try to follow along. before this interaction i already agreed that this was an act of terrorism
my response to a point and a question
wow what a radical statement i just made lol. antifa and white supremacists showed up to the same spot and started brawling. violence erupted as police sat back. thats what happened. are innocent people going to get hurt during a riot? yes, of course. thats kind of part of the answer to the question of what happens when police sit back and watch violence escalate

look at all the strawmem showing up. i failed to denounce the white supremacists? weird because im pretty sure i just finished agreeing it was a white supremacist act of terror. you're really doing wonders to disprove my claim that a dominant theme in the SJW community is bitterness and resentment. youre just dying to fabricate someone to hate. you repeatedly have to fabricate a pov that was clearly disproved just a few posts prior

Oh, wil made a point about culture? I have a source that disputes that:



Maybe take a little less meth between posts so you can keep your thoughts straight.

What that ****ing idiot did with his car is horrific. He plowed into a group of human beings knowing full well he could easily kill someone, which is exactly what wound up happening.

What is the issue you have with my position? I've said this from the very beginning. Jesus Christ, this is exactly the same issue when that idiot pulled out a rifle and shot 5 cops in Dallas. Does he represent all black people? No. Does he represent all Black lives matter? No. Do I consider Black Lives matter a racist organization? YES.

This is the exact same situation except you are changing the skin color of the people involved. Nazis are scum. Racists are scum. I simply am honest enough to dish it out on both sides.

settle down stupid. antifa openly support communism. we have 100's of millions of bodies piled up from that cute little philosophy. both sides are radical in ideology. both side have been violent recently. both sides are a genocidal disaster. yes there were innocent people in attendance but the violence escalated between two radical groups

The Nazi/white supremacist ideology is either "kill all minorities" or "send them all home."

The BLM ideology is "Punish white cops who kill black people."

Not the same.

wil,

In 1942 if an American citizen of Japanese descent protesting internment said "Japanese Lives Matter" would that be racist?

so wil saying different parenting isn't about culture? me saying wil was talking culture is wrong? you trying to snip out nonsense to justify your stupidity is just another example of why people just end up ignoring you

you have endless energy for pissy and idiotic arguments. what you don't have time for is actual evidence to back up your claim that people actually accurately described the google memo and criticized it

No denouncing of the evil ****s who commited the acts, only "It possibly could have been avoided" (by not having those pesky protesters there)

Congrats! You're a winner on "Are they as awful as the President?"!

Baby steps!

Of course it was an evil act. That's not in dispute.

BLM is a bit racist. not like nazi racist, but still racist

You said THE EXACT OPPOSITE:

What the hell is wrong with you?

and accurately described the contents?

i bet you 5 cents you cant dig up a quote where you accurately describe the contents of the google memo and criticize it

ducking this quote 10 times and keep bringing it up is certainly much easier than just quoting yourself right?

so after wil describes culture, i refer to what wil described (culture) and two other possibilities, we agree wil was describing culture, i told you i was describing wil stating culture, you keep repeating a quote where you think i am contradicting myself? i mean i see the quote. i wrote it. this is my point. you will endlessly peck away at ridiculously stupid and obvious nonsense and yet youre too busy to dig up your supposed quote about the google memo

who didnt denounce (condemn)? who? im serious. youre a mod. strawmanning dishonest bull**** is expected of the mentally challenged SJW's but its definitely not appropriate for a mod to be a snarky and dishonest dickhead slandering posters. im seriously sick of your slandering

who didnt condemn?

I still don't understand what's going on. Why would you say wil's post was not about culture if you thought it was? And then why would you blame me for the confusion? This is totally bizarre.

antifa are actually slightly worse than the nazi protesters, in my opinion.

the nazi protesters had a nice aesthetic with the torches. antifa are a band of masked thugs who are generally ugly and who hide behind a bunch of women, jump out to hit people with sticks, and then go back behind the protection of women.

How is a hashtag about police reform racist?

Still can't bear to say it. I said the little ****er who commited the act was evil, you said it was an evil act. There is a loud and clear distinction between the two because you don't have the ability to say "Nazi scumbags are all super evils ****s."

Go ahead, try it.

How can anti-fascism strategy do anything?

Except even if you personally think they are racist, you know damn well there are good reasons for good people to support BLM, namely that cops literally get away with murder and the burden disproportionately falls on black people. Yeah, I heard your spiel about how police brutality is for the greater good of blacks, but you know damn well reasonable people can think you are full of ****.

On the other hand, Nazis are pure unadulterated, evil. There is nothing good about them. Some of the worst the world has ever seen. So evil that the United States of America allied with actual in the flesh COMMUNISTS to destroy them.

My problem with you is that you regularly minimize the evil of Nazism by trying to equate it with whatever "leftist" happens to be pissing you off that day.

So who judges the accuracy? You? Hey, I'll stipulate that my critique of the Google memo will not be deemed accurate by weird rightwingers such as yourself.

Was that it? You made a bunch of posts whining that no one had made a post about the Google memo that you would agree with? That's what you've been whining about this whole time? Demanding links so you could say "But I disagree with this post, and my mere disagreement proves me right"? Do you understand how moronic that is? If so, try not to do it again.

i said wils post was about culture. thats obvious. the fact you think i said otherwise is also obvious. i pointed out multiple times thats not the case and yet you cant move on

yes. obviously

all i saw were broad generalizations. nobody actually quoted contents of the memo, describe the accurately, and then criticized them. the fact you could go on and on endlessly bickering about this instead of just posting a quote, says all that needs to be said. you can't and wont post a quote of yourself that you claim exists for a reason. you'd rather lie and argue endlessly

post it or don't. im done entertaining your insatiable appetite for pointless bickering

I know you said otherwise. It's right there:

WTF is going on?