Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
It's more complicated than that. While attitudes are definitely better, practice may not be so. Where people live is still pretty segregated. That is obviously due to racism. While there may be much less racist whites as far as attitude, that doesn't mean they are going to choose to live in a black or mixed neighborhood. Poor blacks obviously have no choice but to live in their neighborhoods.
.
Fyp..economics has a role, but much of that is due to racism also. Job segregation, and (still) housing segregation(many studies show minorities aren't shown the same number of houses in the nicer areas that Whites are when house shopping. Some don't even get a call at all(for rent or real estate) as sometimes the sound of their voice over the phone excludes them.
Quote:
Urban areas are just less racist. 50% of the US lives in cities now.
This doesn't mean they're less racist. They might be more integrated, primarily with non-Whites(which is far different meaning than less segregated).
Quote:
I firmly believe if the economics can be brought more in line, it'd bring the two groups together more because they'd have to live in shared communities more often
Many (White) communities are trying to protect their 'areas' via population density policy. It's the new way of saying only those already in a place have claim to the place. This submarines many housing project proposals for building more housing in those areas.
b