Quote:
Originally Posted by Ixiterra
It's great that you can make hundreds or thousands of dollars an hour by playing just a couple tables, but for those of us without that kind of bankroll and/or skill, playing 4 tables of small stakes to make $15 an hour isn't exactly appealing. Not to mention a player pool orders of magnitude larger and harder to keep track of just by taking notes.
Oh, I see what you're saying. That's not really my argument, though. I don't really get the point of the first part of your post, this has nothing to do with me.
I'm mainly concerned here with the declining quality of games (the thing that people bitch about all the time). Basically I'm interested in slowing down the inevitable conclusion of the fate of online poker (inevitable insofar as I can't see a way to prevent the dissemination of all this information to more and more people) for as long as I can.
If you pay for "Premium" on PTR, you can see ridiculously detailed info on anybody you want over big samples (2.5 years or however long PTR has run). Not just the vpip/pfr stuff, but, like, everything. You can also filter the sample in many different ways, making it easier to adjust to changes in a person's playing style.
I'm pretty paranoid about some diligent reg that I play with every day breaking down my >500k sample on PTR and just knowing how I play in every spot.
Checkers was solved a year or two ago, which, even if the solution is unknowable/indecipherable by a human, hurt that game badly. Why would a novice want to learn a solved game? Why would a strong amateur continue to focus his attention on it?
KILL POLARIS
Quote:
Originally Posted by 175503
HUDs, no way, seriously that would destroy Pokerstars' income hardcore. Regs would play a lot less tables which just means EVERYONE would pay a lot less rake.
PTR is very crappy, though.
Yeah, depressingly enough, you're right, which is why I don't actually have a solution.
Last edited by DrElo; 02-28-2011 at 10:01 PM.