Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The SJW thread The SJW thread

08-12-2017 , 07:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6ix
wat am i reading


Read it like a haughty plantation owner is saying it. Ex-plantation owner to be precise....selling magical beans.
08-12-2017 , 07:20 PM
08-12-2017 , 07:23 PM
http://existentialcomics.com/comic/101

Or if we're feeling highbrow.
08-12-2017 , 07:40 PM
I thought these dudes learned to just go to their white supremacist rallies and carry their tiki torches and not bother trying to argue on the internet anymore.



Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
...

someone getting their feelings hurt because of a racist store owner would not qualify, for me.
08-12-2017 , 07:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladesman87
http://existentialcomics.com/comic/101

Or if we're feeling highbrow.
too stronk
08-12-2017 , 07:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
Jesus ****ing christ you're an ACist.

Why didn't you say so in the first place? I wouldn't have ****ing bothered.
I'm deducting 5 internets from you for not seeing it sooner.
08-12-2017 , 07:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
...

now in todays political climate being slightly right of center is just as good as being hitler.
Wait what's wrong with Hitler? Can't a guy just exercise his freedom?
08-12-2017 , 08:00 PM
FWIW if my mom had tried to abort me during the 3rd trimester, then the 9th, then the 21st, then the 87th, then the 123rd, I might have a chip on my shoulder as well.


Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
because if men could have babies i would be against men aborting them also. not my fault nature or god designated women.

definitely not going to debate abortion with a group of dishonest people but i will give you my thoughts in one single post, never to be addressed again.

i'm not the boss of women. but women aren't the boss of fetuses. i think that 1-celled fetuses are people (you and I were a single cell for a bit) and therefore should be allowed to be born.

seriously, save the part where you say that a fetus is part of the woman's body (it isn't), the part where i want to control women or their reproduction (i don't), the part where women should get to make health choices (killing their child is not a health choice), save the part where you bring up the mom who has cancer and must abort her baby to save her own life. save all of your ******ed arguments because little babies shouldn't get killed when they could be born and put into foster care instead.

i would like to increase funding and support for foster care (including full legalization of gay adoption) in order to take care of these children. this would have to go hand in hand with subsidies for birth control pills and condoms. there would also have to be an increase in personal responsibility and the acceptance that sex isn't entirely risk free and that creating people is a side effect.
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
don't care about the womb, care about what's inside it.

ok, that was seriously my last post on abortion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
no, i'm not worried about that, but there are very few republicans who i would vote for in the first place. maybe like 2 or 3 that are serving now. and neither of them want to "round people up and transport them." i don't identify with that ideology so try not to be so insulting. what else shall you randomly accuse me of?

the only ideology that i identify with is to examine every issue on a case by case basis.
08-12-2017 , 08:12 PM
I have this dude on ignore and he's still spamming. Jesus Christ can someone do something about this?
08-12-2017 , 08:15 PM
His posts are for more varied then yours. Maybe find another safe space?
08-12-2017 , 08:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
I'm in favour of positive discrimination. Call it racist and sexist if you like.

It's not 'completely justified', it's not even a good thing. It's sadly, and really quite outrageously, still a necessary thing.
Didn't Churchill coin the phrase (and this isn't a joke about all the false Churchill quotes) about, "Of course _____ is a dumb idea, but it's far the best idea of all the dumb ideas we have left," or some variation thereof?

That's the thing these racist dudes don't get when they say, "Affirmative action is dumb," or, "Reparations are dumb."

Like, OF COURSE THEY'RE DUMB! We should've never let it get to the point where all we have left are dumb ideas.
08-12-2017 , 08:36 PM
Lol b***h-ass wil crying.
08-12-2017 , 08:55 PM
I deduct 5 internets from myself for not guessing that Martin Luther The King quotes were incoming.


Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
This quote by MLK sums up my opinion on race perfectly.

The left is so far gone that MLK Jr. is now a racist.
08-12-2017 , 08:56 PM
chez why does the word ****** trigger you
08-12-2017 , 09:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
I have this dude on ignore and he's still spamming. Jesus Christ can someone do something about this?
Quote:
Originally Posted by batair
His posts are for more varied then yours. Maybe find another safe space?
I'm now imagining if wil ever posts when his daughter is watching, and she asks him, "Daddy, why is it not showing that one guy's things?" To which wil replies, "Well you see my child, that guy pwns and triggers Daddy too much, so Daddy likes to play pretend and act like he doesn't exist, even though he has the third most things on the forum. That's what you do when you when you feel overmatched and overwhelmed, you pretend like it's not real and then just call yourself a winner. Now go play."

This is both hilarious and sad.
08-12-2017 , 09:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iron Tamer
chez why does the word ****** trigger you
Trigger? Not sure what that means. The reason some insults aren't allowed (or are being discouraged) is because it's objectionable in respect of those with real disabilities.

6ix - I've deleted your post - you know better. You can repost the point without that insult if you want to.
08-12-2017 , 09:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
You're so weak with your appeals to "most people"

"You people" is exactly your level.
Should I quote all the times he's said he's an independent thinker and doesn't let Other People dictate his views, or is that bit too kiddie-game-down-the-street?

I vote kiddie-game because I'm too lazy right now.
08-12-2017 , 09:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
Trigger? Not sure what that means. The reason some insults aren't allowed (or are being discouraged) is because it's objectionable in respect of those with real disabilities.

6ix - I've deleted your post - you know better. You can repost the point without that insult if you want to.
shouldn't you petition for it to be censored?

The general way taboo words seem to be handled on 2p2 is they are censored and you get warned/banned from evading censors. like saying f u ck instead of ****.

seems very awkward for certain words to be not censored while being in a zone of avoidance like ******
08-12-2017 , 09:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
Tell me more about how most people disagree with me?

If I wasn't hated by racists I would feel bad about myself.

Crack the pizzagate code since we last chatted?
They're not even thinking on that level.
08-12-2017 , 09:25 PM
Ahaha Iron Lamer is trying to suicide himself rather than face the incoming humbling.
08-12-2017 , 09:27 PM
humbling? all your humbling has amounted to is the entire forum seeing you are an idiot and a pussy.

I offered concrete offers you give million word answers while wimpering in fear.
08-12-2017 , 09:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iron Tamer
humbling? all your humbling has amounted to is the entire forum seeing you are an idiot and a pussy.

I offered concrete offers you give million word answers while wimpering in fear.
Ironically, I offered to bet on EVEN THAT, among 350 other things.

Srsly, are you mentally handicapped on a clinical level? I don't even think you're trolling, rather that your reading comprehension level is barely above literate. Which, uh, weirdly enough is the thing we're supposed to be betting on...

I wanted to say that would stop me from this humbling, butnahhh. I just won't feel as good about it.
08-12-2017 , 10:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
i don't want anyone to be arrested for drugs. next?
This is an irrelevant dodge.
08-12-2017 , 11:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6ix
Ironically, I offered to bet on EVEN THAT, among 350 other things.

Srsly, are you mentally handicapped on a clinical level? I don't even think you're trolling, rather that your reading comprehension level is barely above literate. Which, uh, weirdly enough is the thing we're supposed to be betting on...

I wanted to say that would stop me from this humbling, butnahhh. I just won't feel as good about it.
tell me your counter offer in plain english

instead of writing paragraphs of gibberish that nobody reads.
08-12-2017 , 11:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
This is an irrelevant dodge.
i agree with you that drug laws are unfairly applied to black people. it doesn't demonstrate systemic racism from the justice system.

i think there are reasonable explanations for why the drug laws are unfairly applied to black people that don't include race.

one explanation is that they're more often applied to poor people in general, white or black. more of them get swept up as poor areas are policed more often due to high crime. poor people get pulled over more often for busted up car/expired registration and then get caught with weed in the car. much larger number of these poor people happen to be black.

another explanation is that cops often pursue harsh sentences against drug offenders with gang associations. example, they catch a guy with a clean record but based on the crew he's hanging around with they get the vibe that he's not a great guy. they choose to arrest him and pursue a harsh sentence, thinking he will probably be involved with something worse down the road. this could be true whether the offender is white or black.

both of these scenarios describe the same action and aren't motivated by race.

      
m