Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Standoff in Nevada, Is a "Range War" on the horizon? Standoff in Nevada, Is a "Range War" on the horizon?

04-27-2014 , 11:55 AM
First black editor of the Harvard Law Review? Psh, that's nothing.
04-27-2014 , 04:52 PM
Nothing wrong with "big ego" if it's a healthy ego. An unhealthy ego sucks regardless how it's size is characterized.
04-27-2014 , 08:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by problemeliminator
First black editor of the Harvard Law Review? Psh, that's nothing.
http://hlrecord.org/?p=11263

Can you find as many grammatical errors as I can?

You'd think that a Harvard Law Review Editor would not make subject-predicate errors.

(Approximately half of this first batch is chosen solely on their performance on the writing competition; the other half are selected on a weighted formula of 70 percent grades and 30 percent writing competition.)

I like this one…he seemingly can't make up his mind to which verb option is correct, so he tries both lol.
04-27-2014 , 08:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDuker

I don't think this is true either. But I'm not sure why you brought up Obama. What does he have to do with anything?

We've heard your "Obama is a street agitator" schtick before. Anytime somebody insults a black conservative, you stand ready with your defense, which invariably includes a comparison to the "whore" Obama.
Just to show Seattle Lou that the person he thinks is a wing nut is way more accomplished than his boy Obama.

He was a street agitator, I say it because it is true.

And I'm not saying Obama is a whore individually, I am saying the POTUS whoever it is is just a whore. Bush, Clinton, the next prez and on and on.
04-27-2014 , 09:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by problemeliminator
First black editor of the Harvard Law Review? Psh, that's nothing.
wrong.

president of Harvard Law Review. not editor. huge difference.
04-27-2014 , 09:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PFunkaliscious
wrong.

president of Harvard Law Review. not editor. huge difference.
What's the, uh, huge difference?
04-27-2014 , 10:21 PM
I'm sure Obama is heartbroken that he hasn't done enough to impress a scumbag coupon hawking sheeple.
04-27-2014 , 10:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silver_Man2
http://hlrecord.org/?p=11263

Can you find as many grammatical errors as I can?

You'd think that a Harvard Law Review Editor would not make subject-predicate errors.

(Approximately half of this first batch is chosen solely on their performance on the writing competition; the other half are selected on a weighted formula of 70 percent grades and 30 percent writing competition.)

I like this one…he seemingly can't make up his mind to which verb option is correct, so he tries both lol.
Anybody……. hello?????

HLR editor……


Hello?
04-27-2014 , 10:45 PM
Where are all the posters who give me **** for when i do this? ……………………………….

…..

…..

…..

Anybody, hello??? HLR editor Obama haves a problem with his simple grammar.
04-27-2014 , 10:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsGambool
I'm sure Obama is heartbroken that he hasn't done enough to impress a scumbag coupon hawking sheeple.
I has a problem with it because posters don't has a problem with Obama basing a problem with simple grammar. But then posters has a problem with Carson basing an ego, when carson haves beautiful grammar.
04-27-2014 , 11:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsGambool
I'm sure Obama is heartbroken that he hasn't done enough to impress a scumbag coupon hawking sheeple.
Good re-direct since you can't defend the prestigious HLR editor's ******ed writing ability.
04-27-2014 , 11:38 PM
And yet in spite of his obvious mental ******ation, Obama somehow beat out 18 other candidates to become President of the Law Review. Weird.

Does your mind really work this way? "Obama made some grammatical errors in a letter to the Editor in 1990, therefore Dr. Ben Carson is 85 times more accomplished." That's just pitiful.
04-28-2014 , 12:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silver_Man2
I has a problem with it because posters don't has a problem with Obama basing a problem with simple grammar. But then posters has a problem with Carson basing an ego, when carson haves beautiful grammar.
Silver, dude, where are you picking this **** up? We all know you don't know a goddamn thing about verb tenses, which means you're badly paraphrasing some chain email or Youtube.
04-28-2014 , 03:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDuker
And yet in spite of his obvious mental ******ation, Obama somehow beat out 18 other candidates to become President of the Law Review. Weird.
Were adults picking from the candidates?

He didn't even publish anything, right?

Last edited by Silver_Man2; 04-28-2014 at 04:05 AM.
04-28-2014 , 03:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Silver, dude, where are you picking this **** up? We all know you don't know a goddamn thing about verb tenses, which means you're badly paraphrasing some chain email or Youtube.
Wookie was viewing the thread after those last 3 posts I made on the previous page.

He didn't respond. So I think I am in the clear on this one.
04-28-2014 , 08:24 AM
wat?
04-28-2014 , 09:06 AM
04-28-2014 , 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silver_Man2
Were adults picking from the candidates?

He didn't even publish anything, right?
So you think Harvard Law students are incapable of critical thinking and sound decision-making. Got it.

Speaking of deflections, you've somehow got everybody talking about Obama instead of your former hero Clive Bundy, so congrats on that.

I guess if a lost Obama Law Review article surfaced that was reasonably well-written, you'd have to admit defeat, right? Like that alone would put him ahead of Carson? Or does it not work that way in reverse?

Let's get back to your deep thoughts on Bundy and why people like you don't want to talk about him anymore.
04-28-2014 , 11:27 AM
Bundy's comments for sure raised his stature in the eyes of silverbug.
04-28-2014 , 11:27 AM
Lol, donald trump came out in defense of don sterling on fox and friends. who's surprised?

the dude's basically a male palin at this point.
04-28-2014 , 05:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDuker

Let's get back to your deep thoughts on Bundy and why people like you don't want to talk about him anymore.
I don't like Bundy. This wasn't even a racial thing and he made it into one. He is a moron and a racist.

He is an old racist fool just like Harry Reid. Except Harry Reid is a corrupt, lying sewer rat.

Last edited by Silver_Man2; 04-28-2014 at 05:52 PM.
04-28-2014 , 05:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deuces McKracken
This is supported on some level by research. Across standard measures republicans appear only slightly more racists than democrats. But my guess is if you broadened the category to conservative or right wing instead of just republican then the gap would increase. And the studies I've seen don't measure the depth of racism but rather just make operational definitions which detect relatively mild racism. So if you think black people don't work as hard that would indicate some level of racism. But if you think black people should be wiped off the face of the earth then that opinion, although present in some degree among conservatives, won't even register.

There is also a dynamic where liberals might share a negative opinion or attitude about blacks but have completely different attribution tendencies when it comes to explaining the opinion. But if you just measure racism in simple responses you won't see that.
I would be completely comfortable betting that before Harry Reid's public life that he dropped relatively the same amount of N-bombs in private on average as Bundy.
04-28-2014 , 05:58 PM
Bold untestable wagers ITT.
04-28-2014 , 06:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Bold untestable wagers ITT.
True, obviously untestable.

But since when do any of you care about testing when it comes to racist accusations???

Hell, some of you even admit that racist undertones are worse than actual overt racism at soccer stadiums and what not, and casually blanket groups of people in certain regions as racist.

And you have a problem with me pointing out someone who I think is racist, and 1000% believe with no doubt that he has dropped plenty of N-bombs in his life? Just because he is your oh so preshus leader of the party you support?

      
m