Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story)

03-12-2025 , 08:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kioshk
good going

THANK YOU.

I haven't been there since the summer of 1982, and I do still love that version of Chicago. It was glorious and I was young. IBeDrummin lives there now iirc.

Smashing Pumpkins eh? I barely remember them except for the big hits.
Billy Corgan was there for me in the darkest times. His lyrics are the essence of spoken poetry and he is still a God today!
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-12-2025 , 08:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuma
*Sleep Chart*
Slept- 3hr, 40min
Awake - 3am, Wednesday

Next test is tonight. Maybe it is time to get 30 mins of natural sleep.

Maybe it's me, but this line isn't going anywhere.

Maybe if you look hard enough you can find a backdoor....
Total of 8.5 hours slept last night, awake at 9am, Wednesday.

Most I've slept since 2/21

Amazing all around.

Can't wait to try and sleep without the pill tonight.
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-12-2025 , 09:00 AM


Spaceboy is about Billy's family.
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-12-2025 , 09:04 AM
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-12-2025 , 09:25 AM
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-12-2025 , 03:11 PM
Dear Journal,

Today I napped for about 90 minutes all on my own.
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-12-2025 , 04:30 PM
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-12-2025 , 04:57 PM
Tell me you love me
Come back and haunt me

Running in circles
Chasing our tails
Coming back as we are
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-12-2025 , 05:36 PM


I'm not sure there is anything better in this life than generative art.
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-12-2025 , 05:46 PM
To determine what percent of wild animals "care" about their children, we need to consider the proportion of wild animal species that exhibit parental care—behaviors such as feeding, protecting, or nurturing their offspring after birth or hatching. Wild animals encompass all non-domesticated species across mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish, and invertebrates, and the answer hinges on estimating how many of these species demonstrate such care.
The animal kingdom is vast, with approximately 1.5 million described species. Invertebrates, particularly insects, dominate this count, making up over 95% of all species (around 1.44 million), while vertebrates—mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and fish—comprise about 60,000 species, or roughly 4%. Parental care varies widely across these groups, so let’s break it down:
Mammals: With about 6,000 species, nearly all exhibit parental care, typically through nursing and protecting their young. This gives us approximately 6,000 species with care.

Birds: Around 10,000 species exist, and most engage in parental care, such as incubating eggs and feeding chicks. We’ll estimate 10,000 species with care.

Reptiles: Of about 10,000 species, only a minority—like some crocodiles and lizards—show care, such as guarding eggs or hatchlings. Estimating conservatively, perhaps 20% (2,000 species) exhibit care.

Amphibians: With 7,000 species, some frogs and salamanders guard eggs or carry tadpoles. Assuming 30% provide care, that’s about 2,100 species.

Fish: Among 30,000 species, some, like certain cichlids, guard eggs or young, but many do not. If 20% exhibit care, that’s 6,000 species.

Invertebrates: This group, including over 1 million insect species, is the largest. Parental care is rare—seen in some bees, ants, beetles, and spiders—but not the norm. Estimating 0.5% of 1.44 million species gives us about 7,200 species with care.

Adding these estimates:
Vertebrates: 6,000 (mammals) + 10,000 (birds) + 2,000 (reptiles) + 2,100 (amphibians) + 6,000 (fish) = 26,100 species.

Invertebrates: 7,200 species.

Total with parental care: 26,100 + 7,200 = 33,300 species.

Dividing by the total number of species (1,500,000), the percentage is:
33,3001,500,000×100≈2.22%\frac{33,300}{1,500,000} \times 100 \approx 2.22\%\frac{33,300}{1,500,000} \times 100 \approx 2.22\%

Given the roughness of these estimates—especially for invertebrates, where care might be even less common—this figure suggests that around 2–3% of wild animal species exhibit parental care. The dominance of invertebrates, where care is minimal, pulls the percentage down significantly, despite near-universal care in mammals and birds.
However, the question’s phrasing, "care" in quotation marks, might imply a broad or intuitive interpretation. Still, in biological terms, parental care typically includes any post-birth or post-hatching investment, aligning with our calculation. Rounding for simplicity and acknowledging the approximations, a reasonable answer is 3%.
Thus, approximately 3 percent of wild animals care about their children, reflecting the small fraction of species that invest in their offspring amidst the vast diversity of life.
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-12-2025 , 05:51 PM
The future is here.

Things will change rapidly, in the coming years, and many won't be able to notice it.

If you're not having a great time day in and day out, I'm so sorry and feel bad for you.
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-12-2025 , 06:54 PM
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-12-2025 , 06:56 PM
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-12-2025 , 10:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuma
*Sleep Chart*
Slept- 3hr, 40min
Awake - 3am, Wednesday

Next test is tonight. Maybe it is time to get 30 mins of natural sleep.

Maybe it's me, but this line isn't going anywhere.

Maybe if you look hard enough you can find a backdoor....
Decided to drug it up and get to sleep early.

I have 9 pills left. Next Dr appointment is in 12 days.

She said she will be prescribing me something similar to Ativan but a little more mild.

I already feel more balanced than usual and predict the full blown insomnia will be over in the coming days.

I wonder how much weed I've smoked over the years....

(1g/day/7years) ... = about 6 lbs.
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-13-2025 , 02:00 AM
Well, that sucks.

I got two hours of sleep and wasted a pill.
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-13-2025 , 03:37 AM
It's been about 2 months since I've last played live poker.

I have Seasonal Affective, and Winter crushed me this year.

I'm sipping a cold brew, and am going to MGM in a few minutes.

Later, I am going to blog about my poker session.

I've seen SuitedJustice write about playing poker without penalty.

And in fact, I do think it is what my readers want to see.

Tuma
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-13-2025 , 03:51 AM
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-13-2025 , 04:03 AM


(Audible)...: Oh my god. This is good.
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-13-2025 , 07:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuma
It's been about 2 months since I've last played live poker.

I have Seasonal Affective, and Winter crushed me this year.
This was/is my first Missouri winter after 38 years in Texas. I'd forgotten how oppressive it is, how crazy it makes me. Never doing this again, I know that.
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-13-2025 , 11:17 AM
funny you mention that i spent winter in the ozarks last year and i kept thinking how incredibly warm and nice it was
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-13-2025 , 11:49 AM
I could have done without tonight's poker session that went from 6-10am.

-$389 was the official tally.

I played my A/A+ game tonight, very happy about that.

The game was as insane as imagineable, and I didn't catch any cards.

When I sat down, most players were deep, half asleep, and on tilt. There was one whale, in the two seat. It could have been his first time ever playing, he was having a lot of fun.
And then (3) 2/5 players were moved after their game broke. And all hell broke loose.
The guy on my direct left was raising to $55 every other hand.
Someone was all-in just about every 3 hands.
I saw 44 correctly 4! shove preflop.
I was cruising with a profit of $12, when all of a sudden, that dude on my left offered to pay for my bomb pot.
I told him "I owe you nothing," as I gathered his two chips.
Cards: 87dd
Boards:
Tx 9x 3d
9x 5d 4d
For a nuclear draw.

The whale leads $30 into $40 pot. Guy to his left calls.
In hindsight calling, or min-raising, may have been more optimal. But I shipped it all-in. ($312).
I even turned a second flush draw, but unfortunately I lost both boards to A9xx.
Hopefully I have learned my lesson about playing bomb pots.
Fun night all around. Made friends with the wild guy on my left, and was friendly with the table.

At 9am, the table turned over, and it was OMC city. I wasn't fresh enough to grind that type of game (for several required hours.)

I'm still a world champion.

Godspeed,
Tuma

Last edited by Tuma; 03-13-2025 at 12:00 PM.
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-13-2025 , 11:56 AM
If anyone who isn't ADMIN has a problem with me sharing poker stories, please share your qualms in this thread, or privately, and I will take it to heart.

Tuma
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-13-2025 , 02:09 PM
No, if one's thoughts approach the speed of light, their mind cannot end up in the future in the way the question might suggest. Let’s explore why this is the case by breaking it down into clear, manageable parts.

What Are Thoughts?

Thoughts are the result of electrical and chemical signals moving through the brain. These signals, carried by nerve impulses, travel at speeds of up to 120 meters per second. In contrast, the speed of light is approximately 300,000 kilometers per second (or 300,000,000 meters per second). This means that, in a physical sense, thoughts are far too slow to ever approach the speed of light. The biological processes in our brains simply cannot operate at such velocities.
A Hypothetical Twist: Could Thoughts Move Faster?
Let’s entertain the idea that the question is more of a thought experiment—what if thoughts could somehow process information at speeds close to that of light? To explore this, we need to consider time dilation, a key concept from Einstein’s theory of special relativity.
Time Dilation Explained
Time dilation occurs when an object moves at a significant fraction of the speed of light relative to an observer. For that moving object:
Time passes more slowly compared to a stationary observer.

The effect becomes dramatic only as the speed gets very close to the speed of light.

For example, if you were on a spaceship traveling at 90% of the speed of light, time for you would pass slower than for someone left behind on Earth. When you returned, you might find that years had passed for them, while only months had passed for you. In this sense, you’d have “traveled into the future” relative to the stationary observer.

Applying This to Thoughts

But here’s the catch: time dilation applies to physical objects moving through space—like a spaceship or a person—not to abstract processes like thoughts. The brain, as a physical entity, would need to move at near-light speed for time dilation to occur. Even if we imagined a brain processing thoughts at incredible speeds, the thoughts themselves aren’t physical objects with their own velocity. They’re activities within the brain, limited by its biological structure.
So, accelerating your thought processes wouldn’t detach your mind from your body or send it into the future. Your entire body—including your brain—would need to travel at near-light speed for time dilation to affect you, and even then, your experience of time would feel normal during the journey.
A Philosophical Angle: Mind vs. Body
What if the question implies the mind is separate from the body, perhaps as a non-physical entity? Could a “super-fast mind” leap into the future independently? This idea ventures into philosophy and metaphysics, where some speculate about consciousness existing beyond the physical realm. However:
There’s no scientific evidence to support the mind as a separate entity capable of independent travel.

Even in such theories, there’s no mechanism linking “thought speed” to time travel.

Science Fiction and Perception

In science fiction, characters sometimes perceive time differently—like slowing it down to think faster (e.g., “bullet time”). This is a change in perception, not actual time travel. Your mind might feel like it’s jumping ahead, but it remains tied to the present moment of your physical body.
The Bottom Line
Based on our current understanding of physics and neuroscience:
Thoughts cannot approach the speed of light because they’re bound by the brain’s physical limits.

Even in a hypothetical scenario, accelerating thought processes wouldn’t enable the mind to “end up in the future” independently.

Time dilation requires the entire physical system (body and brain) to move near light speed, and it affects how time passes relative to others—not the mind alone leaping forward.

This question is a captivating blend of science and imagination, but as it stands, the answer is no. Your mind stays firmly in the present, no matter how fast your thoughts might seem to race!
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-13-2025 , 02:16 PM
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote
03-13-2025 , 03:16 PM
Quantum Entanglement (A Love Story) Quote

      
m