Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladesman87
No, no, no. You aren't playing this "where's the burden of proof" game with me.
I said it's below the threshold for detectability, meaning it's at least infrequent enough that you can't figure out it's going on. We aren't in disagreement about that.
This has been going on a while so I think I should summarize the convo for others. In this convo the "left" is a group of posters ITT that are mainly liberals.
left: voter IDs laws are racist and they don't serve a purpose
hero: why are voter ID laws racist?
left: because they hurt a higher % of one race than another
hero: every law does that
left: omg, you are racist
hero: how is saying that racist
left: one time hero accidently posted a racist article and then apologized for it saying it wasn't the article he meant to post and it was an onion-esqe knock off of the real article he didn't bother to read. he also apologized for posting such racist rubbish. That means everything he says for now on is racist
mod: please move on from the personal attacks
left: voter ID laws don't serve a purpose as there is no such thing as voter fraud
hero: <link to study that talks about a government agency making 100+ people vote for someone else and only 2 get caught - 1 or both of which were people were trying to get caught/ did no research as to who they were voting for> just because we can't catch it doesn't mean it doesn't happen
left: there was hundreds of thousands of voters in WI that wanted to vote but couldn't
hero: <link showing that the article about WI voters being disenfranchised is fake as the author's methodology is stupid beyond belief>
left: you don't have proof there is voter fraud
hero: i just posted proof it is nearly impossible to catch so yeah you are right i don't have proof
left: if you don't have proof it doesn't really exist
hero: that isn't true
left: if a tree fell in the forest you probably believe that it still makes a sound. hint: it doesn't because you don't have proof