Yeah, I mean, if your boss says "Any questions?" the response "Can I piss on a desk?" is one that'll get you in trouble in a lot of workplaces. So when someone points out "only the right questions can be asked" as though it's supposed to be a surprise, that makes you look weird because everyone knows that's the case.

No, I meant women in your personal life. It's why I personalized the question. Do you know any women?

To the women in my life, to understand that there are differences between the sexes is common sense. Why, do you associate yourself with stupid women?

As one of my women friends tells me "Why would I want to be equal to man? I don't want to lower myself."

how many people have come out and blasted him on the science

he is correct in his statements, they are rather tame ones at that

Another question you refuse to answer then. I will throw it on the pile

It's truly amazing. We're seeing the unhitching of terms "left" & "right" from any meaning whatsoever. We're seeing RWNJs arguing for "free speech" in the workplace, and strict ideological hiring quotas. We're seeing, if not the end of history, perhaps the end of coherence in history.

how many have supported the his "science"?

Oh man, this just keeps getting better...

So... what's our most likely timeline given this new information? I'm going with...

* Our hero the fool does decide, by whatever twitches his little lizard brain commands, that Friday would be a good day to get fired by epic foolishness. So spews his bile, and smashes "send all". Near the speed of light, he starts getting blowback. Suddenly, his clever little OSJer stunt seems to be backfiring on him. Suddenly, he finds himself outside of his fantasyland imaginations about OSJers-v-SJWers and "virtue signalling".

Suddenly our hero, the fool, realizes he's actually going to get the boot.

for real tho, I have not seen any discussion about the science. this guy briefly touches upon it.

https://medium.com/@yonatanzunger/so...o-1e3773ed1788

For people like jiggy women are basically slaves who should shut up, be pregnant and cook them dinner.

are you dumb or what is going on here? that is the worst cite I've ever seen. You should be embarrassed for quoting that

what is that supposed to mean

just an embarrassing quote

dude, you have not presented a single thing saying that the "science" in that guys screed is correct. you think we are supposed to just accept it?

like, we gotta believe it until it is proven incorrect or some article comes out with data refuting it?

he posted his thoughts, the world has seen it now to to our current outrage culture its about to the community to debunk him thats how it works

if given the level of notoriety of his memorandum there is no through rebuke you can rest assured his statements are true. Of course you are to accept it just like how you accept general relativity. Statements and arguments presented in this open fashion need to be debunked or they are de facto true.

We know from discussions in this forum that he is incorrect in saying that there is no gender pay gap.

He lists a lot of differences between the sexes, but seems to conclude that they are all biological, certain and important. So it's not the research he is citing that people have a problem with.

One big problem with his biological determinism argument is that it appears that personality can be changed.

I don't know what memoranda you read but he talks in terms of ranges.

if he talked in that black/white as in "no women ever makes good engineers" he woulda gotten rekt in seconds even before this came to the light of the world

you think with the hordes of altzis scrambling to support this clown, if his "science" was actually true, they wouldnt have already presented tons of articles supporting his "truths and facts"?

see, it certainly goes both ways.

guess we are back at square one. I do think someone will come along and address this.

until he is debunked, us saying that his statements are clearly fact are in the right

when something this public, this controversial and has been out this long in the social media age and no proper refutation is had its most likely correct

this is not square one, I don't understand how you think this is a hard concept

Oh lol, I just realized these people don't know what 'systems biology' is.

They think dude had an advanced degree in B***hes Be crazy.

Arguing with a Leftist - a short explanation.

Rational Person: "In general, these things are sort of true. I've personally observed them and they seem to be reasonable conclusions."
Leftist: "CITATION?!! WHERE'S YOUR CITATION? GIVE ME 20 PEER REVIEWED EMPIRICAL STUDIES DETAILING THE STATISTICAL LIKELIHOOD THAT THIS IS TRUE."
Rational Person: "Um, ok....but I just said water was wet."
Leftist: "CITATION!@?!?!"


Rational Person: "Hey, here is a well researched opinion with multiple citations. These facts and statistics might make you uncomfortable, but maybe we can work out how to address these issues."
Leftist: "DON"T SAY THAT, MY FEELINGS ARE HURT."
Rational Person: "Ok, perhaps we can take some concrete steps to address actual disparities in our in our society."
Leftist: "DIDN'T YOU HEAR ME, I TOLD YOU MY FEELINGS ARE HURT. I NEED A DAY OFF."

I feel like global warming is not happing.

I mean, it doesnt work this way. you know this. anyone with half a brain understands this.

and again, I cant imagine you are so clueless that you fail to understand this swings both ways. if this is so controversial then plenty of articles would have been presented that provided proof of his statements.

its really not that hard.

but I havent seen any articles addressing the "science." it must not be that interesting.

It's amazing jiggy honestly thinks anecdote is the strongest form of evidence. He is such a perfect distillation of why trump is president it is unbelievable.

100% jiggy has uttered a version of "I can balance my checkbook why can't the government balance the budget."

Jesus it's truly difficult to decide which of these posts is most full of stupid

It's easy - it's any one you start.