Quote:
Originally Posted by Dax @UltimatePoker
Whew, lot of questions. I'll do my best.
Tip of the iceberg, I assure you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dax @UltimatePoker
We use iovation to look up a given player's "fraud score". They don't have any access to our hands, our database, our office, our software or sensitive information. The relationship is distant at best.
Do you know how/where Iovation gets their 'fraud score"? How can they score any player without seeing them in action? Iovation is your security for detecting collusion and other forms of cheating, no?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dax @UltimatePoker
"They" are the Nevada Gaming Control Board. They have an entire division (Audit: http://gaming.nv.gov/index.aspx?page=45) who have requirements for reports and process review. We both provide them with reports in various formats (such as a "table session" report that has line items for every single bet/fold/raise and the pots awarded, bets returned, rake taken for as long as that table exists - it's several hundred pages) and access to our systems to review those reports directly.
After the field trial, we have the permission of the GCB to update our software. This essentially means no new versions until the end of field trial, unless something critical comes up (at which point field trial would start over). Field trial can be reset for a variety of reasons, but essentially it's up to GCB to determine if you're successful in your field trial.
We can't add anything when the GCB "isn't looking". Every piece of our software is either stamped as core or non-core. Core components are things like the shuffle, actions the buttons take when clicked, how the pots are awarded and so on. Non-core components are things like the text blurb in the deposit window or the selection of avatars. Core components MUST be approved by our third party certification company, GLI (http://www.gaminglabs.com/ - warning, autoplaying sound). Once GLI approves it, they write a report and sends it to GCB for their approval. What this means is, in practice, new features need to be vetted a long time in advance. Once we finish our internal planning, developing and testing, we can't just roll it out - we have to send the code to GLI, then wait for GCB approval. This means we need to plan ahead, and we're currently already working on v2 and v3.
We select them and pay them. There's only two in Nevada (that I know of - so don't quote me on this, and if a rep from another certification lab is here, please speak up): GLI and BMM. Both have employees who have previously worked in the GCB directly. I don't actually know if the audit results are public, but you can try contacting GLI directly to ask.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dax @UltimatePoker
We're majority owned by Station Casinos, who is owned by the same people who own the UFC (the Fertitta family). Tom Breitling, our chairperson, is easily google-able, but owned a travel company (later sold to Expedia) and the Golden Nugget Casino. Tobin Prior (our CEO) used to run the Atlantis in the Bahamas. Basically, we consider the Station/UFC/UP companies to be a part of the same extended family.
How nice for you all...to consider yourselve's 'family'. As I understand it, a good many others consider these folks a 'family' as well.
http://www.ufc.com/news/ufc-ultimate...al-money-poker
'Ultimate Poker, a majority-owned subsidiary of Station Casinos LLC.'.
http://www.pokernewsdaily.com/online...-in-u-s-23707/
'Ultimate Gaming, a subsidiary of Station Casinos LLC, will see its Ultimate Poker deal its first hand...'
Subsidiaries are separately incorporated entities that are owned or controlled by a parent entity. Is Ultimate Gaming incorporated? If do, as what...exactly?
Does Station Casinos LLC own UP directly, or is UP owned by Ultimate Gaming (whatever)?
http://www.ultimategaming.com/about-ultimate-gaming/
So what's the relationship between Station Casinos LLC and Station Casinos, Inc.? Why are they separate (i.e. LLC & Inc.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dax @UltimatePoker
I'm honestly uneducated on Station Casinos history, sorry. I just work here.
I hope I was able to answer some of your questions, but again, just to make it clear, I'm involved in the poker product side of things for Ultimate Poker. Let me know if I can help you find the answers you're looking for, or the people who know them.
You appreciate that we've heard this sort of thing before, yes?
Perhaps you could ask someone to update the UP website to be crystal clear about the company(s) structure and who runs and owns UP. This might give us paranoid types some comfort that UP is not obfuscating the structure and ownership using layers of coporations and tradestyles, as other Pokersites have for suspect reasons