Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog

03-14-2015 , 01:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abstinence
Why so adamant about something that is clearly false and seemingly trivial and irrelevant? Does the response make sense to you or seem proportional in nature? If you know it to be true then why isn't there evidentiary support or relevant action? With so much speculation, why wasn't there ever any relevant or meaningful action?

Of course I am referring to the sports situation in this town.

Last edited by Abstinence; 03-14-2015 at 01:36 PM.
Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-14-2015 , 01:31 PM
Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-14-2015 , 01:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abstinence
Doth protests too much
Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-14-2015 , 01:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abstinence
Oh what a tangled web we weave when we first practice to deceive
Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-14-2015 , 01:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abstinence
Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-14-2015 , 01:43 PM
Spoiler:





Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-14-2015 , 04:07 PM
Spoiler:


You took a little something that did happen (10-6 record) and leveraged it to justify doing all kinds of nonsensical bull ****, and to talk all kinds of defamatory **** (NJ.com ON DJax).

(1) "We see that this meaningless and random X is clearly occurring. "

(2) Then you tie it all together in your head with the grain of truth that did happened and unequivocally call it Y. To build support around it, group think and reassurance are used. XY --> Z, even though the grain of truth you got (10-6), wasn't Y in the first place. If Y --> Z makes X irrelevant. This is because Y --> Z all the time, every time without exception. You can be close to Y, and not be Y... And still no Y --> Z. Close to Y. Yes. Y, no.

And no ****ing favors, compassion, or decency were done for anyone. If you believe exceptions were made after all the crap that has occurred, there's a bridge in Brooklyn for sale It's strictly business. No Czar Coach/GM running this area (Philadelphia) sat in his office, *chomping at the bit* for Z, said to himself, "Ya know what, even though I can't stand the guy, and we got the goods to go ahead and achieve Z, ya know, I just don't wanna do that because trading McCoy, just doesn't sit right with me. Let's cut him a break."

Yeah... No

(3)If Y, no need for X, you just go to Z. Y-->Z (Super Bowl), no need to constantly harp on X either. Y-->Z, and it's not debatable. You can still lie and frame it again in almost anyway you'd like. I really don't give a **** what you do. I was speaking about the facts. I was also speaking about meaningful actions and results that actually occurred.

(4)And when all else fails, the dust settle, X is meaningless, the claim that Y was Y, but inexplicably, not Y-->Z, what do you think will happen? The Chips crumble before you, and you trivialize it and say he's insane. You know this to be untrue, but you'll use it anyway. Chip is not insane.

(6) Next you leverage the grain of truth (10 - 6) and unequivocally state that it was Y instead of close but no cigar, even though if Y-->Z without exception, and there's never been a Y-->Z. There's been a lot other weird and unjustifiable equations that make no sense like HE-->H. (Reverse Helium Hallucinations, etc.) But yeah, neither here nor there.

Mix it with NJ.com style libel/slander (DJax), and let the media/public run with it to the point that they delude themselves into believing lies, making ****ty inferences and deductions, and that it all happened because he cut his nose despite his face. Again, bridge in Brooklyn is for sale.

(7) You finalize and implement your execution, with everyone hysterically laughing in approval while it all went down (the NFL trades) because you knew it would work out. And when it doesn't, nothing but shrugs and smirks, and discount what's been planned, but has gone according to it. With each successive failing that ensues, reassurance from a known liar are sought.




Last edited by Abstinence; 03-14-2015 at 04:23 PM.
Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-14-2015 , 04:28 PM


Found a good youtube comment by...

Spoiler:
doggywoggy boy

"Death cab for cutie, you are so mistaken. She was not in fear. The fear in others perceives only fear where there is not. She was the light unrecognised. To think of a god as anything else, is in the eye of the perceiver. To your question, how could a god, the creator, fail, and be a black sun. It is because humanity failed to see the truth in her. So now it is welcome to yourselves, a continuing reality of judge-mentality, devoid of higher universal truth, the highway to hell. Judge-mentality thinks it knows better than god, and to judge her away is to judge yourself away, and this will be-get your consequence. Death cab for who now ? Your day of blunt awakening will eventually come and then you may learn and see. Your purpose here..
If she was accepted for what she is, she may have guided humanity towards heaven, where she came from, her home, and now she returns home without humanity. Your so called “black sun” is not the one missing out. As you judge another, you define your self, and judge-mentality blinds one from truth, and kills truth and beauty. Well done, congratulations.
...she is the creator, and is everything you are not....god....good bye and good luck to you my friend..."
Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-14-2015 , 04:40 PM




Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-14-2015 , 04:41 PM
Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-14-2015 , 06:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spaceman Bryce
why is x 9 and y 6, grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Keep at it SMB! I don't want you to end up like this guy when you find love and all that.

http://news.yahoo.com/groom-fails-ma...065433753.html
Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-14-2015 , 06:43 PM
Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-14-2015 , 07:34 PM
Spoiler:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Morphismus
Quote:
Originally Posted by veract


Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-14-2015 , 07:35 PM
Spoiler:




Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-14-2015 , 07:36 PM
Spoiler:
Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-14-2015 , 07:37 PM
Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-14-2015 , 07:40 PM
http://consequenceofsound.net/2015/0...at-for-a-week/

"Lieutenant – If I Kill This Thing We’re All Going to Eat for a Week"
Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-14-2015 , 07:41 PM




Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-14-2015 , 07:42 PM
.
Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-14-2015 , 07:55 PM


Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-14-2015 , 07:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoQuarter
Sometimes I think they will slip up and expose themselves. The woman is their tool. You see/hear it too right? Stay strong man, they will never understand. Dont talk too much though, you know why. Your not alone man. Just pay attention, theyll expose themselves before too long.
Don't post in my blog again *a****.
Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-14-2015 , 09:39 PM
Good luck on the LSAT!
Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-14-2015 , 11:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Villian1
Good luck on the LSAT!
Not until June 8th. But, I have a nearly meaningless intro Kaplan diagnostic exam on March 17th, that will give me a baseline score to work from. After that there are mid-point and final-diagnostic exams in April. Plenty of time to learn, practice, and improve, between now and June, using all the Kaplan utilities. The live classes will be an assist, as well.

This is merely speculation, but it seems to me like LG and LR sections, with enough study and practice, will on average, produce the biggest returns for students (at least for me), due to their finite nature. Whereas the RC section, even after learning the methodologies and practicing, requires the most effort to move up in score.
Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-15-2015 , 12:28 AM
As for the writing section, whatever.
Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote
03-15-2015 , 12:40 PM
The main actor in this episode (Mike Keppler):





Can someone plz explain to me how this 2 part episode of CSI made any sense whatsoever? Thanks.
Abstinence's Mood Journal/Blog/Vlog Quote

      
m