As Ive said, I think you are just not smart enough to realize you are racist.

Hey guys, why are you playing the race card? Just because I posted a fake racist article that talked about tiny African-American brains? Typical liberals. Besides just because I posted a fake article doesnt mean it couldnt have happened, ergo the evidence I presented was valid. Id post on another forum, but I was banned for my dissenting views. Woah is me.

This forum is the leper colony of twoplustwo, lol if you think you can get banned from here.

Terrible poster part is undoubtedly correct, ignorant and racist are probably better words than hateful most of the time (although your bitter stance towards government workers and OWS are pretty hateful)

If you did a poll of twoplustwoers on who thinks I deserved a racist ban for my one and only racist ban I think it would be less than 2%.

Not playing martyr tho

I am not dying for a cause. I am just saying that I'm not racist.

It's kinda crazy how some as racist as I am would spend half his time on 2+2 defending himself from being called racist...

You are socially conditioned enough to know racism is bad, but you are just too stupid to realize that you are a racist.

A lot of posters don't want people banned so you indeed may have some supporters.

More relevant, if you did a poll of two plus two regulars familiar with your history and asked if they agreed that you were both a racist and an idiot I'm betting you get at least 90% who agree.

To others with a more active brain pan, they would realize that there's only a small group of posters who spend half the time defending themselves from claims of racism... you, silverman2... a few others.

You'll notice the vast majority of people don't have to spend anytime defending themselves against claims that they're a racist.

Its almost as if there's a small group of posters who regularly make racist posts and most people don't. Weird how that is.

If the poll asked if my post was racist the number that would say yes would still be 2%.

I'm like 90% sure the whole bahbah is racist is just an elaborate troll, but I don't think I will ever find out.

I have no idea what post got you banned so I cannot speculate. But I recall your rathar lengthy history of discussions where it was pretty clear that you hold a lot of racist ideas. I also know that a LOT of readers have independently come to this conclusion about you.

Imagine the mental gymnastics it takes to believe that rather then YOU being racist, a website full of strangers have all agreed to pretend that you're a racist in an attempt to troll you. That seems likely.

For what its worth, I think letsgambool may be right that you may not be bright enough to even understand your own racism. The fact that when a large group of complete strangers all come to the conclusion that you're racist and you conclude that its an elaborate troll is pretty compelling evidence. While its not flattering to have your intelligence questioned at least it puts a bandaid on your racism.

I think bahbah got exiled just for being awful in general. Like he'd spew a bunch of derp, have his errors patiently explained to him with small words and simple sentences, and then a week later he'd waltz back into the same thread and spew the exact same derp as if the previous conversation never happened. Over and over and over and over.

Well, we learned why in this thread, he said he never bothered to learn much about the ACA yet was compelled to post 20 times a week in the ACA thread with supposedly detailed objections.

I recalling that aspect about him and I'm pretty sure I've mocked him for it before. I never thought that this would ever get him banned. Sticking your head up your bum and closing your eyes to everything that contradicts you is common enough. Being intentionally ignorant was never a ban-able offense.

He really was exceptional at it, though.

That might be true, but it has nothing to do with what we are talking about. I was just saying that 98% of 2+2ers would not think what I said (that got me a racist ban) was racist or slightly racist.

I still don't see a need to learn all the nuances of something to disagree with it or "post 20 times a week" about it. If I am against abortions why should I be expected to learn the nuances of how an abortion is performed to be able to disagree with them taking place?

The majority of regular twoplustwo posters would agree that you are racist.

Yeah, but I don't put too much weight into what a lot of you think since I was accused of being racist by a lot of you for a political viewpoint that was said to unequally hurt African-Americans while those same people support a raise in minimum wage, which unequally hurts African-Americans.

Tired of defending myself from ridiculous claims. I'm done.

Were you the one with the viewpoint that voter ID's should be given out with the cost deducted from government assistance payments?

Yes, when presented w/ the claim that poor people can't afford a $10 ID once every 5 years I suggestion to deduct it from there. However, If $10 every 5 years is too harsh we should allow a person in this situation to do $2 every year.


As you would expect with any idea that takes anything away from an old person, a sick person, a child, or a poor person my idea was met w/ heavy criticism. This is the reason entitlement reform is nearly impossible.

Lol at at trying to spite punish poor people for daring to exercise their right to vote.

So you don't have a problem w/ taking the money out of a gov't assistance program, you just have a problem w/ requiring them to have an ID to vote? If this is true, why did you ask about the idea to take $ out of the assistance to buy an ID?

I have zero problem with voter ID laws as long as the state gives out the ID for free and distributes the IDs widely for an extended period of time before an election requiring the ID and there is a way to vote provisionally without an ID just in case people still fall through the cracks.. Remember, voter ID laws are to ensure the integrity of elections, not to prevent the poor from voting right?

I honestly would probably kill myself if I was such a miserable ******* and so hateful towards the poor that I wanted to take $10 from someone on government assistance purely for spite.

There is no such thing as a free ID (or free healthcare for that matter) as someone will have to pay for them. So are you saying we should have the rich pay for poor people's IDs?

I realize this is a tough topic for you, just like any topic that lessens what we give to either a poor, old, young, or sick person. However, that shouldn't force you to stop using logic and start using emotional arguments.

I am not a miserable *******, hateful towards the poor or want to take money away from the poor out of spite.

Yes. I am saying taxpayers should pay for poor people's ID's if we are going to enact strict voter ID laws. Pretty obvious that we should not be stripping people of a fundamental right and that we have a responsiblity to make the voting process as inclusive as possible.

If the existing pool of taxes somehow does not allow for money to get ID's for poor people than we will take some of your money in the form of increased taxes and fund the ID dispersal that way.

Hope that's clear and unemotional enough.

bahbah, remember yesterday when I said you were exiled for repeatedly posting the exact same idiotic derp over and over and over? You're doing it again.

If we decided to quadruple all gov't assistance program checks would you still say we should take more money from the rich to pay for the IDs?