Quote:
Originally Posted by nostate
I think you would agree its illegitimate, in that private property cant exist without a state.
Well the bolded part is undeniably true. So, if they were consistent with their alleged anti-governmentness, your Libertarian-types would be anti-private-property, because they shouldn't view it as legitimate, as it requires a government.
Of course, LTers claim they are pro-private-property while at the same time claiming they're anti-government. Talk about an obvious self-contradiction. What a buncha clowns.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nostate
Never said he would be removed non-violent, just removed by whatever tactics they choose. You might not move if an old lady tells you to, but if two 6 foot body builders ask you, you may change your mind. Someone may call a private agency to remove them if for example the owner wanted no part in a potentially physical situation.
Yeah, well let's say an old lady landlord is extorting rent out of 100 households. If she can afford to hire two six-foot goons to extort that rent, and still run a profit by paying for it out of the rent extorted... well then those 100 households could easily pay 200 six-foot goons to use the exact same tactics against that old lady landlord in her own house, and pay for it all, several times over in fact, simply by withholding that rent.
Absentee landlords, at all times and places, absolutely require the protection of a government.