chimpstare blog
03-19-2014
, 11:28 PM
03-20-2014
, 04:20 PM
03-21-2014
, 01:03 PM
03-21-2014
, 03:26 PM
03-21-2014
, 06:18 PM
03-22-2014
, 12:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ESPN
Stanford 58 - New Mexico 53
03-22-2014
, 12:33 AM
03-22-2014
, 01:48 PM
03-22-2014
, 04:59 PM
Quote:
What would be your views on special low variance cash tables where any time you go all in, rather than seeing the remaining cards, you instantly win a share of the pot equal to your equity. In other words, if you get it all in pre with AA against KK you take 81% of the pot (the villain gets 19%), or if you get it in with K
Q on JT2
against an 33-88 you take 71% of the pot.
I have never seen anyone suggest this before or talk about it, (maybe because it's a rubbish idea) but what do you think?
I imagine that it wouldn't make any difference to most full time grinders since they put in such a large volume of hands anyway, but it could help with the tilt for some players. It would certainly be more attractive for the semi-serious part time players. Not sure if fish would like it or not, which I suppose is the most important thing.
Q on JT2 against an 33-88 you take 71% of the pot.I have never seen anyone suggest this before or talk about it, (maybe because it's a rubbish idea) but what do you think?
I imagine that it wouldn't make any difference to most full time grinders since they put in such a large volume of hands anyway, but it could help with the tilt for some players. It would certainly be more attractive for the semi-serious part time players. Not sure if fish would like it or not, which I suppose is the most important thing.
03-22-2014
, 10:04 PM
amazing blog 
03-23-2014
, 07:12 PM
03-24-2014
, 11:33 AM
03-26-2014
, 12:10 AM
04-05-2014
, 01:10 PM
04-09-2014
, 11:40 PM
04-11-2014
, 11:10 PM
04-12-2014
, 10:58 AM
04-16-2014
, 12:02 PM
04-18-2014
, 05:12 PM
