Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The SJW thread The SJW thread

08-08-2017 , 09:38 AM
Trumpists appear clueless about what the trump regime is made from.
08-08-2017 , 09:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Trumpists appear clueless
No need to go beyond this ever.
08-08-2017 , 10:02 AM
Transgender people are in fortified SJW positions and them trumps fools charged following dear father with lies, proclaimations of manhood, and 3rd hand faith.
08-08-2017 , 10:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
... You're already 0 - 1 on legal issues, but we can try again. Going to the NLRB site, here seem to be the reasons most applicable to the case at hand...
When I said I organize earlier, I meant that I'm a union activist. What you are discussing is called "Solidarity Unionism" or "Section Seven" organizing. My union literally wrote the book on this shiz.

His initial claim is frivolous on the face of it... Google senior management was trying to "shame him"... LMFAO. He's an at-will employee, his bosses can fire him at any time, for any reason, or for no reason. It doesn't make a lick-o-sense to begin with.

He'd have to file a second claim regarding his dismissal, and that claim too would be frivolous on the face of it. Google is claiming that they fired the fool over the content of his 'manifesto', not in retaliation for his previously filed and frivolous NLRB claim. Guess what... that 'manifesto' would get you fired from ~499.5 of the F500 companies. This is a complete non-starter.

Further, he said he filed a NLRB complaint, then threatened a legal action. Taking legal action invalidates your NLRB claim, and any claim you might have under the CA-DLSE. Which is another good point... if this fool had any idea what he was doing, he'd be going after Google first through the CA-DLSE... then consider the NLRB... then last consider Superior Court.

What really happened was this...

The dude was doing fine in live because he had containment between (a) the practical day-2-day shiz of having a career and bills and shiz, -vs- (b) his fantasy hobby life, which is full of magical OSJers & SJWers & conspiracies theories about college campusses, and all this hilarious crapola Phree Screech Rites youz guyz eat up as pure entertainment.

Then he had a "psychic break" or some such nonsense... his containment failed... and now he's out looking for a job. That, and he's managed to make himself the laughing and pointing center of the entire interwebs at this current moment. All because he couldn't distinguish fantasy (this SJWer conspiracy theory gibberish) -vs- reality (a six figure career gerb), and he just couldn't keep his "crazy" under his hat.

Sad.
08-08-2017 , 10:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
It is incumbent on the one making the claim first. There is not a wall of research.




But once again, I have to do all the work.

This is the sum of trans-gender brain research. One team, in Spain, who used an MRI to examine the brains of 24 female-to-males and 18 male-to-females. All other work cites this work.

There were some low-level pheromone tests as well. And that's it.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...sgender-brain/

So, yeah, there's almost ZERO research on trans-gender brain differences.
You don't have to do any work. Once someone says that science and psychology are defrauding the world to force some agenda, we're into conspiracy theories. I'm not interested in having to justify the fields themselves and why it's not all a secret plot. We're just done having any kind of discussion other than mockery.
08-08-2017 , 10:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladesman87
You don't have to do any work. Once someone says that science and psychology are defrauding the world to force some agenda, we're into conspiracy theories. I'm not interested in having to justify the fields themselves and why it's not all a secret plot. We're just done having any kind of discussion other than mockery.
When John Hopkins pioneered and then ceased Gender Reassignment surgery (and then resumed the practice), were they scientists or conspiracy theorists?

https://thinkprogress.org/johns-hopk...-5c9c428184c1/

It's fine though - I just know you don't care about citations. It's all good.
08-08-2017 , 10:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
When I said I organize earlier, I meant that I'm a union activist. What you are discussing is called "Solidarity Unionism" or "Section Seven" organizing. My union literally wrote the book on this shiz.

His initial claim is frivolous on the face of it... Google senior management was trying to "shame him"... LMFAO. He's an at-will employee, his bosses can fire him at any time, for any reason, or for no reason. It doesn't make a lick-o-sense to begin with.

He'd have to file a second claim regarding his dismissal, and that claim too would be frivolous on the face of it. Google is claiming that they fired the fool over the content of his 'manifesto', not in retaliation for his previously filed and frivolous NLRB claim. Guess what... that 'manifesto' would get you fired from ~499.5 of the F500 companies. This is a complete non-starter.

Further, he said he filed a NLRB complaint, then threatened a legal action. Taking legal action invalidates your NLRB claim, and any claim you might have under the CA-DLSE. Which is another good point... if this fool had any idea what he was doing, he'd be going after Google first through the CA-DLSE... then consider the NLRB... then last consider Superior Court.

What really happened was this...

The dude was doing fine in live because he had containment between (a) the practical day-2-day shiz of having a career and bills and shiz, -vs- (b) his fantasy hobby life, which is full of magical OSJers & SJWers & conspiracies theories about college campusses, and all this hilarious crapola Phree Screech Rites youz guyz eat up as pure entertainment.

Then he had a "psychic break" or some such nonsense... his containment failed... and now he's out looking for a job. That, and he's managed to make himself the laughing and pointing center of the entire interwebs at this current moment. All because he couldn't distinguish fantasy (this SJWer conspiracy theory gibberish) -vs- reality (a six figure career gerb), and he just couldn't keep his "crazy" under his hat.

Sad.
How can you deny his lived experience, you bigot?

I'll agree that these cultural conversations probably have little impact on farmers in Kansas. However, if you don't think he's in the epicenter of this type of conversations, I don't know what to tell you. Enjoy living in your fantasy land I guess.
08-08-2017 , 10:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
You're already 0 - 1 on legal issues, but we can try again.

Going to the NLRB site, here seem to be the reasons most applicable to the case at hand.

You can file these charges for both Discrimination and Retaliation:

Because the employee(s) talked to other employees about wages, hours, or other terms and conditions of employment (including communications on social media)
Because the employee(s) complained to the employer about terms and conditions of employment


Considering the investigations Google is currently under for unfair labor practices, his manifesto was certainly in response to such allegations:

https://www.google.com/search?q=goog...hrome&ie=UTF-8

I'm sure NLRB cases are complicated but doing 5 more minutes of research than you did, it doesn't seem like his case is without merit. I don't know if the NLRB can enforce Codes of Conduct guidelines, but it seems Google does support "openness" in their manual - and this would definitely be a breech of such an employment contract.
I thought you were against employees suing their employers?
08-08-2017 , 10:41 AM
Neuroticism. Is it funny people are googling that or what?
08-08-2017 , 10:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
When John Hopkins pioneered and then ceased Gender Reassignment surgery (and then resumed the practice), were they scientists or conspiracy theorists?

https://thinkprogress.org/johns-hopk...-5c9c428184c1/

It's fine though - I just know you don't care about citations. It's all good.
Don't care. I mean, you've thrown out science as being a big conspiracy. There's no need to talk about it.
08-08-2017 , 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
How can you deny his lived experience...
Wat. I'm not denying his lived experience. I'm simply pointing out that he, for whatever reasons, lost his containment between his SJWer fantasy live (a part of his lived experience), and his livelihood and career (another part of his lived experience).

It's just like if I took my Neo-Gorean "crazy" outside of Los Dos Poliards, and into my IRL. My virtual interaction with youz guyz is a part of my lived experience, just like the time I spend IRL with my friends & family & Sabo. But if I lost my containment, and started mixing these two thingees up... only bad shiz is going to happen to me on the IRL side.

Quote:
... I'll agree that these cultural conversations probably have little impact on farmers in Kansas. However, if you don't think he's in the epicenter of this type of conversations...
Yeah, he's got his 15 minutes of fame working overtime right now. That's not in fantasyland... that's the real shiz. I ain't in denial about that. But the dude is in serious denial if he didn't realize he was committing career suicide by the HR dept the instant he smashed "send all" with his 'manifesto'. He worked at a publicly traded F500 company for goodness sake... it was a lock he'd be unemployed 12 hours later.

But in a few days, his 15+ minutes will expire. There will be still another silly tweet by a complete nobody at an FBS game, or some such gibberish. The Deplorable-Entertainment-Complex will move on to the next bright shiny object to entertain youz guyz. The ex-google fool certainly has good friends & family who are right now telling him to him shut his stupid pie-hole, and start worrying about finding a new job.

I'm guessing he struggles with addiction, or has some other underlying and unrelated problems, that triggered this career threatening mental meltdown.
08-08-2017 , 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
I thought you were against employees suing their employers?
In general, I am. I'm pro-At Will state as I think Unions in general are worse for productivity than a benefit.

That said - if I 'effectively' sign an employment agreement with you with handbook that encourages "diversity of thought" and openness, and you break that agreement (or just outright lie about your principles), then there could be a case for punishment.

Really I'm just hoping the market takes care of this. I imagine Google will have a tough time attracting other talented employees considering they just told 50% of the marketplace to go **** themselves.
08-08-2017 , 10:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!

But in a few days, his 15+ minutes will expire. There will be still another silly tweet by a complete nobody at an FBS game, or some such gibberish. The Deplorable-Entertainment-Complex will move on to the next bright shiny object to entertain youz guyz. The ex-google fool certainly has good friends & family who are right now telling him to him shut his stupid pie-hole, and start worrying about finding a new job.
To be fair, there's an old axiom - "Nobody has a higher unemployment rate than whistleblowers". That said, seems like this guy will land on his feet. Already has a job offer from WikiLeaks, not that that means much.
08-08-2017 , 10:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
In general, I am. I'm pro-At Will state as I think Unions in general are worse for productivity than a benefit.

That said - if I 'effectively' sign an employment agreement with you with handbook that encourages "diversity of thought" and openness, and you break that agreement (or just outright lie about your principles), then there could be a case for punishment.

Really I'm just hoping the market takes care of this. I imagine Google will have a tough time attracting other talented employees considering they just told 50% of the marketplace to go **** themselves.
Yes, I'm sure Google, one of the top employers in the world, with an amazing campus, and incredible stock options upon hire, will have just the toughest time in the world attracting talented employees.

Thanks for proving that "The markets will take care of it" talking point is ****ing stupid. You're the best!
08-08-2017 , 10:57 AM
biology phd grad from harvard gets fired from google for stating basic scientific facts

short google in about a year and make a bunch of money
08-08-2017 , 11:05 AM
"Basic Science Facts"
08-08-2017 , 11:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
... That said - if I 'effectively' sign an employment agreement with you with handbook that encourages "diversity of thought" and openness, and you break that agreement (or just outright lie about your principles), then there could be a case for punishment...
It's not an "effective" contract. When companies have you sign the employee handbook, that is indeed a binding legal & written contract. BTW: the main reason they have you sign it on the regular is an attempt to forestall employees from claiming they also have a valid oral contract.

The employee handbook will also state that certain communications are improper at work, regardless of this generous policy of openness. At the very most, an employee could claim they shouldn't be disciplined for the first time they run afoul of this company policy. But they would be "written up", and subject to discipline if there was ever a repeat violation. No company is going to grant free rein on this "openness".

Quote:
... Really I'm just hoping the market takes care of this. I imagine Google will have a tough time attracting other talented employees considering they just told 50% of the marketplace to go **** themselves.
LMFAO @crap like this SJWer conspiracy theory gibberish being believed by by 50% of the population. That would make it, what... 20x more popular than 911 trutherism. ZOMG youz guyz gotta get out of your parent's basements more often. I'd say 5% is the max penetration... if that.
08-08-2017 , 11:14 AM
no refutation from any scientists, only from vice presidents of diversity

its sad that googles going down this route
08-08-2017 , 11:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iron Tamer
no refutation from any scientists, only from vice presidents of diversity its sad that googles going down this route
I can only guess that you've never had a real job. This isn't how the real world works.
08-08-2017 , 11:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iron Tamer
biology phd grad from harvard gets fired from google for stating basic scientific facts

short google in about a year and make a bunch of money
This might be the dumbest post itt and that is really saying something.

Please do short Google with every dollar you have. I can't see how you don't make millions.
08-08-2017 , 11:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
I can only guess that you've never had a real job. This isn't how the real world works.
Shame Trolly and talking about the real world and how it works.....hahahaha!

Although, I'll give you credit for some of the Union and job stuff you posted today. Maybe you were just....um..."high on your own supply" yesterday or something.
08-08-2017 , 11:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
I can only guess that you've never had a real job. This isn't how the real world works.
you realize this is the topic of this week

if he was wrong there'd be hundreds of biologists coming out and condemning him

the fact he isn't and google fired him for wrongthink and 1/2 of the google worker base is upset about this is telling
08-08-2017 , 11:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
This might be the dumbest post itt and that is really saying something.

Please do short Google with every dollar you have. I can't see how you don't make millions.
thank you, I hope I do make millions
08-08-2017 , 11:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Shame Trolly and talking about the real world and how it works.....hahahaha!... Although, I'll give you credit for some of the Union and job stuff you posted today...
I was a manufacturing engineer. I was also a vendor, and proly worked on site at ~3 dozen different F500 Co factories. If I had posted shiz like the ex-googler's manifesto on those companies internal networks... I'd have been escorted to the exit, and barred & banned from every single one of those job sites. If an employee had posted that kinda shiz on the company network, while on company time, they'd be cleaning out their desk under the watchful eyes of loss prevention.

Now, if youz guyz think that's just some shiz I'm making up... or if youz guyz think this is a sign of some kinda "Leftist" SJWer conspiracy running rampant through the manufacturing sector... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... what can I say, that's not how the real world works.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iron Tamer
you realize this is the topic of this week

if he was wrong there'd be hundreds of biologists coming out and condemning him

the fact he isn't and google fired him for wrongthink and 1/2 of the google worker base is upset about this is telling
Man, you're like the Barry Bonds of stupid.
08-08-2017 , 11:56 AM
are you comparing your manufacturing job to google where people get 20% of their work time for independent pursuits and the company relys on the creative output of a small % of their 140 iq average worker base for a large portion of their productivity

please do tell us more about how your job gives you insight about how a bio phd should behave at google.

      
m