Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The SJW thread The SJW thread

08-04-2017 , 08:04 PM
More SJWism.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz:

I didn't act on my criminal IT staff, because I was concerned they were being racially profiled. WTF?!?!?!

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/pol...802-story.html

Which excuse are you morons going to trot out?

1) Well, she has a point.
2) I don't know who DWS is and why does a congresswoman and former head of the DNC matter to anyone.
3) The systemic oppression of blah blah blah...
4) Well, Trump
5) Only white males are capable of committing crimes because of the patriarchy.

Go on, I'll wait....
08-04-2017 , 08:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
More SJWism.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz:

I didn't act on my criminal IT staff, because I was concerned they were being racially profiled. WTF?!?!?!

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/pol...802-story.html

Which excuse are you morons going to trot out?

1) Well, she has a point.
2) I don't know who DWS is and why does a congresswoman and former head of the DNC matter to anyone.
3) The systemic oppression of blah blah blah...
4) Well, Trump
5) Only white males are capable of committing crimes because of the patriarchy.

Go on, I'll wait....
How bout, You're a ****ing idiot?
08-04-2017 , 08:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
How bout, You're a ****ing idiot?
Excellent response from such a small mind. I expected nothing less.
08-04-2017 , 08:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
How bout, You're a ****ing idiot?
I thought the correct play was to use racist instead of idiot.
08-04-2017 , 08:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by campfirewest
I thought the correct play was to use racist instead of idiot.


Racism isn't a game.
08-04-2017 , 08:31 PM
Sounds legit.




DWS. Taking unhinged to a whole new level.

Last edited by BroadwaySushy; 08-04-2017 at 08:51 PM.
08-04-2017 , 08:43 PM
Oh, and while we are at it.

SJW

08-04-2017 , 08:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by campfirewest
I thought the correct play was to use racist instead of idiot.
While yes, he would have scored more virtue points by signalling racism, he still gets on the board with his cosmopolitan condescension.
08-04-2017 , 10:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
More SJWism...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
OK... So... we should be able to fill in the following chart...
OSJer -o- SWJer
Opponents of Social Justice (OSJer)FoldnDark, JiggyMac 
<Neutral> (norms)Shame Trolly !!!1!Abbaddabba, aoFrantic, bahbahmickey, batair, BitchiBee, Black Peter, Bladesman87, BroadwaySushy, chezlaw, Deuces McKracken, DoOrDoNot, einbert, FlyWf, goofyballer, HastenDan, jalfrezi, Jbrochu, JiggsCasey, jjshabado, JohnyCrash, juan valdez, kioshk, kerowo, leavesofliberty, LordJvK, Love Sosa, Marn, Mat Sklansky, Max Cut, microbet, mongidig, Noodle Wazlib, Original Position, Paul D, pokerodox, Regret$, samsonh, SenorKeeed, superslug, sylar, Teh Jabber-Wookie, TheMadcap, The REAL Trolly, TiltedDonkey, ToothSayer, Trolly McTrollson, well named, whosnext, wil318466, Zeno, 13ball, 2OutsNoProb, 5ive, 57 On Red
Social Justice Warriors (SJWer)  
08-04-2017 , 10:11 PM
This thread is perhaps the greatest forum filtering method ever devised. There should be a button at the top that allows you to block every right wing moron using the term SJW in an serious context.
08-04-2017 , 10:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
Shame Trolly !!!1!
I don't know if we declare that you're neutral yet. We haven't gone back through your posts....

*Update - I did. I have no idea wtf you're talking about half the time.*

Last edited by JiggyMac; 08-04-2017 at 10:26 PM.
08-04-2017 , 10:22 PM
Why are we using OSJ? We already have the term "alt-right". There is zero need to buy in to their ridiculous SJW terminology in the slightest.
08-04-2017 , 10:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
I don't know if we declare that you're neutral yet. ..
I get to declare myself as neutral. This ain't your call to make.

Quote:
Originally Posted by uke_master
Why are we using OSJ? We already have the term "alt-right". There is zero need to buy in to their ridiculous SJW terminology in the slightest.
Because using "alt-right" is buying into their stupid terminology. Using the term "alt-right" allows these fools to no-true-scotch-guard their way out of interwebs jail... if they've never self-identified as "alt-right", that's their get-out-of-interwebs-jail-free card, right there.

OTOH, OSJers is defined by posting history, not self-identifications. Whine about SJWers... you are an OSJer. Just that simple.
08-04-2017 , 11:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
While yes, he would have scored more virtue points by signalling racism, he still gets on the board with his cosmopolitan condescension.
Jeezus, you hear this word from Miller and now it's part of your vocabulary?

You have used that word (in a quote) in one post before. You were talking about how Hitler hated (((cosmopolitans))).

Your view of cosmopolitans, Hitler's, and the Soviet's.



You guys really hate "cosmopolitans" don't you?
08-04-2017 , 11:07 PM
Altzis in slang, and white supremacists for formal style. ****ers. Sneks.
08-04-2017 , 11:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!

Because using "alt-right" is buying into their stupid terminology. Using the term "alt-right" allows these fools to no-true-scotch-guard their way out of interwebs jail... if they've never self-identified as "alt-right", that's their get-out-of-interwebs-jail-free card, right there.

OTOH, OSJers is defined by posting history, not self-identifications. Whine about SJWers... you are an OSJer. Just that simple.
So not only are you entirely buying into their terminology, you are letting them self identify. No. Their views are that of the alt-right. This is perfectly fine, well understood, standard term. We don't have to make up new terms just because they are going to whine about being called what they are.
08-04-2017 , 11:58 PM
Always nice to do my part to expose our Hitler youth counterparts on this board.
08-05-2017 , 12:09 AM
OSJ is probably a better term. It avoids the confusion with the left-right economic spectrum which must be very confusing for Trumpkins who have no idea from one day to the next whether they are isolationists or free traders or support health care for all or health care for none or American labor or automation and making your ties in China or hate cosmopolitan Wall Streeters or think the Dow Jones is what makes America Great. None of them are confused about hating anything about recognizing disadvantaged people and having any concern for that. None of them are confused about whether they want American culture to remain the same where people are white and Christian or at least they act like it outside their homes.
08-05-2017 , 12:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
Jeezus, you hear this word from Miller and now it's part of your vocabulary?

You have used that word (in a quote) in one post before. You were talking about how Hitler hated (((cosmopolitans))).

Your view of cosmopolitans, Hitler's, and the Soviet's.



You guys really hate "cosmopolitans" don't you?
No, I used bourgeois before - a name I prefer. Stephen Miller used cosmopolitan - figured it seemed topically relevant. Also, you do know he's Jewish, right? Are you an anti-Semite?
08-05-2017 , 12:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by uke_master
So not only are you entirely buying into their terminology, you are letting them self identify. No. Their views are that of the alt-right. This is perfectly fine, well understood, standard term. We don't have to make up new terms just because they are going to whine about being called what they are.
Considering you seem unaware of what is and is not alt-right, you don't seem qualified to make this determination.
08-05-2017 , 12:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
Always nice to do my part to expose our Hitler youth counterparts on this board.
I've got a book recommendation for you. Although I'm sure you're already familiar with its pages.

08-05-2017 , 12:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
OSJ is probably a better term. It avoids the confusion with the left-right economic spectrum which must be very confusing for Trumpkins who have no idea from one day to the next whether they are isolationists or free traders or support health care for all or health care for none or American labor or automation and making your ties in China or hate cosmopolitan Wall Streeters or think the Dow Jones is what makes America Great. None of them are confused about hating anything about recognizing disadvantaged people and having any concern for that. None of them are confused about whether they want American culture to remain the same where people are white and Christian or at least they act like it outside their homes.
The only one who seems awfully confused is you. Exhibit A ^^
08-05-2017 , 12:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by uke_master
So not only are you entirely buying into their terminology...
I'm not "buying into their terminology" at all. These fools are saying there's a set of IRL peeps that do some IRL thingees, that make the OSJers all bitter. They call this IRL set of peeps SJWers. I want to explore who exactly, among us Baja Politards, are in this IRL set of peeps.

All I'm doing is this... OSJers == {peeps who whine about alleged SJWers}. That's not buying into anything.

Quote:
... you are letting them self identify...
Again, no just no. I'm not "letting them self identify". I'm doing exactly the opposite. I'm eliminating self-identification completely from the situation.

Quote:
... We don't have to make up new terms just because they are going to whine about being called what they are.
Well. I'm sure who "we" are, unless you have a mouse in your pocket. My only interest is to sort this finite set of Baja Politards into three subsets: (a) those that whine about SJWers. I'm calling this set OSJers... which seems to be causing you some heartache. Call it something else, if that makes you more happy, I guess. (b) Neutrals like myself. And (c) the set of peeps who peeps who call others SJWers are referring to. Again, I called this subset "SJWers", but YMMV.

{set}my name of {set}your name of {set}
A=={peeps who call other peeps SJWers}OSJersAlt-Righters ??
B=={peeps that (peeps who call other peeps SJWers) are referring to}SJWers??
not-in (A union B)<Neutrals>??
08-05-2017 , 12:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
Always nice to do my part to expose our Hitler youth counterparts on this board.
Got one of you Shame. When you call your opponents Nazis, you're an SJW. Same goes for racist, bigot, homophobe....
08-05-2017 , 12:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
No, I used bourgeois before - a name I prefer. Stephen Miller used cosmopolitan - figured it seemed topically relevant. Also, you do know he's Jewish, right? Are you an anti-Semite?
You guys never never never give up on this line. But, Clarence Thomas is black, but what about that lady who campaigns against FGM - she's Muslim and she agrees with me.....

You just can't understand how dumb it is.

I understand he's half-Jewish and full idiot. There are idiotic Jews. There was even one who was a Trumpkin who used to post a lot here, but slunk off before politics unchained became an alt-right/OSJ forum.

      
m