Quote:
Originally Posted by djs1070
Just curious, are you getting away from TPTK this early?
Against someone who I never have beat when the money goes in? Of course not. This would include most villain I'd lable as "decent".
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7castle
1. I didn't say I am fan of 5/10, but I think there is some serious math behind and calling e.g. 7% should be still good. But here we're talking about almost precisely 4% (60/1480), and you explicitely called it mistake - which implies you don't even think it is close.
2. I am not, that was an example. My problem is that I have no clue how to play AK here (PF & flop too). I'd like to hear your opinion how to play AK here. But I think sets are often played this way, since few players open them, and c/r seems too strong. So I'd probably c/c set here. I am not decent in your eyes though.
Well, you did mention it as if it was some sort of authority that needs to be considered. Or as if it's got much merit in an STT situation. I'd be amazed if you showed me some math that says calling 7% of effective stacks to setmine is clearly good.
I'm not sure where you got the idea that this has got much to do with our stack from, most certainly what matters if effective stacks. Sure if MP1 comes along it's a different situation altogether, but as long as he doesn't (and he didn't), it's closer to 5% (4.65).
I don't see how using AK as an example serves any use, since it's so obviously removed from his range. AK is a very standard call preflop and a c/f on the flop, unless we have the nut flush draw - which'd give us some options.
I think sets aren't usually something we need to consider, since hero should have 88/77/44 here so seldomly.