Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The SJW thread The SJW thread

02-03-2017 , 06:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
No, I made the comment that she was pepper sprayed for wearing a red hat. The sprayer assumed she was a supporter, but he was only right by accident. She could have very well been on his "side", and simply standing up for free speech. And of course, he was wrong to attack her for it either way. This is what happens in here every day.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Exactly. Whether she was a Trump supporter or not is irrelevant. It was assault.

The person that did it should be charged.
Sure.

So why is Foldn making this weird claim about spraying people with red hats? That is a possibility, but more likely whoever sprayed her knew that she was a Trump supporter because of things that she said or did. How does he know the pepper sprayer assumed anything? It's such a bizarre argument to make.
02-03-2017 , 06:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
This is why the term SJW and this thread exist.
So SJWs point out your dumb assumptions? Okay.
02-03-2017 , 07:00 PM
It's dumb to assume someone who would attend a protest on Milo and then proceed to pepper spray someone on camera would also be doing their due diligence to be sure said person is actually a Trump supporter.

Pretty sure, like in the Milo thread, those people who advocate violence against fascism are also the same people who think anyone remotely associated with what they believe is fascism is fascist (Trump supporter, red hat, disagrees with them, drinks Pepsi), and also deserves violence.
02-03-2017 , 07:03 PM
Foldn, did you bother watching the video? She was in the process of being interviewed about her support for trump. Why are you acting like we can't know what happened when there is video evidence?

Foldn, let's see one citation of people advocating violence against Milo anywhere on this forum. Let's see one instance of anything you claim. Because you're full of ****
02-03-2017 , 07:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
Foldn, did you bother watching the video? She was in the process of being interviewed about her support for trump. Why are you acting like we can't know what happened when there is video evidence?
You all keep missing the point in your blind support of violence against fascism.... how much more do I need to spell this out?
02-03-2017 , 07:06 PM
Where did I say the violence was OK? Again, I conversed with Dan in the other thread saying she didn't deserve it! Those posts are up, and exist for you to be read rather than to misrepresent my position. I'd like it if you followed along and did a bit of due diligence.
02-03-2017 , 07:09 PM
Slippery slope, anybody?

Now where did I hear that mentioned before.
02-03-2017 , 07:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GBV
By forcing a discussion about definitions and ideas concerning the term you are legimtizing it. What next, are you going to force a discussion about yelling the word "******" at black people?

Of course, most people are not going to go along with your legimitization of the word. It is not generally in use by intelligent adults over 25. who are not sympathetic to the far right.
The meaning, if any, of SJW is a legitimate topic. There's no PC issue so it's allowed.

No-one is being forced to discuss it.
02-03-2017 , 07:13 PM
I'm actually under armed guard right now. Send help. TIA
02-03-2017 , 07:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Chez, I understood that these sort of abusive personal attacks are not allowed in content threads.

Is that correct?
Chez.

You didn't answer this question for me.

Edit: I see you did below. Thanks.
02-03-2017 , 07:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GBV
By forcing a discussion about definitions and ideas concerning the term you are legimtizing it. What next, are you going to force a discussion about yelling the word "******" at black people?

Of course, most people are not going to go along with your legimitization of the word. It is not generally in use by intelligent adults over 25. who are not sympathetic to the far right.
I can name at least ten very well known academics who are obviously not of the far right who have used this term.

So please get your facts right before making posts like this.
02-03-2017 , 07:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive
See this is the problem with the dishonesty, it leads to people like this drooling ****ing idiot to start regurgitating it:
24 hour timeout 5ive. It's for that post as well as some of thr other about dishonesty.

That means no posting in this thread or in any other content thread on this topic for 1 day.
02-03-2017 , 07:15 PM
Technically I think it is a fact to say that individuals who protect the community have existed longer than they have been recorded by other individuals who protect community knowledge.
02-03-2017 , 07:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
Where did I say the violence was OK? Again, I conversed with Dan in the other thread saying she didn't deserve it! Those posts are up, and exist for you to be read rather than to misrepresent my position. I'd like it if you followed along and did a bit of due diligence.
Apologies... I'll put down my pepper spray.
02-03-2017 , 07:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
Foldn, let's see one citation of people advocating violence against Milo anywhere on this forum. Let's see one instance of anything you claim. Because you're full of ****
Final warning aoFrantic.
02-03-2017 , 07:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
Final warning aoFrantic.
LOOOOOOOOL
02-03-2017 , 07:41 PM
It's most unfortunate that Chez keeps breaking up conversations, but he is fervently trying to keep threads on topic... anyhow, the whole violence against fascist convo has been going on for the past week or so and has spilled over into many threads. Plenty of people have advocated violence against fascists.... plenty of people have called Milo, Trump, their supporters fascists.... plenty of violent protests have now happened at Milo events.... pepper spray.... bloody noses..... fires..... one of the innocent protesters ended up getting shot.... I'm not sure why I need to keep connecting all these dots.......
02-03-2017 , 07:46 PM
I nominate Chase Iron Eyes as an outstanding actually living warrior for justice which is social. Look him up.
02-03-2017 , 07:52 PM
Can you give any specific examples foldn?
02-03-2017 , 07:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
It's most unfortunate that Chez keeps breaking up conversations, but he is fervently trying to keep threads on topic... anyhow, the whole violence against fascist convo has been going on for the past week or so and has spilled over into many threads. Plenty of people have advocated violence against fascists.... plenty of people have called Milo, Trump, their supporters fascists.... plenty of violent protests have now happened at Milo events.... pepper spray.... bloody noses..... fires..... one of the innocent protesters ended up getting shot.... I'm not sure why I need to keep connecting all these dots.......
Your arguments are those of a dolt. No one said pepper spraying trump supporters was a good idea or advocated it. Not so much as Trump advocated violence against protestors at his rallies.

A nazi got punched. People said, "yeah, go ahead and punch a nazi, but if someone gets caught they should get punished and don't punch anyone who isn't a nazi." The white supremacists were the ones trying to broaden the awesome slogan "punch a nazi!" into more general categories which were continually protested by the pro punch a nazi folks. Any attempt to link punching a nazi to pepper spraying a Trump supporter is ridiculous.
02-03-2017 , 08:01 PM
Meh, I think I've made a pretty solid case. And that attitude is going to get someone killed.

FWIW, I'll scrap with any one of yall. Name the time and place. Time and place are key... like not in the middle of an angry mob. Also there will be rules. No touching the face and hair. That is all.
02-03-2017 , 08:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
Can you give any specific examples foldn?
Jesus, he just did.
02-03-2017 , 08:03 PM
So foldn in trying to avoid that fact that he is putting words in the mouths of people pro nazi punching is trying to distract us by threatening to beat us up. Classy.
02-03-2017 , 08:04 PM
Stay classy San Deigo, and thanks for stopping by!
02-03-2017 , 08:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordJvK
All they do is:

1. Label
2. Shout down
3. Ban

Those are the only moves in the SJW trick box.
Labeling and ignoring is super easy, it absolves one from using their brain. Trying to actually argue with facts is a lot harder than just going "my feelings make facts" -mode.

      
m