Religious and right gossip about transgender people openly discredits both religious and right. Personally chose straight off an abyss of talking about genitalia of others and greatness slogan chain email bot troll discriminators hooking for partisans and bathroom-scared folks.

Dolla dolla bill y'all!!!

Wait, shouldn't YOU also want YOUR "Civil Rights" moment?


Hm.


Follow-up Q: You know that if you were smart enough to not tell on yourself constantly, you'd probably be smart enough to not believe the stupid bull**** you believe in the first place, right?

Flying guillotines, here they come.

Ok, so, if a person walks to up to me, stares me dead in the eyes, and says, without prompting, and I quote,

"Being nice,"

then I should definitely consider this a big and bright red flag, in your humble opinion?

Can we all be animals?

Clovis is already a dog but if ST and master are both pigs then I want to be a dog too.

No, you should, sit down and be quiet like an obedient sheep.

Damn....I was going to let you pick your species, but looks like you get to be a sheep. Wait...you may look like a sheep on the outside, but what species of dog brain do you have on the inside?

I stated it up thread, but it's incredibly true. The reason that teansgenderism is the hate du jour of the right is because it's the Currently Acceptable Bigotry, or CAB, of the country. Just a decade ago the CAB was homosexuality, but then they got beat to **** in every public poll, gay marriage became law and railing against gay people was not longer CAB. The same thing happened in the sixties. Black people and hippies were the CAB, but the right, once again, got their asses kicked six ways to sunday, lost the culture war, AIDS came about, they blamed it on the gays and a new CAB was born.

It's the same ****ing pattern every time. The fact that they continually fall for it is ****ing pathetic.

Ok, so, where we're at is here:

Authoritarian shepherds shout 'Being Nice' as a battle cry when they're about to get their authority on?

And sheep like you listen and obey.

So you're just gonna grab the stupid and for a TD with it in The Puppy Bowl, huh? Interesting approach.

Not sure which is more disturbing. That someone can spout such indecipherable dribble or that someone else can come along and understand it and actually reply to it. Like i get where yo're coming from man. WTF?

They speak in code, like Bynars.

You're a noob, so you don't know. There is no "they". There's only one. Few, if any, can even begin to decipher his ramblings. Behold...



Man, about this super-fool J.Damore, who until earlier today was pulling down six figures at google... I figured when the deplorables were all babbling about this shiz it was just another nothing-burger... like some nobody tweeting from a bowling alley... you know, the same-old same-old with these clowns. Boy was I wrong.

Check out this shiz from the NY Times...

Seriously... the deplorables are spamming the interwebs with this crap, just like those tweets from the bowling alleys, and all their usual trash, because they don't ever even bother reading this shiz to begin (looking at you FoldnDark), they just spam, that's what they do... but this whole sad story just makes them look like the extreme lusers that they be. They should be burying this story, not spamming it.

I was thinking... how did this go down? Did the fool just wake up one morning and decide to throw away a six-figure career to be a hero on 4-chan for 7.56 hours? Well no... that would have been smart, compared to how this all went on down.

Instead the fool was literally high on his own supply. When he wiped off his donut encrusted forefinger, to push "send to all", and spam google.com with his odious manifesto... what did he expect to be doing 12 hours later...

... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

How far do you have to have you head up your own a-hole, to have reality so twisted backwards, that the F500 companies are the "Leftists", and the lowly employees are the "Rightest"... all the time waiting for the NLRB to ride to their rescue.

Once again, another good example of how peeps can be the masters of compartmentalization. Dude has a PHd, had a big league career, proly has good friends/family/etc... but he also had all this bizarre SJWer conspiracy theory running around all inside his brain. Today was the day that epic feat of compartmentalization catastrophically failed. Again... sad.

You just keep trying to win "Dumbest moron on the Internet" don't you.
Ok man, the prize is yours. Well done.

How come I didn't get two trophies... did you forget my participation trophy?

Anyways, I don't know why you keep saying I'm stupid. I'm not, you know that, and that's certainly not my reputation around here. So I'm not surewho your audience is here at all.

Dude, that quote I quoted from the former google fool shows he is clearly bat-poop insane. Like I said... he was high on his own supply. He didn't come in with a bad hangover, snapped, and smashed "send all". This was the culmination of a series of flat-out delusional events.

I'm giving even odds the fool checks himself into rehab/etc this week or next.

Which sentence is giving you trouble, the 1st or the 2nd?

Here's the 1st:


See religious people.
See religious and right-wing people.
See the gossip from religious and right-wing people.
See the gossip about transgender people from religious and right-wing people.
Gossip, religious and right-wing people, gossip.

See the gossip discredit both religious and right-wing people and ideologies.
Discredit, gossipers, discredit.

The 2nd sentence would take much longer to do in this style but master's response focuses on it. You should be able to work backwards.

You're calling a Harvard PhD a fool and claim to be smart with your rambling diatribes of mental applesauce. Get a grip.

Unless you have simply decided to cash out your bank of credibility - which I'm guessing your coffers aren't as full as you claim they are. Then more power to you.

Can't you just reply like a normal human being? Try going slowly and make one point at a time. Might help.

Nah, sorry I'm fluent in three languages but I still don't get it.

Yes, the dude is a fool. Yesterday he acted in a foolish manner. That is how you can tell who the fools are. As for me posting like a normal human been... well, that ain't going to happen.

You would have to know the basics of employment law in the US, and a little bit about how the NLRB & CA-DLSE do their business. Without wandering off into those weeds... suffice to say that the fool's reported actions and words show that he doesn't have the slightest idea about what he's yapping about, and has fled the lands of reality and reason.

It's also extremely telling that this was (a) a pattern of actions over an extended period of time, as opposed to (b) a one time aberrant event. Everyone can have that bad day and smash "send to all". That's not what happened here at all.

This last thingee is what makes me think he's going to be going on a little Betty Ford style vacation coming up ~ by Labor Day at the latest.

Is one of those three English by any chance?

Ok, so, ignoring how your appeals to authority, both real and fallacious, are wildly inconsistent, do you want to know how many PhDs you've called 'fools' just today, on this forum?

I made a joke in the other thread about how this fool apparently doesn't have a PhD in Diversity Manifesto Writing but I didn't imagine somebody would actually appeal to his PhD in any sort of seriousness.

You're such a lazy smack talker. Resign.

You're already 0 - 1 on legal issues, but we can try again.

Going to the NLRB site, here seem to be the reasons most applicable to the case at hand.

You can file these charges for both Discrimination and Retaliation:

Because the employee(s) talked to other employees about wages, hours, or other terms and conditions of employment (including communications on social media)
Because the employee(s) complained to the employer about terms and conditions of employment

Considering the investigations Google is currently under for unfair labor practices, his manifesto was certainly in response to such allegations:

https://www.google.com/search?q=goog...hrome&ie=UTF-8

I'm sure NLRB cases are complicated but doing 5 more minutes of research than you did, it doesn't seem like his case is without merit. I don't know if the NLRB can enforce Codes of Conduct guidelines, but it seems Google does support "openness" in their manual - and this would definitely be a breech of such an employment contract.