You don't know because it's a made up word by the dumbest fraction of the least intelligent segment of the right wing internet. It has meaning only in their minds. To them it means anyone who doesn't hate all minorities.

hey Clovis8, good to see another SJW in denial here. Such a pathetic bunch you guys are.

Any more SJW regs from the politics forum want to stop by?

Clovis, you are an indoctrinated fool. Go back to your echo-chamber.

This is the free-thinker forum.

Im a social justice warrior. but I guess I didnt make the list for regs.

OKVG. Now got three whole identified SJWers. Here's our tally so far...

OSJer -o- SJWer	Count	Details
Opponents of Social Justice (OSJers)	11	ToothSayer, Marn, and 9 others identified above ITT.
Neutrals	1	Shame Trolly !!!1!.
Social Justice Warriors (SJWers)	3	Clovis8, JohnyCrash, Victor.
(as yet unclassified regs)	46	On this list.

However, maybe it would speed things along if you'd identify more than one per post. You euro-trash can be so strange at times. Don't get me started with what you fools get into in those hostels. Anyways, how about our esteemed mods here in Baja... are they SJWers ??

Is chezlaw a SJWer?
Is whosnext a SJWer?
Is well named a SJWer?

Sign me up for #teamSJW

I'm on #teamDeplorable.

As long as it doesn't mean having to call people names or hating anybody then count me in on #teamSJW

It it implies or requires hatefulness then I'm in the anti camp.

It's not a binary. There are other options besides being an opponent of social justice, like the OSJer FoldnDark -vs- a social justice warrior, like the SWJer JohnyCrash. You can always be neutral, like me. Updated tally...

12 OSJers ~ w/BroadwaySushi
1 Neutral ~ me
4 SJWers ~ w/well named
44 ~ (unclassified regs)

You seem to have confused being anti SJW with being anti SJ.

It all depends what the W entails. it it doesn't require hatefulness or name calling then count me in for #teamSJW.

I prefer to be an SJW as well, but I hate it when I'm confused for one of the much more vocal, ubiquitous and reta... er, stoopid "SJWs" who most sane people find super annoying and/or fun to laugh at depending on the situation. It's a struggle.

So it does all come down to the college kids?

Let's expand ST's list?

SJW or not?

MLK
James Baldwin
Malcolm X
Angela Davis
Noam Chomsky
Hannah Arendt
Caesar Chavez
Eugene Debs
Sacheen Littlefeather

No, not at all. An OSJer is simply shorthand for {set of peeps who whine about SJWs}. It's an apt name, as these OSJers are opposed to the war for justice and society that they accuse these SJWers of waging. But it's just a name, you could call {set of peeps who whine about SJWs} a "baby's arm holding an apple", if you wish. Whatever floats your boat.

That's the whole point of this thread... to get these OSJers to spit out WTF they imagine they mean. So... stay tuned, I guess.

But you're not. Sad.

Uh, just not being a OSJer will reduce the amount of peeps who find you "super annoying and/or fun to laugh at depending on the situation." If you just could find a way to keep all this OSJer crap under your hat... you'd be 1000% better off.

SJW is a generic term for snowflake liberals.

The crybaby types with their comfort dogs and cuddle blankies.

And the shout everyone down types.

Here's a picture of one.

Well, once again we get a whole new & different definition of SJWer. We've segued from having not "stood up" to "real" r-word-ism... to service dog ownership patterns. Amazing... truly amazing how the lizard brain of these OSJers happens to twitch.

Now, it seems, that these SJWers need to IRL possesse an (alleged) working dog... one of the 'comfort dog' variety. So... to fill in our chart... we first need to know which Baja Politards own dogs, and which of those (alleged) they own service dogs ??

I meant figuratively not literally, dumbass.

It's a type not a rigid specification. As in generic. Get it?

Snowflake covers the same sort of ground.

No, as I told OP, it appears the college kids are just a symptom of the greater problem. Or rather, they're the most obvious manifestations, along with gobs of social media warriors. But this close-minded reactionary orthodoxy setting in on the left has much more far-reaching roots. See college professors described by Haidt and DeBoer. See the push back at Google posted in the free speech thread.

I won't go through your list one by one, but many if not all of them I would be more likely to categorize as legit SJWs not "SJWs". They actually fought for a cause sincerely.

An "SJW" would be more likely to reference those people's thoughts and actions when convenient, but when confronted with their words like "judged by the content of their character, rather than the color of their skin," resort to some form of personal attack to obfuscate how they just used concepts like whitesplaining to do the exact opposite. Soon enough MLK will be tossed under the bus, watch. To wit, I would consider Abe Lincoln to be a real SJW, but I noticed on my Facebook feed recently even he's being tossed to the wolves as an incorrigible racist.

That's funny, because that slut must have flip-flopped. I got the same slut being all OSJer in my gif-bucket...



Anyways, what's with you deplorables. It's like you are all stupid of something. Nobody is asking for made up memes ITT. We're trying to get to the bottom of who the heck these pesky SJWers are ITF. So how about you making like a good little deplorable, and help fill in the chart in question below...

Poster	OSJer	Neutral	SJWer
Abbaddabba
aoFrantic
batair
Black Peter
Bladesman87
chezlaw
Deuces McKracken
DoOrDoNot
einbert
FlyWf
goofyballer
HastenDan
jalfrezi
Jbrochu
JiggsCasey
jjshabado
kioshk
kerowo
leavesofliberty
Mat Sklansky
Max Cut
microbet
mongidig
Noodle Wazlib
Original Position
Paul D
pokerodox
Regret$
samsonh
SenorKeeed
superslug
sylar
Teh Jabber-Wookie
TheMadcap
The REAL Trolly
TiltedDonkey
Trolly McTrollson
whosnext
wil318466
Zeno
13ball
2OutsNoProb
5ive
57 On Red

Well, I gave it my best shot. You did ask, by the way.

If it's not good enough for you, then go **** yourself.

off topic but

abe lincoln was a racist

I don't understand why either side likes him, for the left he disliked blacks and wished to deport them all to africa ala Liberia and only made the emancipation proclamation to prevent the British from entering the war

for the right he massively expanded government power, suspended basic rights like due process and fought a completely unnecessary war which cost an enormous amount of lives just to keep the union together

yet this warmongering dictator is constantly rated high in the list of best presidents. Its good he got assassinated he deserved it.

oh yeah and the idea that you needed to kill 750k soldiers and more civilians in order to end slavery in the south is ridiculous, slavery ended everywhere else in the world in short order without a war. Even brazil an entire country built on plantation labour ended slavery without bloodshed.

the civil war was to keep the union togethor and thats pretty much it

By "posted above" you mean in a different thread?

Ok, I found it. The repercussions so far are that someone else wrote a memo saying they didn't agree with that memo. Sounds like a lot of free speech happening.

I read Haidt because of you and it was relatively bad. I think I reviewed it in the politics book review thread. He whines about very unspecific things and non-events where I guess children make him uncomfortable sometimes. And don't hit me with examples. You don't get to pick the worst 10 examples from a country with 300 million people and call it a phenomenon. Remember the flesh eating bacteria epidemic?

Now your Facebook feed is what's wrong with this country?

But, this is all belongs in the free speech thread I guess.

ST has a point that you guys ought to be able to come up with a better definition of SJW than "is similar to the kind of people who have comfort dogs" and if the description includes whining about people having different opinions that's going to be a pretty tough thing to define while not implicated yourself. I guess BroadwaySushy et al get bent out of shape about other people's opinions in a really manly way, so they're not snowflakes.

and sjw is like a fish

I'll know it when I see it

if you sit down at the table and you don't see the sjw, well then sir you are the sjw