Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The SJW thread The SJW thread

08-09-2017 , 10:57 PM


This is what he would of thought of trump. And probably did.
08-09-2017 , 11:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Clovis, get back in your crate. There's a good boy.
It's that's a good boy not there's a good boy genius.
08-09-2017 , 11:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by batair

This is what he would of thought of trump. And probably did.
And today, he'd be demonitized on YouTube. Things were simpler back then I suppose.
08-09-2017 , 11:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Let me ask - what would Carlin think of unelected Corporate Overmasters thought policing the Internet?
He would probably think that anybody who thought the bolded actually exist are raving lunatics.
08-09-2017 , 11:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
It's that's a good boy not there's a good boy genius.
Wrong, dumbass.


http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dict...d-boy-girl-dog

Quote:
Meaning of “there's a good boy/girl/dog!” in the English Dictionary

English
"there's a good boy/girl/dog!" in English

See all translations
there's a good boy/girl/dog!

mainly uk used to show approval or encouragement:
Tie your shoelaces, there's a good girl!
Now get back in your crate.
08-10-2017 , 12:20 AM
Are you british?
08-10-2017 , 12:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
He would probably think that anybody who thought the bolded actually exist are raving lunatics.
Did you watch any of his anti-Corporation videos JUST ****ING POSTED? Of course not, you don't watch videos. I mean, ****, even I had to refresh my Carlin. You might also review the Reagan video and his opinions on the FCC.
08-10-2017 , 02:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6ix
Yeah, I mean, the whole thing was mostly bull**** but that last part is what took it over the line into this-isn't-even-worth-taking-seriously territory.
no response to HU4rolls?

name the game hu nl, plo, lhe, limit O8e

don't talk **** about naming $ when you arn't willing to do anything
08-10-2017 , 03:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
And today, he'd be demonitized on YouTube. Things were simpler back then I suppose.
Things ain't what they used to be and never were. - Will Rogers
08-10-2017 , 03:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iron Tamer
no response to HU4rolls?

name the game hu nl, plo, lhe, limit O8e

don't talk **** about naming $ when you arn't willing to do anything

Ahahaah oh you were serious?

And here I was calling you one of the smart ones.

I honestly thought you were just doing a BBV callback considering you mentioned it the other day.

LOOOL
08-10-2017 , 04:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladesman87
The memo commits a lot of what future philosophers will call "Appeal to Chezness", in which the writer claims cutting out certain terms and using a whole bunch of the equivalent of "I'm not X but..." qualifiers somehow makes it a passing standard, and a shocked affectation can be taken when people suggest the writer might be hiding behind a thin veil.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
Everyone concedes that.




No. He was fired for saying that men and women are different in these specific ways, that these differences are important to the company's success, that these differences are biological and immutable and explain any disparity in hiring or wages. And then he concludes that direct attempts at increasing diversity are discriminatory unless that diversity means more conservatives. Then you can discriminate all you want.
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
Every single point he makes there and allows for a way to improve he follows up with a qualifier. "We could do X... I'm not saying that Google necessarily should, but that is one way." Again, of he isn't proposing solutions ( He isn't, all of his qualifiers contradict his supposed solutions) then what was the point of the screed other than "I am mad at the way that Google hires people, namely women, and here are some "scientific reasons" that women totally shouldn't represent more than the 1/3 of workers that are already represented at this company.
why don't you dopes actually quote him, make an honest interpretation of the content, and then criticize it? not a single attempt has been made that i've seen. just a bunch of mischaracterization and slander. its just so weak and pathetic. go ahead and make an honest and accurate point. pick apart his paper. its not going to happen because youre a bunch of bimbos
08-10-2017 , 04:40 AM
Ok...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iron Tamer
no response to HU4rolls?

name the game hu nl, plo, lhe, limit O8e

don't talk **** about naming $ when you arn't willing to do anything

Short answer:

Yeah sure, why not? Something Omaha. I'm from the US and you probably don't have an account on the few small US sites, which you know already and are using as a preemptive dodge, but yeah, sure.


Longer answer:

Where do I begin?

You do know I was asking about some manner of BrainPower4Rollz, considering you idiots calling everybody else idiots has just about run it's course and it's well past due for some humbling, right? That was the context. So either you didn't know that, and I kinda already won, or you did, and think the short-term variance of a HU poker match is the best metric for intelligence, which is kinda LOL. Unless you're talking about playing 50k hands or something? In which case, also LOL.

There isn't any pure measurement for intelligence but some things work better than others. Adult IQ tests kinda suck but they're sorta universal so they get mentioned. College entrance exams are good knowledge-based tests but those differ from country to country. Canada, remember? Childhood IQ tests are great for what they're meant to do, but very few people actually get the chance to take them. I'm a very good Chess player and a decent Go player but those have wild fluctuations in ability that have little to do with intelligence. Backgammon and Scrabble are two great games like Poker that require skill and smarts but also can have high variance in the short term.

Basically, that entire paragraph is filled with examples better than small-sample HU poker, that would also take far less time than a HU poker match.

Hell, we could just ask people to vote. Do you have confidence in your posting, that it's displayed your dazzling intelligence to the point that you have no qualms using the topic to insult people?

The point is, it doesn't have to be a good metric for intelligence, just one we agree upon.

Are you aware you're closing the negotiations with your last post? Not to brag or anything, but it might occur to an intelligent person to ask if HU poker is sufficient, or, should the negotiation continue, rather than say, for example, "don't talk **** about naming $ when you arn't willing to do anything." Maybe I wasn't willing to play HU poker, or couldn't due to geographical limitations, or some other reasons related to the quasilegality of online poker. HU poker is "one thing," not "anything."

Using "anything" in that instance just makes you look kinda stupid, if I'm being perfectly honest.

In fact, because of all the "other things" that are "not" HU poker, as in, infinite things if we allow ourselves to just create intelligence tests and agree to them, it occurs to me you're actually the one who isn't "willing to do anything," considering you seem to have your mind made up on "one thing" which is, HU poker, and we round up.

It's kinda like how 0.999 repeating = 1.

It also occurs to me that an intelligent person might've considered all of the above before replying again, but like I said, these tests aren't perfect.

We could use it though. We could have people just read this interaction and have that serve as the bet. They could decide who is dumber. Me, for typing all of this to such a ****ing idiot as yourself and assuming it wouldn't all be wasted, or you, for, well, obvious reasons.

Let me know if you have any other "thoughts" about the topic.

Last edited by 6ix; 08-10-2017 at 04:49 AM. Reason: lol
08-10-2017 , 04:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
why don't you dopes actually quote him, make an honest interpretation of the content, and then criticize it? not a single attempt has been made that i've seen. just a bunch of mischaracterization and slander. its just so weak and pathetic. go ahead and make an honest and accurate point. pick apart his paper. its not going to happen because youre a bunch of bimbos
That's because you're basically illiterate.

That's not even a joke or an insult, though it might be "mean".

You've proven time and again you simply can't parse information from text well enough to have a conversation.

It's to the point that when I said you were a beta-test chatbot from the 90s, I was only kinda joking.
08-10-2017 , 04:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6ix
That's because you're basically illiterate.

That's not even a joke or an insult, though it might be "mean".

You've proven time and again you simply can't parse information from text well enough to have a conversation.

It's to the point that when I said you were a beta-test chatbot from the 90s, I was only kinda joking.
your post lacks a thing called evidence. next time you have a clever rebuttal, try to include something relevant

i just skimmed passed your last post. i dont know if you just took meds or you need meds, but get help. im serious
08-10-2017 , 05:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
your post lacks a thing called evidence. next time you have a clever rebuttal, try to include something relevant

i just skimmed passed your last post. i dont know if you just took meds or you need meds, but get help. im serious
Oh snap my bad homeboy, here's the, uh, evidence:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...ostcount=14555
08-10-2017 , 05:44 AM
lol
08-10-2017 , 05:48 AM
I've literally told that story to IRL friends and associates.

Like, "This one time, this dude asked me specifically for a personal anecdote, I provided one, then he got upset and chastised me for providing a personal anecdote as if that was dodging the question. It was one of the most amazingly dumb interactions I've ever been a part of."
08-10-2017 , 07:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
why don't you dopes actually quote him, make an honest interpretation of the content, and then criticize it? not a single attempt has been made that i've seen. just a bunch of mischaracterization and slander. its just so weak and pathetic. go ahead and make an honest and accurate point. pick apart his paper. its not going to happen because youre a bunch of bimbos
I quoted him several times including the first post after FoldN posted about this subject. Moron.
08-10-2017 , 07:54 AM
Quote:
Altzi shock, but have nothing to strike awe.
That is pretty good.
08-10-2017 , 10:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
I quoted him several times including the first post after FoldN posted about this subject. Moron.
you quoted the memo and accurately characterized the content? feel free to show you work. i havent seen it

all ive seen is a lack of quotes and content of the memo and a bunch of general mischaracterizations here
08-10-2017 , 10:21 AM
this is 2p2 how else would we decide other than 1vs1 poker? I have money on black chip poker which is USA facing. Why would I want to dodge a poker match in my specialty

what do you suggest to prove intelligence or are you just flailing your mouth in the wind
08-10-2017 , 10:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iron Tamer
this is 2p2 how else would we decide other than 1vs1 poker? I have money on black chip poker which is USA facing. Why would I want to dodge a poker match in my specialty

what do you suggest to prove intelligence or are you just flailing your mouth in the wind
Just... Wow.
08-10-2017 , 11:01 AM
big talker super scared when somebody takes him up on it

classic lol
08-10-2017 , 11:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
you quoted the memo and accurately characterized the content? feel free to show you work. i havent seen it



all ive seen is a lack of quotes and content of the memo and a bunch of general mischaracterizations here


So you advocate reading it? Is it not fake news though?
08-10-2017 , 11:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
you quoted the memo and accurately characterized the content? feel free to show you work. i havent seen it
I did.

But this is a hilarious demand from a guy who posts Youoobz as citations.

      
m