Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The SJW thread The SJW thread

08-12-2017 , 11:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
i believe in freedom. if you want to open "master's sub shop" and hang a sign in the door that says NO BLACKS that should be totally legal.

and then me, and other like minded people, would never eat there, and you would quickly go out of business.

See how freedom works? you condescending dummy.

your version of freedom is to utilize the government to point a gun at anyone who would hang the NO BLACKS sign in their door. wow, you're so tolerant. how about you just don't eat there and tell your friends not to eat there.
What if in fact it didn't go out of business?
08-12-2017 , 11:35 AM
Poor racists not getting to be racist. I can't think of a bigger problem in society right now. If only we could fix this and allow more overt racism we would be living in some kind of utopia.
08-12-2017 , 11:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
the way people treat other people, in general
That isn't evidence.

Maybe if people like you weren't constantly ragging on transgendered people about how what they feel isnt real, then "The way people treat other people" would change so that living as a transgendered person would be just as easy as living as a cis person.
08-12-2017 , 11:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
it's absolutely pathetic that you can't get off this point of me not wanting to name more groups...
Dude, once again, you and only you are the one placing peeps into groups... remember? You placed a buncha peeps in this group you call "Leftist". We... me and everyone else ITT... are trying to figure out who these peeps that you and only you... have placed in the group you call "Leftist" might happen to be.

Right now the conversation is at this standstill...

Augie_: Those "Leftist" blah/blah/blah !!!1!
<us>: Who are the peeps you are placing in this group you call the "Leftists"?
Augie_: I refuse to explain.


Can't you see that if you expect this conversation to continue beyond this stopping point you are going to necessarily have to become more forthcoming. I don't understand why you would attempt to initiate a conversation, then immediately refuse to engage in said conversation.

Quote:
... i'm done responding to this point...
If you mean you are done posting ITT... well good riddance. You haven't show the slightest desire to engage in "constructive conversation". You add nothing. Be gone.

If, however, you are planning to continue spewing about these "Leftists", and continue to refuse to explain what you mean... well you can expect me to ask you the same 100% relavant Qs I have been asking. Every single time you spam this thread with your trollish spew. Every single damn time. So... you got some deciding to do.

Quote:
... he says he's a socialist, i think that's pretty good evidence.
First of all, I'm not "the left". I'm a Neo-Gorean. We believe that all woman, but especially feminists, should be reduced to sex slaves. For their own good. We also believe in fighting for ISIS. So... you really need to stop placing peeps in groups... once again. Don't you have any other plays in your trix-box than incessantly placing peeps into groups like you always do? Are you completely incapable of viewing peeps as individuals?

Second, no, just no. If I said I'm a tree... that don't make me a tree
08-12-2017 , 11:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
You believe in freedom except for peoples ability to define their gender. Got it.

Funny how nearly everyone that screams about freedom actually means freedom to act exactly how they think people should act and no different.

Also interesting how the example of said freedom is ALWAYS the freedom to discriminate.
wow you actually made a point, congrats. too bad it's not a very good one.

i am in favor of the freedom of anyone to proclaim they are anything. doesn't make it true.

this is always the accusation. more dishonesty. somehow my speech is restricting someone else's freedom. everyone that levies this accusation knows they are lying but you really have to flail and grasp to fight against the idea of free speech.

me telling you that you should not do a transition is not the same as me voting for some law that would restrict your transition.

get your ostrich head out of the sand and quit lying.
08-12-2017 , 11:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
So... how exactly are we supposed to come to a unified treatment of psychological problems? Or in your whole EVERYONE SHOULD BE FREE TO DO WHATEVER ALWAYS screed, then anyone can become a psychiatrist and use whatever junk science they want to treat people? How do you protect those in a free market from going to a quack psychiatrist who will cause harm vs. going to an actual psychiatrist who uses generally accepted science to treat their patients?

Your ideas are horribly inconsistent
i'm fine with regulations. i'd like them to be on the local level whenever possible and on the state level at the most.
08-12-2017 , 11:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
... your version of freedom is to utilize the government to point a gun at anyone who would hang the NO BLACKS sign in their door...
Well, I'm not a "Leftist", so I know you aren't including me in this stereotype. I believe the way to deal freedom here is what historically happened. Like what these our fine folk did when they were in college...



This wasn't a protest BTW. It was NVDA. The purpose wasn't to change the "secret inner heart" of anyone. The purpose was to disrupt the flow of profits to the r-word-ers who owned the segregated lunch counters. It worked because, and only because, those r-word-ers profits were substantially disrupted.

Which side of the governments pointing guns are you on now... fool !!!1!
08-12-2017 , 11:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
I've never advocated pointing a gun at anybody.

People that choose not to follow the CRA can receive fines, ever increasing for each instance until they change their minds about discriminating against protected classes or go out of business. Works the exact same way as just telling my friends not to eat there right, with the added benefit that a bunch of racist dick bags can't keep the other racist dick bag in business.

Are you against the CRA?
almost every big government person fails to see this point. so don't feel bad about this one.

ANY government action against another entity comes included with a gun pointed at them.

without this threat of force, why would the business pay the fines? they will just ignore them.

why do you pay taxes? because if you don't, the government will arrest you. if you resist their arrest, they will point a gun at you. if you continue to resist, they will shoot you.

this chain of events applies to EVERY government action. so in my opinion, it should only be used in extreme cases of injustice. someone getting their feelings hurt because of a racist store owner would not qualify, for me.
08-12-2017 , 12:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
wow you actually made a point, congrats. too bad it's not a very good one.

i am in favor of the freedom of anyone to proclaim they are anything. doesn't make it true.

this is always the accusation. more dishonesty. somehow my speech is restricting someone else's freedom. everyone that levies this accusation knows they are lying but you really have to flail and grasp to fight against the idea of free speech.

me telling you that you should not do a transition is not the same as me voting for some law that would restrict your transition.

get your ostrich head out of the sand and quit lying.
You claim to be all about freedom (an obvious lie but let's pretend it's true). Hypothetically, every person on earth decides tomorrow to claim they are the opposite of their birth sex.

How does this effect you in away way? Why would you care?

Isn't this freedom?

I thought your rights end at the tip of your nose?

This is the huge lie at the centre of your half baked philosophy.
08-12-2017 , 12:02 PM
Eventually the Bible can be introduced as a local level DSM replacement.
08-12-2017 , 12:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
almost every big government person fails to see this point. so don't feel bad about this one.

ANY government action against another entity comes included with a gun pointed at them.

without this threat of force, why would the business pay the fines? they will just ignore them.

why do you pay taxes? because if you don't, the government will arrest you. if you resist their arrest, they will point a gun at you. if you continue to resist, they will shoot you.

this chain of events applies to EVERY government action. so in my opinion, it should only be used in extreme cases of injustice. someone getting their feelings hurt because of a racist store owner would not qualify, for me.
Jesus ****ing christ you're an ACist.

Why didn't you say so in the first place? I wouldn't have ****ing bothered.
08-12-2017 , 12:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
Maybe if people like you weren't constantly ragging on transgendered people about how what they feel isnt real, then "The way people treat other people" would change so that living as a transgendered person would be just as easy as living as a cis person.
lol. like i said in another post, i lived in vegas for 10 years, i encountered plenty of transgender people. if we interacted i was always nice and friendly. i did not let them know they are in the grips of mental illness. my speech is only going to be found by people going out and looking for it.

and you're giving a total load of crap that i'm contributing to their lack of acceptance. being transgender is trendy right now. summer camps are reporting 4% transgender campers. virtue signaling SJWs give them rounds of applause in the public eye and then in real life they are outcast.

recently i read an article titled "why can't my famous transgender friends get laid?" where the author was perplexed about why straight men didn't want to sleep with their transgender female friends (men who identify as women). hmm, gee, i wonder...

it's not easy to live as a transgender person because humans have an instinctual reaction when presented with some bizarre behavior. it's a physiological reaction, not an intellectual one.

again, everyone should have the freedom to dress and act however they want. but when you're engaged in highly deviant behavior you shouldn't wonder why the world isn't treating you normally. it's because we're a bunch of slightly evolved primates. sometimes people have to change themselves to fit perfectly into society.
08-12-2017 , 12:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
You claim to be all about freedom (an obvious lie but let's pretend it's true). Hypothetically, every person on earth decides tomorrow to claim they are the opposite of their birth sex.

How does this effect you in away way? Why would you care?

Isn't this freedom?

I thought your rights end at the tip of your nose?

This is the huge lie at the centre of your half baked philosophy.
it doesn't. i would care because all of humanity will have gone insane. yes, this is freedom. so i would say, "wow the world is insane" and i wouldn't say "i guess gender is fluid"
08-12-2017 , 12:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
Jesus ****ing christ you're an ACist.

Why didn't you say so in the first place? I wouldn't have ****ing bothered.
what's an ACist?
08-12-2017 , 12:12 PM
please, everyone give me more examples of freedom that i'm against. i'll beat them down with my wooden club carved in the shape of an american eagle and painted red white and blue
08-12-2017 , 12:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
... ANY government action against another entity comes included with a gun pointed at them...
Good point. Here's a perfect example...



Without the government coming in and shooting their guns, these fine CIO folk would have enjoying a peaceful and successful sit down strike. This isn't an example of an "extreme case of injustice", in fact it isn't injustice at all.

So... Mr.Freedom... do you disapprove of how the government violently suppressed these historical strikes ??
08-12-2017 , 12:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
Good point. Here's a perfect example...



Without the government coming in and shooting their guns, these fine CIO folk would have enjoying a peaceful and successful sit down strike. This isn't an example of an "extreme case of injustice", in fact it isn't injustice at all.

So... Mr.Freedom... do you disapprove of how the government violently suppressed these historical strikes ??
i'm responding to let you know i have you on ignore, but i'll respond long enough to ask about this picture. i don't know what it's a picture of but i'll be glad to respond to the details if you give them to me.
08-12-2017 , 12:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
what's an ACist?


A far-right type who brags about freedom, but is basically 'neo-gorean friendly'.
08-12-2017 , 12:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
what's an ACist?
Right wing idiots living in an total fantasy world. In other words, you.
08-12-2017 , 12:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
what's an ACist?
is that an anarchist? why do you think i'm an anarchist when i just told you i'm in favor of a strong local government and a strong state government?

i just don't think the federal government should be regulating people's daily interactions on the ground.

perhaps the local government shouldn't either but i like the idea of cities passing their own laws which supersede any federal law (but doesn't supersede the constitution).
08-12-2017 , 12:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_
i'm responding to let you know i have you on ignore, but i'll respond long enough to ask about this picture. i don't know what it's a picture of but i'll be glad to respond to the details if you give them to me.
Putting me on ignore ain't going to stop me asking you the relevant Qs.

As I mentioned, there is no way for this conversation to logically move forward without you clarifing which peeps you are grouping together and calling the "Leftists". Once again, I'd really suggest you try to move away from always grouping peeps together... like you always seem to do. Instead, why don't you try viewing peeps as individuals ??

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flint_sit-down_strike
08-12-2017 , 12:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
A far-right type who brags about freedom, but is basically 'neo-gorean friendly'.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
Right wing idiots living in an total fantasy world. In other words, you.


i love how "freedom" is so triggering to government loving leftists. i'm so scary and threatening, better call me a racist and bigot and sexist.

here's all of my political views:

abortion - illegal
gay marriage - legal
gay adoption - legal
drugs - all legal

i'd like to see obamacare repealed and then replaced with a limited expansion of medicare, govt. subsidies for private health insurance, and grandfathering of all preexisting conditions covered by obamacare.

i'd like to increase immigration with latin america and i don't want to build a wall. i do want to hire more border agents and decrease immigration and refugees from the middle east.

if you put me on a map you will find that i'm barely right of center. now in todays political climate being slightly right of center is just as good as being hitler.
08-12-2017 , 12:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
Putting me on ignore ain't going to stop me asking you the relevant Qs.

As I mentioned, there is no way for this conversation to logically move forward without you clarifing which peeps you are grouping together and calling the "Leftists". Once again, I'd really suggest you try to move away from always grouping peeps together... like you always seem to do. Instead, why don't you try viewing peeps as individuals ??

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flint_sit-down_strike
oh ok, back on ignore, troll
08-12-2017 , 12:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_


i love how "freedom" is so triggering to government loving leftists. i'm so scary and threatening, better call me a racist and bigot and sexist.

here's all of my political views:

abortion - illegal
gay marriage - legal
gay adoption - legal
drugs - all legal

i'd like to see obamacare repealed and then replaced with a limited expansion of medicare, govt. subsidies for private health insurance, and grandfathering of all preexisting conditions covered by obamacare.

i'd like to increase immigration with latin america and i don't want to build a wall. i do want to hire more border agents and decrease immigration and refugees from the middle east.

if you put me on a map you will find that i'm barely right of center. now in todays political climate being slightly right of center is just as good as being hitler.
Nobody called you Hitler. I called you an idiot because you have a tissue thin political view that is almost entirely based on protecting the rights of the worst of humanity.
08-12-2017 , 12:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by augie_




sexist.



here's all of my political views:



abortion - illegal

gay marriage - legal

gay adoption - legal

drugs - all legal



.


Brag all you want, but you are not the boss of women or fetus.

How can you object to people you imagine describing you as sexist when illegal abortion exclusively targets women?

      
m