Anyone that defends Islam from sweeping attacks is pro ISIS. Just like anyone who is critical of christainty in any way is anti Christian.

Lib my ass.

ISIS are a bunch of murderous *******s. **** them.

The question is why you, a smart liberal guy, need to keep lying about what liberals say and do? No one here has ever supported ISIS, but you pretend that we're pro-ISIS SJWs because we don't think all Muslims should be lumped in with ISIS.

What the **** are you talking about? Liberals criticize the negative aspects of Islam and Christianity. You are pissed because we don't agree with you that Islam is 100% evil and must be destroyed.

Let us try to count all the ways FoldnDark flat-out flippin' lies. The POS.

1. Well first, like all OSJers (Opponents of Social Justice), FoldnDark claims there exists a particular set of real live human beens who act in a certain identifiable manner. But like all OSJers ever, FoldnDark cannot come up with a coherent and non-question-begging description of this alleged set... to save his worthless excuse for a soul. Bottom line: FoldnDark is a lying liar who lies. Flat-out. The POS..
   
   
2. The reason 100% of OSJers cannot come up with a coherent description of this alleged subset of peeps they keep spazzing out over is this... because this whole thingee the OSJers carry on so about is a flat-out conspiracy theory... and one of the stupidest conspiracy theories at that. Like all fools pushing conspiracy theories, the whole house of cards falls when the OSJers are asked the simple question: "Who?". Bottom line: FoldnDark is a lying liar who lies. Flat-out. The POS..
   
   
3. Ditto with "What?". Bottom line: FoldnDark is a lying liar who lies. Flat-out. The POS..
   
   
4. Ditto with "Where?". Bottom line: FoldnDark is a lying liar who lies. Flat-out. The POS..
   
   
5. Ditto with "When?". Bottom line: FoldnDark is a lying liar who lies. Flat-out. The POS..
   
   
6. Ditto with "Why?". Bottom line: FoldnDark is a lying liar who lies. Flat-out. The POS..
   
   
7. Ditto with "How many?". Bottom line: FoldnDark is a lying liar who lies. Flat-out. The POS..
   
   
8. OK, let's take as given the existence of this alleged set of IRL peeps the OSJers are constantly spazzing out over. FoldnDark claims this set of IRL peeps "... would dismiss [the TQILA-IRFGS] as "house Arabs" or "race traitors"...". Well, this is, of course, another flat-out lie. Nobody has ever called the TQILA-IRFGS "House Arabs" o "Race Traitors". So this 'proves', if anything, that this alleged subset of human beens is the empty-set. Still another example of... the bottom line: FoldnDark is a lying liar who lies. Flat-out. The POS..
   
   
9. As anyone who isn't a fool, liar, or OSJer is well aware of... ISIS is predominantly of Arab ethnicity, and explicitly Islamic. The TQILA-IRFGS is predominantly of Kurdish ethnicity, and is predominantly Muslim. So what subset of IRL peeps who go around calling the TQILA-IRFGS "House Arabs" when a sizeable majority are not Arabs at all? What is the subset of IRL peeps who would go around calling the TQILA-IRFGS "Race Traitors" for fighting as a predominantly Kurd force -vs- a predominantly Arab force? Still another example of... the bottom line: FoldnDark is a lying liar who lies. Flat-out. The POS..

That was nine lies in just 24 words. Which is par for the course with this fool. Bottom line: FoldnDark is a lying liar who lies. Flat-out. The POS..

OK. This time well named has rounded up a few lists of the most active posters here in Baja. His four tables list 58 reg posters. Since we know OSJers exist here in Baja (we know this because the defining characteristic of OSJers is whining incessantly about these alleged SWJers). We know the OSJers claim these alleged SJWers exist here in Baja (again, we know this because the defining characteristic of OSJers is whining incessantly about these alleged SJWers).

So... we should be able to fill in the following chart...

Poster	OSJer	<neutral>	SJWer
Abbaddabba		?
aoFrantic		?
bahbahmickey		?
batair		?
BitchiBee		?
Black Peter		?
Bladesman87		?
BroadwaySushy		?
chezlaw		?
DoOrDoNot		?
Deuces McKracken		?
einbert		?
FoldnDark	X
FlyWf		?
goofyballer		?
HastenDan		?
jalfrezi		?
Jbrochu		?
JiggsCasey		?
JiggyMac		?
jjshabado		?
JohnyCrash		?
juan valdez		?
kioshk		?
kerowo		?
leavesofliberty		?
LordJvK		?
Love Sosa		?
Marn		?
Mat Sklansky		?
Max Cut		?
microbet		?
mongidig		?
Noodle Wazlib		?
Original Position		?
Paul D		?
pokerodox		?
Regret$		?
samsonh		?
SenorKeeed		?
Shame Trolly !!!1!		X
superslug		?
sylar		?
Teh Jabber-Wookie		?
TheMadcap		?
The REAL Trolly		?
TiltedDonkey		?
ToothSayer		?
Trolly McTrollson		?
well named		?
whosnext		?
wil318466		?
Zeno		?
13ball		?
2OutsNoProb		?
5ive		?
57 On Red		?

It may be helping you that I can't work out what you're talking about

Advocating for female sex slaves would get moded (by me at least)

All I can say for now is that if you are then please stop.

God damn you're a ****ing embarrassment.

SRS question tho: Basically you became a right winger because it's the only place people will find your weak and tragic bull**** to be funny and clever?

Well, I'm talking about those pesky SJWers... you know, the subject of the thread. I'm making two points here...

#1 Our resident Opponent to Social Justice (OSJer), FoldnDark, made a factual claim about the world. He claimed the set of IRL peeps, those who he feels are ironically referred to as SJWers, would be calling the fascist killing ******s in the pix above "House Arabs" y/o "Race Traitors".

Since this is a factual claim about the world, I'm calling BS, and asking our resident Opponent of Social Justice (OSJer), FoldnDark, for a cite.

This is why: we keep hearing about how in a "productive conversation", the good ideas will vanquish the bad ideas. However, if the stupid ideas can't ever be dismissed, neither the good or bad ideas will ever see the light of day. What we got here is a stupid idea, which is burying all the good, bad, and ugly ideas under it's ever growing pile of BS.

The OSJers are perpetually spewing this stupid conspiracy theory about these alleged SJWers. But when we ask the simplest of Qs... you know, like who, what, where. why & how... we get only gushers of still more incoherent spew.

Since this is all just stupid BS... these OSJer fools, can't cite crap. Theoretically, if enough peeps would ask these OSJer fools for enough cites, they'd give up with spamming this whole SJWer conspiracy theory. But you're the mod... you tell me... how does a spike get nailed through the heart of this whole SJWer gibberish ??

I mean when you're saying stuff like this

maybe if I had more idea wtf you're saying about female sex slaves then I would object. Hard to tell so far.

Seems like those of you who definitely aren't "SJWs" could just support Sarah Haider instead of getting so defensive.

How can folks tell if they're a SJWer -o- not? That's the question at hand.

Speaking of that however, I'm know I'm not a SJWer, so you're asking me to support a peep named S.Haider -vs- instead of being defensive about something unspecified? Does that even make a lick-o-sense? I've never even heard of this S.Haider peep. So I got nothing to possibly even be defensive about... but I ain't about to go about supporting some peep I've never even heard of.


Doesn't this all make about as much sense as saying: "Those who aren't Donkey Party fan-boys should support Circus Music, and not get defensive about being good at doing Math?"

Our resident Opponent of Social Justice (OSJer), FoldnDark, made another claim about the real world. He claimed the these alleged SJWers, right here in Baja Politardia, would start doing whatever it is they're alleged to do (this might be "shouting down", but that's not clear), if anyone dared to support ISIS. Since I personally do support ISIS I posted as such. The fact that it happened to be the sex slavery part of ISIS that I support isn't relevant. I could have just as well said I support the global Caliph that ISIS fights to establish. The point is I posted in support of ISIS.

Sp... let's see... so far zero SJWers have done whatever it is they do. So once again, looks like this is still another example of this SJWer conspiracy theory being full-o-crap.
.

"I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place." - Winston Churchill

BroadwaySushy is a gentleman and a scholar.

- Ignazio Silone

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gor

Only one of these quotes is genuine. Try to guess whether it's our harbinger of truth, BroadwaySushy's, or possible SJW Batair's. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised.

A grand jury sounds kinda like an event of justice which is social.

I don't know who that is. Maybe you could explain that instead of lying about liberals supporting ISIS.

It's obvious the only thing FoldN cares about is criticizing the left. These names he brings up are only props in that game.

"Hannah Arendt or else!!!!!?"

Before keyboard warriors, were there typewriter fighters?

I googled Haider. Apparently she's an ex-Muslim who runs a support group for apostates. All that really came up was the website for her organisation and a bunch of articles about the left betraying her.

Presumably this is one of those spots where Foldn, who definitely really is against "identity politics" points out that she's an ex-Muslim atheist who says she's a liberal and therefore we are honour bound to agree with her.

It's really incredible the level of bizzaro-projection these OSJer fools stoop to.

What our resident OSJers are constantly asking the Librulz to do is "Virtue Signal". Like, we just heard how the Librulz shouldn't get all defensive about this hot chica that nobody has ever heard of before (OK)... and instead, "Virtue Signal" their support for her because of her "Identity" (as a hot chica I guess).

LMFAO @OSJers !!!1!

Here's an excerpt from one of those "Betrayed by the Left" articles:

See? It always come back to "Islam is especially evil!" It's absolutely stupid to argue as Haider does, that terrorism is unconnected to imperialism. And to argue that Islam is especially evil for treating women and homosexuals badly while Christians did the same thing is incredibly dim-witted.

These *******s insist that we agree that Islam is super-evil and if we don't, we've "betrayed" them. That's idiotic.

And not only that. It's a pathetic way to try to overcome just terrible arguments. FoldN LOVES this tactic.

lol look at these idiots thinking Muslims have "special privileges" in the US. These people are no different from the rightwingers who think black people have "special privileges."

They are complaining about Muslims getting attorneys, FFS. Jesus.

That, and we always get back to that point where what is said is something like "You can't explain the rise of ISIS without the context of Western policy in the Middle East" and what gets heard is somehow "It's all 'Murrica's fault".