheaply as possible as he hasn't shown any real strength. Maybe like a J10/K10/9 10 type hand that could pay off a small riverbet. Could have a hand like 99 that had showdown value on the flop and a draw that villain chased and missed.

Guess he can also have hands like A10 and other aces or 2 pair aces that we also lose to. In game I'd probably just check behind cuz we did get 2 streets of value.

I would just check behind

Check the flop. As played pot control the turn. Now I would check back. The idea is I want to get to showdown as cheaply as possible and I don't want to fold to a raise anywhere in the hand except maybe the river. If I had checked the first two streets I would probably go for thin value otr vs a T or middle pair. I don't see any worse aces in his range that didn't hit 2p.

Is the pf raise standard here,with 6 players after you and just a min raise? Isnt there a danger of being reraised? I thought this woulda been a fold in this position,no?

Preflop i guess it depends of the table. There are antes in play and we have a big stack so it might be ok to take a stab if players don't 3 bet much.

On the river i would only bet if villain calls with less then top pair and won't reraise me if i bet small because we now have to fold. If villain likes to check raise bluff if i bet lets say 1\3 of the pot or 1\4, then i check the river.

Against a Tight-passive player i'd check the river but against a loose\passive id definitely go for a very tiny bet and fold to a reraise. But against an aggressive player, you might also be getting a very small value bet in because usually they will reraise if they have you beat somewhere along the hand. The tighter the player the less i bet this.