Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The SJW thread The SJW thread

08-06-2017 , 09:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iron Tamer
... the civil war was to keep the union togethor and thats pretty much it
No. There was an even more important goal: Defending white supremacy after the inevitable end of chain slavery.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
The Haitian Revolution (French: Révolution haïtienne [ʁevɔlysjɔ̃ ajisjɛ̃n]) was a successful anti-slavery and anti-colonial insurrection by self-liberated slaves against French colonial rule in Saint-Domingue, now the sovereign nation of Haiti. It began in 1791 and ended in 1804 with the former colony's independence. It was the only slave uprising that led to the founding of a state, which was both free from slavery, and ruled by non-whites and former captives. With the recent increase in Haitian Revolutionary Studies, it is now widely seen as a defining moment in the history of racism in the Atlantic World...
08-06-2017 , 09:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Clovis, you are an indoctrinated fool. Go back to your echo-chamber.

This is the free-thinker forum.
Literally a few days ago there was a battle royale where me, clovis, microbet and a few others were at each other's throats over a thing.

I've literally never seen you and the band of merry deplorables even type a sideways word to each other.

So, for the literally trifecta, literally everything you people say is projection of some sort.


To add, I agree with the following 110%:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
You don't know because it's a made up word by the dumbest fraction of the least intelligent segment of the right wing internet. It has meaning only in their minds. To them it means anyone who doesn't hate all minorities.

Apparently we can totally agree on many things and totally disagree on some things. What a poorly functioning echo chamber!
08-06-2017 , 10:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
No, not at all. An OSJer is simply shorthand for {set of peeps who whine about SJWs}. It's an apt name, as these OSJers are opposed to the war for justice and society that they accuse these SJWers of waging. But it's just a name, you could call {set of peeps who whine about SJWs} a "baby's arm holding an apple", if you wish. Whatever floats your boat.



That's the whole point of this thread... to get these OSJers to spit out WTF they imagine they mean. So... stay tuned, I guess.



But you're not. Sad.



Uh, just not being a OSJer will reduce the amount of peeps who find you "super annoying and/or fun to laugh at depending on the situation." If you just could find a way to keep all this OSJer crap under your hat... you'd be 1000% better off.

08-06-2017 , 10:04 PM
So... it seems that the simple question "who" bring this whole SJWer conspiracy theory to it's knees. OSJers... what a buncha fools. Let's see how we're going with the most basic of reporting here... regarding this whole SJWer thingee...
  • Who: Who are these SJWers? Are there any active in Baja Politards? Are they as rare as gingers, or as common as brunettes? Can we say anything about these SJWers at all??

  • What: What do these SJWers do? Well, besides annoy the crap out of our oh-so-sensitive OSJers. But other than allegedly being annoying over the interwebs... do these IRL SJWers actually do anything IRL ??

  • Where: ??
  • When: ??
  • How: ??

  • Why: This is always the ultimate stumper for all conspiracy theories... why bother to act as a conspiracy in the first place? What's the flippin' point ??
08-06-2017 , 10:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6ix
Literally a few days ago there was a battle royale where me, clovis, microbet and a few others were at each other's throats over a thing.

I've literally never seen you and the band of merry deplorables even type a sideways word to each other.

So, for the literally trifecta, literally everything you people say is projection of some sort.


To add, I agree with the following 110%:




Apparently we can totally agree on many things and totally disagree on some things. What a poorly functioning echo chamber!
Oh yeah, that thing where Fly got banned for racism.

LOL. The irony.
08-06-2017 , 10:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Oh yeah, that thing where Fly got banned for racism.

LOL. The irony.
The real lesson there is that I'm pretty much always right.
08-06-2017 , 10:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
By "posted above" you mean in a different thread?



Ok, I found it. The repercussions so far are that someone else wrote a memo saying they didn't agree with that memo. Sounds like a lot of free speech happening.



I read Haidt because of you and it was relatively bad. I think I reviewed it in the politics book review thread. He whines about very unspecific things and non-events where I guess children make him uncomfortable sometimes. And don't hit me with examples. You don't get to pick the worst 10 examples from a country with 300 million people and call it a phenomenon. Remember the flesh eating bacteria epidemic?



Now your Facebook feed is what's wrong with this country?



But, this is all belongs in the free speech thread I guess.



ST has a point that you guys ought to be able to come up with a better definition of SJW than "is similar to the kind of people who have comfort dogs" and if the description includes whining about people having different opinions that's going to be a pretty tough thing to define while not implicated yourself. I guess BroadwaySushy et al get bent out of shape about other people's opinions in a really manly way, so they're not snowflakes.

I'm sorry you think Haidt's book was "bad", I'll have to read your review. I think it's likely that he knows a bit more than you about this subject though. I hope you haven't found an error or two in his analyses and chosen to toss the whole thing out using the same sort of motivated reasoning he describes threatens to ruin the humanities.

As far as trying to narrow down a true definition of "SJW", I'm not going to be much help. It appears to have sprung out from the internet void in response to many similarly ill-defined terms you'll find on social justice tumbler or reddit. It means different things to different people, but seems to have congealed into a derogative, and attempts to salvage it are about as likely as alt right meaning anything but neofascist. Sometimes it's critics of a particular movement who end up defining the terms. So it goes.
08-06-2017 , 10:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6ix
Literally a few days ago there was a battle royale where me, clovis, microbet and a few others were at each other's throats over a thing.

I've literally never seen you and the band of merry deplorables even type a sideways word to each other.

So, for the literally trifecta, literally everything you people say is projection of some sort.


To add, I agree with the following 110%:





Apparently we can totally agree on many things and totally disagree on some things. What a poorly functioning echo chamber!
Yeah, kind of like a lover's quarrel more like. Clovis got his tits in a tangle and stormed off in a huff. Then you all kissed and made up.

Doesn't change the fact that it's a sycophantic echo-chamber 99% of the time.

And Fly outing himself as a racist was a real hoot.

Last edited by BroadwaySushy; 08-06-2017 at 10:50 PM.
08-06-2017 , 11:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iron Tamer
oh yeah and the idea that you needed to kill 750k soldiers and more civilians in order to end slavery in the south is ridiculous, slavery ended everywhere else in the world in short order without a war. Even brazil an entire country built on plantation labour ended slavery without bloodshed.

the civil war was to keep the union togethor and thats pretty much it
I agree,. It was pretty stupid of the South to start that war to preserve slavery since it was destined to end anyway.
08-06-2017 , 11:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Yeah, kind of like a lover's quarrel more like. Clovis got his tits in a tangle and stormed off in a huff. Then you all kissed and made up.

Doesn't change the fact that it's a sycophantic echo-chamber 99% of the time.

And Fly outing himself as a racist was a real hoot.
I never said Fly is an antisemite and I don't think he is.

You would never get this, but there is a lot of disagreement among the decent people in alpha. Trumpkins are just for the entertainment and trolling. You guys collectively make me sad for the state of the world, but individually none of the people who have ever actually bothered me on 2p2, like Fly, are Trumpkins.
08-06-2017 , 11:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Yeah, kind of like a lover's quarrel more like. Clovis got his tits in a tangle and stormed off in a huff. Then you all kissed and made up.

Doesn't change the fact that it's a sycophantic echo-chamber 99% of the time.

And Fly outing himself as a racist was a real hoot.
Pop quiz: Is 99 a smaller number than 100?
08-06-2017 , 11:40 PM
I've posted this before but I sort of like the emergence of the term SJW because it is so valuable at identifying the least intelligent people on the internet. It really is a useful marker.
08-06-2017 , 11:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
I've posted this before but I sort of like the emergence of the term SJW because it is so valuable at identifying the least intelligent people on the internet. It really is a useful marker.
It's the verbal equivalent of coal-rolling. It's not just a sign of being stupid, it's a sign of being aggressively stupid.
08-06-2017 , 11:55 PM
Shame Trolly, you don't really seem qualified to speak on this subject and your posts demonstrate significant misunderstandings.

It's like you want to talk physics without believing in physics.

"Ok guys, I believe in magic faerie dust, but I'm going to categorize everyone into either Quantum Mechanics or String Theory believers."

Quantum Mechanics: JiggyMac
String Theory: Microbet
Magic Faerie Dust: Shame Trolly

Now, Quantum Mechanics is stupid, because String Theory is obviously correct. I mean, I'm a Magic Faerie Dust kind of guy, but the String Theorists are onto something.
08-07-2017 , 12:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Shame Trolly, you don't really seem qualified to speak on this subject and your posts demonstrate significant misunderstandings...
LOL @this. I'm 100% qualified to call BS on obvious BS.

Quote:
...It's... physics... physics... I believe in magic faerie dust... Quantum Mechanics or String Theory... Quantum Mechanics: JiggyMac String Theory: Microbet Magic Faerie Dust: Shame Trolly... Now, Quantum Mechanics... String Theory... Magic Faerie Dust... String Theorists... onto something.
OK sure. Why don't we start from scratch ~1700 posts into this thread. You can explain to me how this whole SJWer thingee works. Remember to explain it to me live I'm a 5yo.

Let's start from square #1: Is SJWing something a peep does -or- is a SJWer something a peep can be ??
08-07-2017 , 12:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
LOL @this. I'm 100% qualified to call BS on obvious BS.



OK sure. Why don't we start from scratch ~1700 posts into this thread. You can explain to me how this whole SJWer thingee works. Remember to explain it to me live I'm a 5yo.

Let's start from square #1: Is SJWing something a peep does -or- is a SJWer something a peep can be ??
Shame Trolly: I am qualified to call BS on those Round Earthers. I know BS when I see it.
08-07-2017 , 12:15 AM
You are free to start here if you like:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_justice_warrior

It's not a 5yo level, but I assume you're old enough to be on the internet, so here you go.

Notice this phrase here:
"Use of the term has been described as attempting to degrade the motivations of the person accused of being an SJW, implying that their motives are "for personal validation rather than out of any deep-seated conviction"."

Which kind of goes back to when you were "organizing against racists", whatever the **** that meant.
08-07-2017 , 12:32 AM
What's fascinating Shame is that you're literally SJWing about SJWism....

"I don't really believe in what I'm talking about, but let me hear what you have to say on the subject."
08-07-2017 , 12:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
... "Use of the term has been described as attempting to degrade the motivations of the person accused of being an SJW, implying that their motives are "for personal validation rather than out of any deep-seated conviction"...
Well, let's see if this even makes a lick-o-sense. Let's leave aside feminism/etc, and focus on something we know is more important: sports. I've been to my share of big-time sporting events: World Series, CFB Championships, NFL playoffs, MLB & NBA All-Star games, winter ball in TJ/etc.

I've seen players & coaches & vendors & fans cry. I've cried. But I once took this ungrateful slut to a World Series game... and she whined the whole way through the damn game. But... she was happy to tell all her friends she had real expensive seats to the big game the next day.

Was she the sports equivalent of a SJWer ??
08-07-2017 , 12:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
Well, let's see if this even makes a lick-o-sense. Let's leave aside feminism/etc, and focus on something we know is more important: sports. I've been to my share of big-time sporting events: World Series, CFB Championships, NFL playoffs, MLB & NBA All-Star games, winter ball in TJ/etc.

I've seen players & coaches & vendors & fans cry. I've cried. But I once took this ungrateful slut to a World Series game... and she whined the whole way through the damn game. But... she was happy to tell all her friends she had real expensive seats to the big game the next day.

Was she the sports equivalent of a SJWer ??
Was this her?

http://www.barstoolsports.com/newyor...f-strike-outs/



Rumor has it, she's working on her Masters degree.
08-07-2017 , 01:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Was this her?



http://www.barstoolsports.com/newyor...f-strike-outs/







Rumor has it, she's working on her Masters degree.


As sad as that tweet is, the Braves would have had to make the World Series in the past 17 years to work for ST's story.
08-07-2017 , 01:26 AM
lol that tweet from her replying to a black guy

"you must not care about your race as much as I care about yours"

that is sjw in a nutshell
08-07-2017 , 01:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by StevenPoke
As sad as that tweet is, the Braves would have had to make the World Series in the past 17 years to work for ST's story.
He could have taken her to a different series. She obviously didn't care about the game anyway.
08-07-2017 , 01:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
I've posted this before but I sort of like the emergence of the term SJW because it is so valuable at identifying the least intelligent people on the internet. It really is a useful marker.
I tend to go by screen-names myself.

Clovis8 is probably one of the dumbest, most boring names I've ever come across.

It just screams "I'm a plonker".
08-07-2017 , 02:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
He could have taken her to a different series. She obviously didn't care about the game anyway.
I said it was a World Series game... not a regular season game from this season. I haven't been to the Braves new stadium yet, however I did take Sabo to the last dog game in Turner Field last September.

I also googled this Sania Kay peep... and came up with -zilch-. AFAICT he's not a public figure, and is basically a nobody. Looks hot enough in the little pix I guess.

Isn't this basically less newsworthy than this railroad engine...



Quote:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
The GE C44-9W is a 4,400 hp (3,281 kW) diesel-electric locomotive... BNSF 666 renumbered to BNSF 599 in 2003 due to suspicion...
What happened is that peeps unknown kept vandalizing this engine, and crews kept refusing to operate it. That was until they renumbered it to 599 from 666.

How come you fools aren't all spazzing out over this shiz ??

      
m