The SJW thread - Page 45 - Politics version 7.0 -- Two Plus Two Poker Forums

Two Plus Two Forums Archived Forums Other Topics Politics version 7.0

The SJW thread

...

Page 45 of 128

First

25 35 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 55 65 95

Last

Page 45 of 128

First

25 35 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 55 65 95

Last

02-15-2017 , 03:10 PM

#1101

LordJvK

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2015 Posts: 13,489

I find it rather insulting that you call my videos spam. There have been fruitful discussions to come from people watching them.

02-15-2017 , 03:18 PM

#1102

kerowo

lolcat

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 37,185

The content of the videos is immaterial.

02-15-2017 , 03:35 PM

#1103

57 On Red

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: May 2014 Posts: 4,901

Quote:

Originally Posted by LordJvK

I find it rather insulting that you call my videos spam. There have been fruitful discussions to come from people watching them.

The meaning of spam in this connection is as kerowo has explained to you.

02-15-2017 , 03:38 PM

#1104

LordJvK

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2015 Posts: 13,489

Well they are no longer being posted so well done.

02-15-2017 , 03:45 PM

#1105

kerowo

lolcat

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 37,185

Thanks, keeping spam off the site is one of the main jobs of mods.

02-15-2017 , 03:45 PM

#1106

Marn

veteran

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 2,092

Quote:

Originally Posted by 57 On Red

The meaning of spam in this connection is as kerowo has explained to you.

The meaning of SPAM you do not comprehend. Like you actually need to look it up in a dictionary.

Now if this thread had a triangle I would tell you to go **** ********

02-15-2017 , 04:20 PM

#1107

Trolly McTrollson

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 32,836

Quote:

Originally Posted by LordJvK

I find it rather insulting that you call my videos spam. There have been fruitful discussions to come from people watching them.

If you're making any money off of click ad revenue, then you're objectively posting spam and you should get permission from tptb.

02-15-2017 , 04:29 PM

#1108

Marn

veteran

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 2,092

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson

If you're making any money off of click ad revenue, then you're objectively posting spam and you should get permission from tptb.

well he is not, if you knew how Youtube works in that regard it would be obvious as soon as you noticed the amount of views he has on his videos. Hey SJW's stop acting like you want to shut him down for any other reason than that the videos offend your ingrained regressive ideology.

02-15-2017 , 04:31 PM

#1109

kerowo

lolcat

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 37,185

So if more people saw his videos he would make money? And so his posting links to it is in his own self interest, not 2+2s.

02-15-2017 , 04:35 PM

#1110

LordJvK

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2015 Posts: 13,489

I get the rules: you can post YouTube videos as long as they are not your own because that's spam.

I hope you guys are thrilled with what you've achieved. Hi-fives all round, another victory for social justice!

02-15-2017 , 04:37 PM

#1111

Marn

veteran

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 2,092

Quote:

Originally Posted by kerowo

So if more people saw his videos he would make money? And so his posting links to it is in his own self interest, not 2+2s.

No most people post Youtube videos for other reasons than monetary gain, like sharing ideas and sharing experiences. It is hard to get a youtube partnership, it takes thousands of views per video, you are really being cynical if you think that is his aim in posting videos on a subject so narrow and by chance relevant to this tiny forum is nefarious.

02-15-2017 , 04:38 PM

#1112

Trolly McTrollson

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 32,836

I mean, probably if you ask Matt for permission he'd be cool with it.

02-15-2017 , 04:41 PM

#1113

LordJvK

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2015 Posts: 13,489

Who is Matt? Maybe we could get a Supreme Court ruling on it.

02-15-2017 , 04:52 PM

#1114

StevenPoke

adept

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 1,141

Don't you need 10,000 subscribers to get partnered on YouTube?

02-15-2017 , 04:52 PM

#1115

chezlaw

Limey Bastard

Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 44,269

Quote:

Originally Posted by master3004

He's welcome to take it up with Mat. That's my last post on the subject.

Yours and everybody else's.

Final warning to all to report any concerns or take them to a moderating thread. Do not bring it up in content threads

02-15-2017 , 04:52 PM

#1116

kerowo

lolcat

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 37,185

Open a thread about it in About The Forum, that's the quickest way to get a response.

02-15-2017 , 04:55 PM

#1117

Trolly McTrollson

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 32,836

I would just pm Mason about it.

02-15-2017 , 04:55 PM

#1118

chezlaw

Limey Bastard

Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 44,269

Quote:

Originally Posted by LordJvK

To be clear on the rules on your your you-tube videos.

You cannot link to them externally in any way. You can embed them providing it's sparingly and they are on topic. You remain responsible for the content.

Don't abuse it or I will take the simple option of banning them.

02-15-2017 , 04:59 PM

#1119

chezlaw

Limey Bastard

Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 44,269

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marn

Now if this thread had a triangle I would tell you to go **** ********

Not in content threads please. The disclaimer makes no difference.

02-15-2017 , 04:59 PM

#1120

57 On Red

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: May 2014 Posts: 4,901

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marn

The meaning of SPAM you do not comprehend. Like you actually need to look it up in a dictionary.

No, it's you who doesn't comprehend, quelle surprise. Posting links to YouTube videos from which you derive advertising revenue is spamming the board.

Quote:

Now if this thread had a triangle I would tell you to go **** ********

But it doesn't, does it? And annoying one of Sweden's notorious neo-Nazis is not something I am ever likely to feel bad about.

02-15-2017 , 05:06 PM

#1121

Marn

veteran

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 2,092

I am just laughing at 57 on grey's post. But I have to ask, is it ok to call someone a notorious neo-nazi in a non triangle thread with absolutely nothing to back it up?

02-15-2017 , 05:08 PM

#1122

chezlaw

Limey Bastard

Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 44,269

Quote:

Originally Posted by LordJvK

Here's a great example of anti-intellectual SJW tactics in action:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/41...rty-r-1653798/

Here, a poster called AC Slater makes a claim about the biggest shift in poliics we've seen in our lifetimes. It's a fairly innocuous post:

Now this isn't a terrible point, it's actually what most commentators have been saying.

How was this received?

Immediate mockery.

This shuts down discussion, it doesn't open it up. It just mocks the guy's point.

....<sniped>

24 hour timeout LordJvK. You've already had you're final warning not to bring posters or the forum into this this thread. Do not post in this thread for 24 hours please.

Everyone else who's been ignoring the rules - do not expect any more warnings in this thread

02-15-2017 , 05:32 PM

#1123

spanktehbadwookie

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 19,374

Can we get back to trump loving college board members banning panel speakers ( for their political opinions) that were selected by a student vote?

Is Ana Kasparian's experience just an isolated incident?

Are those conservative board members now deem-able as 'SJWs'?

02-15-2017 , 08:36 PM

#1124

5ive

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 6,750

Quote:

Originally Posted by kerowo

So if more people saw his videos he would make money? And so his posting links to it is in his own self interest, not 2+2s.

O SNAP EDIT... chezz gonna get ya if you grunch too hard

02-15-2017 , 08:47 PM

#1125

FoldnDark

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 11,931

Quote:

Originally Posted by Original Position

Do you think it is illiberal for a church to require its pastor to assent to their statement of faith?

If not, then what is wrong with an avowedly religious college requiring its faculty to also sign a statement of faith? They aren't coercing anyone to sign it. You aren't religious and don't care for their beliefs. Fine, go to a different school then.

It is coherent to believe that procedural liberalism should guide government, but Christian morality and theology should guide private life and education. If someone wants to run a university on that basis, they do not need to give up the belief that government in diverse societies like ours is best run with rules guaranteeing freedom of religion, press, speech, assembly, etc. They are not setting up a government.

I'm not sure we if we really disagree here. It's perfectly fine if you want to join a religion, or a religious school, where you celebrate beliefs based on faith, not empiricism, and choose to succumb to authoritarianism rather than individual freedom. That's just not liberal.

Find me a church that bases it's beliefs on falsifiable research instead of revelation, and I'll show you a liberal religion.

Page 45 of 128

First

25 35 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 55 65 95

Last

...

Page 45 of 128

First

25 35 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 55 65 95

Last