Quote:
Originally Posted by uke_master
So not only are you entirely buying into their terminology...
I'm not "buying into their terminology" at all. These fools are saying there's a set of IRL peeps that do some IRL thingees, that make the OSJers all bitter. They call this IRL set of peeps SJWers. I want to explore who exactly, among us Baja Politards, are in this IRL set of peeps.
All I'm doing is this... OSJers == {peeps who whine about alleged SJWers}. That's not buying into anything.
Quote:
... you are letting them self identify...
Again, no just no. I'm not "letting them self identify". I'm doing exactly the opposite. I'm eliminating self-identification completely from the situation.
Quote:
... We don't have to make up new terms just because they are going to whine about being called what they are.
Well. I'm sure who "we" are, unless you have a mouse in your pocket. My only interest is to sort this finite set of Baja Politards into three subsets: (a) those that whine about SJWers. I'm calling this set OSJers... which seems to be causing you some heartache. Call it something else, if that makes you more happy, I guess. (b) Neutrals like myself. And (c) the set of peeps who peeps who call others SJWers are referring to. Again, I called this subset "SJWers", but YMMV.
{set} | my name of {set} | your name of {set} |
---|
A=={peeps who call other peeps SJWers} | OSJers | Alt-Righters ?? |
B=={peeps that (peeps who call other peeps SJWers) are referring to} | SJWers | ?? |
not-in (A union B) | <Neutrals> | ?? |