Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
***** Official SSSHLHE Stats Thread ***** ***** Official SSSHLHE Stats Thread *****

09-02-2010 , 08:50 PM
stoving 65% looks like {any suited, any broadway, any pair, any Ax, 3gappers down to T6o, 2gappers down to 85o, 1gappers down to 64o, connectors down to 54o}. obviously we adjust this depending on who's doing the stealing. hopefully i can develop more of a post flop arsenal such that i can defend 85o and Q8o to a LAGfish who can fold or a tight player who can lay down A high.

last month over 30K hands it looks like i was defending about 55% to a single raiser with no callers. so ive increased it about 4%.
09-03-2010 , 04:22 AM
I am trying to get more use out of "call flop cbet" and "call turn cbet" stats.

Has anyone done studies what call flop 50% means? Does it means he floats any? etc etc.

My flop fold vs cbet is 26.6% @ 2/4 and 30 1/2. Am I calling too much?
I am trying to use these CFCBet and CTCbet intelligently.
Can I get a sample of these stats from some of you and plz add your overall perpecption of your flop looseness (i.e. if you are a peeler or a nit etc).
09-03-2010 , 12:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThisKid$Tough
last month over 30K hands it looks like i was defending about 55% to a single raiser with no callers. so ive increased it about 4%.
Yeah do it slowly is my recommendation, you will be playing a lot of marginal hands oop that you are not used to so gradual is probably better.
09-10-2010 , 01:27 AM
These are my stats for the past few weeks since I joined here. Appreciate any advice/criticism.


and I have no idea why I'm such a nit at 1/2
09-10-2010 , 01:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MicroGrinder84
I am trying to get more use out of "call flop cbet" and "call turn cbet" stats.

Has anyone done studies what call flop 50% means? Does it means he floats any? etc etc.

My flop fold vs cbet is 26.6% @ 2/4 and 30 1/2. Am I calling too much?
I am trying to use these CFCBet and CTCbet intelligently.
Can I get a sample of these stats from some of you and plz add your overall perpecption of your flop looseness (i.e. if you are a peeler or a nit etc).
I haven't done too much statistically work with it but I've basically been using it from a fold equity stand point combined with my notes on what they peel. It comes in very handy with fish to help discern when to fire the 2nd barrel.

Basically I look at how often they fold to turn cbet, evaluate the board and consider how big the pot is... i think you need to consider all these aspects rather than just say "his call turn cbet is blah so i check back/ bet"
09-10-2010 , 02:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beep Beep
These are my stats for the past few weeks since I joined here. Appreciate any advice/criticism.


and I have no idea why I'm such a nit at 1/2
too nitty
09-10-2010 , 02:56 AM
I know my 1/2 stats are, what about my .50/1? Am I shooting more for those numbers?
09-10-2010 , 03:03 AM
well. kind of...3 bet more and showdown more. i don't get what happened here, scared money?
09-10-2010 , 03:16 AM
No not but I think if I started running bad I tightened up quite a bit whenever that happened. That's the only thing I can think of though.
09-10-2010 , 03:18 AM
26/18 won't get it done going forward, and moving up...you can look back for stats i find better..and if you don't see what i mean pm me.
09-10-2010 , 08:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beep Beep
These are my stats for the past few weeks since I joined here. Appreciate any advice/criticism.


and I have no idea why I'm such a nit at 1/2
Tighten up UTG and loosen way up in CO and on BTN.

Looks like you're opening QJo and A8o and such UTG. Don't make it harder for yourself playing marginal hands OOP when you're not playing enough hands in position. Also, at 1/2 you're probably facing a lot of open limps which you should be isolating with a wide range.
09-14-2010 , 10:35 AM
Is 3-betting 11% too nitty? Should I open up more? If so, where?
09-14-2010 , 11:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColeW123
Is 3-betting 11% too nitty? Should I open up more? If so, where?
late position?
09-14-2010 , 11:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anfernee
late position?
:P, but I'm not trying to 3-bet ATo against a UTG or UTG+1 range.

Do you think since I've been playing primarily .5/1 for the last few months I just don't get in to as many spots where I need to 3-bet? There is much more limping, and a lot less raising.

Last edited by ColeW123; 09-14-2010 at 11:07 AM. Reason: This 11% is from the last few months..
09-14-2010 , 12:39 PM
ofc it depends on ranges ... but 11% seems too nitty
09-14-2010 , 12:41 PM
What's a normal 3-bet %? 13 or 14? What about the reason I stated?
09-14-2010 , 01:45 PM
limped pots do not affect your 3! %, DUCY?
09-15-2010 , 01:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColeW123
What's a normal 3-bet %? 13 or 14? What about the reason I stated?
13-14 3bet is spew at 0.5/1. If you have position on 2 loose passive fish with a max PFR of 10-15, consider what their ranges are. You have much fewer options to 3bet with 45%+ equity. In the same situation, the TAGs at the table will be in early position, so again, you'll have fewer options to 3bet.

Your 3bet% should vary widely depending on table conditions. 8%-10% would be good at 0.5/1 given you have a good seat.
09-16-2010 , 11:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_Sarang
13-14 3bet is spew at 0.5/1. If you have position on 2 loose passive fish with a max PFR of 10-15, consider what their ranges are. You have much fewer options to 3bet with 45%+ equity. In the same situation, the TAGs at the table will be in early position, so again, you'll have fewer options to 3bet.

Your 3bet% should vary widely depending on table conditions. 8%-10% would be good at 0.5/1 given you have a good seat.
Interesting perspective Jack. I have been working on getting my 3! up because I am just over 9% right now. I know I am missing some spots, but I don't see that many more spots that I can profitably 3!. I think I may be missing the mark in the blinds. Generally, I don't like to 3! out of the blinds unless I think it is a steal or I have a premium holding. I know this thinking is flawed.
09-17-2010 , 02:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Verno
Interesting perspective Jack. I have been working on getting my 3! up because I am just over 9% right now. I know I am missing some spots, but I don't see that many more spots that I can profitably 3!. I think I may be missing the mark in the blinds. Generally, I don't like to 3! out of the blinds unless I think it is a steal or I have a premium holding. I know this thinking is flawed.
I had the same problem and I think it came down to folding my SB too much and just calling in the BB

Often when we're in the blinds a TAG will be in the CO. CO ranges, depending on villain, can be very very wide, so we can profitably 3-bet from the blinds with a decent range. At 1/2-3/6 on Stars many of the mass tabling TAGs have identical ranges for CO and BTN.

By 3 betting hands that you would have folded before in SB or simply flatted in BB, you'll raise your 3bet% by 2-3%.
09-18-2010 , 06:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_Sarang
I had the same problem and I think it came down to folding my SB too much and just calling in the BB

Often when we're in the blinds a TAG will be in the CO. CO ranges, depending on villain, can be very very wide, so we can profitably 3-bet from the blinds with a decent range. At 1/2-3/6 on Stars many of the mass tabling TAGs have identical ranges for CO and BTN.

By 3 betting hands that you would have folded before in SB or simply flatted in BB, you'll raise your 3bet% by 2-3%.
this is really interesting and i would love to hear some more feedback about this.
lately i found out that players who have high 3! pre flop actually re raising much more from the blinds in steal situations, while i like to flat call my Big blinds and go for a c/r. playing in a laggy style - will 3betting pre will bring better results? i am at about 11.6 in my 3! should i consider a change in my game? (i just think post flop is a much easier play after flat calling...)
09-18-2010 , 06:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by merryber
this is really interesting and i would love to hear some more feedback about this.
lately i found out that players who have high 3! pre flop actually re raising much more from the blinds in steal situations, while i like to flat call my Big blinds and go for a c/r. playing in a laggy style - will 3betting pre will bring better results? i am at about 11.6 in my 3! should i consider a change in my game? (i just think post flop is a much easier play after flat calling...)
merry, if you like to flat your entire range, thats fine. 3betting from the BB against CO / BTN do not have to produce better results
09-18-2010 , 06:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dredok
merry, if you like to flat your entire range, thats fine. 3betting from the BB against CO / BTN do not have to produce better results
I think this is a good theory, but tends to fail in practice. When an opponent opens a wide range, you should be 3-betting quite a few hands (A5o, 98s, ect.). Of course, these weak hands are going to tend to miss the flop frequently, which causes many players to c/c or c/f instead of c/r. So while I agree that it's possible to make a call-c/r strategy work against wide ranges, I think that most small stakes players would do better simply 3b'ing in those spots.
09-18-2010 , 06:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leader
I think this is a good theory, but tends to fail in practice. When an opponent opens a wide range, you should be 3-betting quite a few hands (A5o, 98s, ect.). Of course, these weak hands are going to tend to miss the flop frequently, which causes many players to c/c or c/f instead of c/r. So while I agree that it's possible to make a call-c/r strategy work against wide ranges, I think that most small stakes players would do better simply 3b'ing in those spots.
yeah I have to agree here.

If some loose BTN opens 65% you can not flat-call and hope to hit ... you must start 3betting or fight back on a lot of pots if you just flatcalls the entire range.
09-18-2010 , 06:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leader
I think this is a good theory, but tends to fail in practice. When an opponent opens a wide range, you should be 3-betting quite a few hands (A5o, 98s, ect.). Of course, these weak hands are going to tend to miss the flop frequently, which causes many players to c/c or c/f instead of c/r. So while I agree that it's possible to make a call-c/r strategy work against wide ranges, I think that most small stakes players would do better simply 3b'ing in those spots.
excellent post, and +1

      
m