and the solution that's offered is apply the things, intentionally, but in reverse. i want to stop a crime so i'll perpetrate it in reverse. seems moral.

Jesus Christ can you really be this obtuse?

I want Natalie Portman to be my girlfriend but that doesnt make it so.

Every single study ever done in every social science clearly and without debate establishes that racism exists and is part of EVERY SINGLE PERSONS thinking.

I want to live in a world where race doesn't matter but that is not this one.

The difference between you and I is I'm intellectually honest enough to understand the real world and to accept that I'm part of the group benefitting from this fact of human nature. You call all the evidence fake news because it props up the system and you don't care at all how it effects people not like you.

Much more moral to prop up the system because it benefits you personally.

I'll just leave this here

I think that the black community rightly is wary of white people in power because they apparently know more about history than you do. Nowhere did I state that they could "only be policed by people who look like them." You either are making stuff because you are badly losing this argument or you are not following the argument in the first place.

No you don't. You were just trying to make the argument that racial jury selection is okay if it means a killer is more likely to go to jail.

Of course there are objective criteria. The ability to successfully interact with the local community is an objective factor.


This is an obvious lie and a pathetic attempt to distract from your many contradictory arguments.

So are you blind, deaf, or do you just not follow the news? Because these people actually did, proudly, come out to the streets yesterday, and then murdered a woman. You think they will proudly march with their racist slogans, Hitler quotes, and fiery torches but they WOULDN'T eat at a "No Blacks" sandwich shop?

You're either lying, or immensely deaf to the current situation of our country.

I would want the prosecution to prove their case so that ANY jury would convict the man if he was guilty.

If you're a black man in a black City with a black police force and a black City council with a black mayor you're probably in the dangerous place a black person could be in America.

But, you know, they "connect". If there was any merit at all that it worked we could at least have a discussion but the results seem to be the reverse. It gets WORSE.

1) racism is bad
2) figure out who was racist in the past
3) be racist against them
4) racism is good

leftist guide to morality and race

Not possible. Hasn't it been established that racist people are lower iq and under educated? How is it possible that dumb uneducated people run the system?

Only highly educated people understand the nuance of systemic racism. The highest educated are the politicians.

Let's put the dishwashers in charge. Switch it up.

it is true you have to be highly educated to believe in falsities like systemic racism and white guilt

Guile. They don't have to be "uneducated". They can have ignored education for alternative information.

You sound like an "identity-politics" style white supremacist.

Idiot liberals with their idiot ideas. How many insitutions do they wreck? The education system is lolololtastic because of their idiocy.

Everything they touch is aids.

Here comes the master aids spreader.

Morning, spank.

Lame.

You are not racist at all.

That's you.

Have you taken responsibility for acting like a bigot yet? Did you show it?

Well reasoned and argued. You are a scholar sir.

Look it up. Feel free to report back with the safest cities for blacks and please break down their leadership and police force by race. I bet you'd be surprised.

And you are most definitely not. You are a typical leftist "thinker" that uses social bull**** "data" when your back is to the wall when asked for explain something. You use real data in a dishonest way, using the parts that help you and throw out the rest. When confronted you use words like "systemic", a word that means nothing in these discussions.

Everything about your arguments reek of intellectual dishonesty and simply pushing your agenda. If you had real arguments people here would be more than welcome to listen to them. You don't.

I can only pray the judicial branch in this country has the sense to limit the idiocy you people will bring upon us.

Your assumptions are apparently wrong:

http://www.npr.org/sections/codeswit...olice-violence


But it did also show that adding black officers could increase fatal encounters:

Who said they ran the system? I'm sure there are some in leadership positions. I would guess that the smart racists may want to go into government so that they can live out their dreams.

You do have to be literate to read the studies. You are probably too busy watching the woman from yesterday get killed over and over, but if you get a break, you should do a little research.

Lol at this nonsense bull**** "study". Yeah, we are well aware black officers are more likely to shoot a black suspect. They don't have the scrutiny that white officers do so they actually react the way they feel they need to more often. Your eyes puts police officers lives in danger solely due to their skin color. Who's the racist?

Lol at you and this bull****.