Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The SJW thread The SJW thread

08-12-2017 , 12:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
Nobody called you Hitler. I called you an idiot because you have a tissue thin political view that is almost entirely based on protecting the rights of the worst of humanity.
"tissue thin political view" is a great way to put it. the federal government should be tissue thin (with a bad ass army).

it's entirely based on protecting the rights of all of humanity, which includes the worst of it, yes. then it's up to individual interactions on the local level to maintain civility.

you seem to think the government needs to point a gun at people to make them act right. i'd just let them act right on their own.
08-12-2017 , 12:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
oh ok, back on ignore, troll
Sure thing fool.

Well, I think we really should move on from this worthless troll augie_, and get this thread back on topic. Let's go back to square one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LordJvK
Does not surprise me in the slightest that this sort of thing would happen under an SJWs watch because SJWs have zero interest in questioning a single one of their own beliefs.

All they do is:

1. Label
2. Shout down
3. Ban

Those are the only moves in the SJW trick box.

They are as illiberal and as totalitarian as any Nazi or communist. I blame them entirely for the current state of things. By being so incredibly partisan and so incredibly bullying in their tactics, they have given rise to the far right across the world. They deserve what they are getting right now.
This is our OP. What have we learned in the last 100k posts regarding these pesky & mysterious SJWers? Well, I think our resident expert on Freeze Peach Rites on Cumpuss, FoldnDark, best summed it up here...

Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
No, as I told OP, it appears the college kids are just a symptom of the greater problem. Or rather, they're the most obvious manifestations, along with gobs of social media warriors. But this close-minded reactionary orthodoxy setting in on the left has much more far-reaching roots. See college professors described by Haidt and DeBoer. See the push back at Google posted in the free speech thread.

I won't go through your list one by one, but many if not all of them I would be more likely to categorize as legit SJWs not "SJWs". They actually fought for a cause sincerely.

An "SJW" would be more likely to reference those people's thoughts and actions when convenient, but when confronted with their words like "judged by the content of their character, rather than the color of their skin," resort to some form of personal attack to obfuscate how they just used concepts like whitesplaining to do the exact opposite. Soon enough MLK will be tossed under the bus, watch. To wit, I would consider Abe Lincoln to be a real SJW, but I noticed on my Facebook feed recently even he's being tossed to the wolves as an incorrigible racist.
For reference, this is <snip> of the Wikipedia article that several OSJers have quoted y/o linkeed...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
"Social justice warrior" (commonly abbreviated SJW) is a pejorative term for an individual promoting socially progressive views, including feminism, civil rights, multiculturalism, and identity politics. The accusation of being an SJW carries implications of pursuing personal validation rather than any deep-seated conviction, and being engaged in disingenuous social justice arguments or activism to raise personal reputation, also known as virtue signalling.

The phrase originated in the late 20th century as a neutral or positive term for people engaged in social justice activism. In 2011, when the term first appeared on Twitter, it changed from a primarily positive term to an overwhelmingly negative one. During the Gamergate controversy, the negative connotation gained increased use, and was particularly aimed at those espousing views adhering to social liberalism, cultural inclusiveness, or feminism, as well as views deemed to be politically correct.

The term has entered popular culture, including a parody role-playing video game released in 2014 titled Social Justice Warriors...
08-12-2017 , 12:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Brag all you want, but you are not the boss of women or fetus.

How can you object to people you imagine describing you as sexist when illegal abortion exclusively targets women?
because if men could have babies i would be against men aborting them also. not my fault nature or god designated women.

definitely not going to debate abortion with a group of dishonest people but i will give you my thoughts in one single post, never to be addressed again.

i'm not the boss of women. but women aren't the boss of fetuses. i think that 1-celled fetuses are people (you and I were a single cell for a bit) and therefore should be allowed to be born.

seriously, save the part where you say that a fetus is part of the woman's body (it isn't), the part where i want to control women or their reproduction (i don't), the part where women should get to make health choices (killing their child is not a health choice), save the part where you bring up the mom who has cancer and must abort her baby to save her own life. save all of your ******ed arguments because little babies shouldn't get killed when they could be born and put into foster care instead.

i would like to increase funding and support for foster care (including full legalization of gay adoption) in order to take care of these children. this would have to go hand in hand with subsidies for birth control pills and condoms. there would also have to be an increase in personal responsibility and the acceptance that sex isn't entirely risk free and that creating people is a side effect.
08-12-2017 , 12:49 PM
Why aren't you worried about Republicans rounding up people and transporting them to a different country? It seems like anyone who really cared for freedom wouldn't identify with an ideology that wishes to forcibly move people across borders.

And that aspect of the right wing in America has gotten worse.
08-12-2017 , 12:52 PM
Quote:
seriously, save the part where you say that a fetus is part of the woman's body (it isn't)
Sure, but the womb is, right?
08-12-2017 , 12:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
Sure, but the womb is, right?
don't care about the womb, care about what's inside it.

ok, that was seriously my last post on abortion.
08-12-2017 , 12:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
Why aren't you worried about Republicans rounding up people and transporting them to a different country? It seems like anyone who really cared for freedom wouldn't identify with an ideology that wishes to forcibly move people across borders.

And that aspect of the right wing in America has gotten worse.
no, i'm not worried about that, but there are very few republicans who i would vote for in the first place. maybe like 2 or 3 that are serving now. and neither of them want to "round people up and transport them." i don't identify with that ideology so try not to be so insulting. what else shall you randomly accuse me of?

the only ideology that i identify with is to examine every issue on a case by case basis.
08-12-2017 , 12:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
because.....

not my fault...

....definitely not going to debate abortion with...

i'm not the boss of women. but women ...

....save all of your ******ed argument .


Oh? So you are not going to debate women when making laws exclusively about them?

Go ahead, brag some more...
08-12-2017 , 01:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Oh? So you are not going to debate women when making laws exclusively about them?

Go ahead, brag some more...
i'm not going to debate anyone on this, man or woman, because it's completely pointless. i've heard all of the arguments and they all fall flat for me. nobody (including me) is actually looking for debate on this topic, they just want to express their views.

in my opinion, the only moral and logical argument for abortion is that it's a terrible and awful act but not all terrible and awful acts should be illegal. almost nobody pro-choice presents this argument. they have a pile of garbage arguments they cycle through.

ok, that was seriously my last abortion post.
08-12-2017 , 01:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
no, i'm not worried about that, but there are very few republicans who i would vote for in the first place. maybe like 2 or 3 that are serving now. and neither of them want to "round people up and transport them." i don't identify with that ideology so try not to be so insulting. what else shall you randomly accuse me of?

the only ideology that i identify with is to examine every issue on a case by case basis.
You seem to be panicking about gender issues, but you don't care that families are being torn apart? It seems to me that freedom isn't very important to you after all.

Quote:
don't care about the womb, care about what's inside it.
Well then don't make stupid arguments like "The fetus isn't part of the woman's body." That's completely irrelevant since the fetus needs a woman's body to survive. Sounds like you haven't thought about the issue to any degree of depth at all.
08-12-2017 , 01:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
How seamlessly this transitioned from virtue signaling leftist liberal snowflakes to "black people".
I used it as an example of the tactics of leftists. People were trying to get Maher fired. He's a comedian, he says things that are out of line sometimes, but people should be able to understand where he's coming from. Also, from all reports he's deeply involved with black people in his personal life. None of them (the really famous ones), came to his defence.

Ice Cube saying he shouldn't use the N word is the absolute height of hypocrisy. Ice Cube did more damage to the black community than thousands of David Dukes ever could.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
You believe in freedom except for peoples ability to define their gender. Got it.

Funny how nearly everyone that screams about freedom actually means freedom to act exactly how they think people should act and no different.

Also interesting how the example of said freedom is ALWAYS the freedom to discriminate.
It's unfortunate that the entire left has somehow lost IQ points in the last few years. To have freedom, true freedom, you're going to have to put up with some hate. To have free speech, you will have to be offended by some speech. That's the way things work. That's how this ALL works, you dummy. You can't have one without the other.

Christ.
08-12-2017 , 01:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
don't care about the womb, care about what's inside it. ok, that was seriously my last post on abortion.
Since you are ignoring me anyways, I don't feel I'm asking you to go beyond your self imposed limit here.

This is a surprisingly non-standard RWNJ take on abortion, and a not particularly odious one at that. In fact, if there were an army of surrogate birth mothers, along with these presumed estates of foster care... so that a responsible couple, who just happened to get a defective condom, aren't punished by one of them having to carry child for nine months... it might even kinda be in hailing distance of something that might make sense.

No connection with the SJWers, of course.
08-12-2017 , 01:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
i'm not going to debate anyone on this, man or woman, because it's completely pointless. i've heard all of the arguments and they all fall flat for me. nobody (including me) is actually looking for debate on this topic, they just want to express their views.



in my opinion, the only moral and logical argument for abortion is that it's a terrible and awful act but not all terrible and awful acts should be illegal. almost nobody pro-choice presents this argument. they have a pile of garbage arguments they cycle through.



ok, that was seriously my last abortion post.


So you are okay with women defending themselves against you since you are convicted past a point of being willing argue?
08-12-2017 , 01:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
You seem to be panicking about gender issues, but you don't care that families are being torn apart? It seems to me that freedom isn't very important to you after all.
Who's family has been torn apart? Why do you think I want families to be torn apart. I just said I want to increase immigration with Latin America. STOP BEING SO DISHONEST AND ACCUSING ME OF THINGS THAT I DIDN'T SAY.


Quote:
Well then don't make stupid arguments like "The fetus isn't part of the woman's body." That's completely irrelevant since the fetus needs a woman's body to survive. Sounds like you haven't thought about the issue to any degree of depth at all.
it's attached to the woman's body. a common pro-choice argument is that the fetus is the woman's body. i've thought about the issue 10x more than you and can make the pro-choice argument 10x better than you.
08-12-2017 , 01:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
You seem to be panicking about gender issues, but you don't care that families are being torn apart? It seems to me that freedom isn't very important to you after all.
Everyone, notice the appeal to emotion in this statement. Lol, typical. "But bro.. families are being torn apart!"


Quote:
Well then don't make stupid arguments like "The fetus isn't part of the woman's body." That's completely irrelevant since the fetus needs a woman's body to survive. Sounds like you haven't thought about the issue to any degree of depth at all.
I suspect idiocy like this is why people like him don't ever want to really discuss abortion, which is exactly why I don't want to discuss abortion either. It just makes my head hurt.
08-12-2017 , 01:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
So you are okay with women defending themselves against you since you are convicted past a point of being willing argue?
yea, but i won't respond.
08-12-2017 , 01:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
I used it as an example of the tactics of leftists. People were trying to get Maher fired. He's a comedian, he says things that are out of line sometimes, but people should be able to understand where he's coming from. Also, from all reports he's deeply involved with black people in his personal life. None of them (the really famous ones), came to his defence.

Ice Cube saying he shouldn't use the N word is the absolute height of hypocrisy. Ice Cube did more damage to the black community than thousands of David Dukes ever could.



It's unfortunate that the entire left has somehow lost IQ points in the last few years. To have freedom, true freedom, you're going to have to put up with some hate. To have free speech, you will have to be offended by some speech. That's the way things work. That's how this ALL works, you dummy. You can't have one without the other.

Christ.
Shouldn't you be off investigating pizzagate?
08-12-2017 , 01:17 PM
If only hard and social science didn't exist Augie's claims would make a lot of sense.
08-12-2017 , 01:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
don't care about the womb, care about what's inside it.

ok, that was seriously my last post on abortion.
Lol
08-12-2017 , 01:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
Who's family has been torn apart? Why do you think I want families to be torn apart. I just said I want to increase immigration with Latin America. STOP BEING SO DISHONEST AND ACCUSING ME OF THINGS THAT I DIDN'T SAY.
You are panicking about the left and talking about how ant-freedom they are. And your example is gender?

And apparently you don't even know that the government is forcing families apart? Sorry, but you sound extremely ignorant when it comes to real issues regarding freedom.

Quote:
it's attached to the woman's body. a common pro-choice argument is that the fetus is the woman's body. i've thought about the issue 10x more than you and can make the pro-choice argument 10x better than you.
So women don't have the freedom to remove things attached to their body? That can be a consistent argument, but it is not really a pro-freedom argument.
08-12-2017 , 01:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
yea, but i won't respond.


So why object to being described as far right and sexist while those are your convictions?

It's pretty miserable that you'll never actually end abortions using prohibition. You already impose misery into those situations which are none your business just promoting the notion.

And imposed misery is the result of that prohibition enacted as recorded when and where it has already happened.

Misery, not from freedom but from direct, clear, and intentional imposition.
08-12-2017 , 01:20 PM
Hey guys, white nationalists are rioting in Virginia, but the LEFT is the real problem .
08-12-2017 , 01:23 PM
Quote:
Ice Cube did more damage to the black community than thousands of David Dukes ever could.
This racist moron seriously thinks this bull****.

BUT NEED I REMIND YOU ABOUT THE LEFT AND GENDER THINGS!
08-12-2017 , 01:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
If only hard and social science didn't exist Augie's claims would make a lot of sense.
that one is the best one. frenzied feminists claiming science is on their side. that somehow science demonstrates a fetus is not a person. shows how deep down the rabbit hole of ignorance and ideology they've gone.

science gave us the insane technology that allows us to see the heartbeat of the fetus after only 21 days.

21 days is the point of the pregnancy when the feminist compares the fetus to a ball of snot.

who's being scientific?
08-12-2017 , 01:25 PM
Quote:
There were also fights Friday night, when hundreds of white nationalists marched through the University of Virginia campus carrying torches.
Torch-carrying white nationalist mobs parading around the campus of a major university.

But they probably have good views on gender, so it's cool.

      
m