Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The SJW thread The SJW thread

08-07-2017 , 12:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Actually - in a country that values Free Speech, yes, you can.
What right does the government have to impose any penalty on what anyone calls anybody?

What kind of backwards thinking authoritarian are you?
So, to be clear, you are against workplace rights and civil rights laws? Who am I to say that all businesses must operate equally regardless of a customer is white or black? Who am I to say that a business cannot prefer advancement to one person over another simply because one is a man and the other is a woman?

Do I have that right?
08-07-2017 , 12:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
The second largest company in the world is being called out on their SJW bull****. You know, that little company that controls 2/3rds of all internet search traffic?

Have a good read, you should enjoy this one:
Google Manifesto
BAHAHAHAHA
08-07-2017 , 12:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
So, to be clear, you are against workplace rights and civil rights laws? Who am I to say that all businesses must operate equally regardless of a customer is white or black? Who am I to say that a business cannot prefer advancement to one person over another simply because one is a man and the other is a woman?

Do I have that right?
Not at all.

Policing speech has nothing to do with how you treat someone as a business.

If what you say has nothing to do with your policies as a business, then it doesn't matter what you say.

If you'd like a more nuanced explanation, see Ben Shapiro discussing the LA Clippers owner and boycotts:



Stop policing speech - I'm not interested in Thought Crimes.
08-07-2017 , 01:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Not at all.

Policing speech has nothing to do with how you treat someone as a business.

If what you say has nothing to do with your policies as a business, then it doesn't matter what you say.

If you'd like a more nuanced explanation, see Ben Shapiro discussing the LA Clippers owner and boycotts:



Stop policing speech - I'm not interested in Thought Crimes.
So once more, stop me if I'm wrong here, but if I am the boss of an establishment and greet my black employees each morning with "Good morning ******" even though I have no applicable slur to offer my white employees, that should be perfectly ok within the law? There is no discrimination being demonstrated?
08-07-2017 , 01:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
So once more, stop me if I'm wrong here, but if I am the boss of an establishment and greet my black employees each morning with "Good morning ******" even though I have no applicable slur to offer my white employees, that should be perfectly ok within the law? There is no discrimination being demonstrated?
So, you're equating me calling a "ze" a "he" with using the N-word?

One of these things is not like the other....

"Kindness is the excuse to exercise control."
08-07-2017 , 01:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
So, you're equating me calling a "ze" a "he" with using the N-word?

One of these things is not like the other....

"Kindness is the excuse to exercise control."
Are you refusing to answer the question? Pronouns such as ZE are incredibly rare. These laws will be used much more to prevent discrimination by an employer in a number of manners, Not simply pronoun use. However, in the case of pronoun use it will stop an employer from maliciously referring to a female employee as he, which for those who identify as female, yes might be as offensive as using the N word.

But you know that. You are using the pronoun excuse to attempt to squash a bill protecting transgendered people in their place of employ. I can only assume because you are a terrible human
08-07-2017 , 01:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
Are you refusing to answer the question? Pronouns such as ZE are incredibly rare. These laws will be used much more to prevent discrimination by an employer in a number of manners, Not simply pronoun use. However, in the case of pronoun use it will stop an employer from maliciously referring to a female employee as he, which for those who identify as female, yes might be as offensive as using the N word.

But you know that. You are using the pronoun excuse to attempt to squash a bill protecting transgendered people in their place of employ. I can only assume because you are a terrible human
Care to refute how the Canadians said it wasn't about pronouns and then it became about pronouns? No? You don't have a point? Yup. Obviously.
08-07-2017 , 01:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
The second largest company in the world is being called out on their SJW bull****...
So Larry Page & Sergey Brin, who hold controlling interest in google.com, are the big SJWers?

And... all you OSJers are bitter at google.com, because maybe youz guyz like bing.com better/whatev... and this is what it's all been about all tis time... a battle -vs- search engines ??

And once again... how does this all tie into having "stood up" to "real" r-word-ism ??
08-07-2017 , 01:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Care to refute how the Canadians said it wasn't about pronouns and then it became about pronouns? No. You don't have a point? Yup. Obviously.
Dumb****. The person who made it about pronouns was the idiot who decided adding 4 words to the Canadian bill of rights was an affront to his sensibilities.

Answer my questions above you coward
08-07-2017 , 01:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
Dumb****. The person who made it about pronouns was the idiot who decided adding 4 words to the Canadian bill of rights was an affront to his sensibilities.

Answer my questions above you coward
After you address the CUPE lawyer's statements, chicken****.
08-07-2017 , 01:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
So Larry Page & Sergey Brin, who hold controlling interest in google.com, are the big SJWers?

And... all you OSJers are bitter at google.com, because maybe youz guyz like bing.com better/whatev... and this is what it's all been about all tis time... a battle -vs- search engines ??

And once again... how does this all tie into having "stood up" to "real" r-word-ism ??
Dude, whatever you're smoking - you should stop.
08-07-2017 , 01:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
... Policing speech has nothing to do with how you treat someone as a business...
You seem to be confusing talking while on the job -vs- our 1st-A rights out in public. In the US, a landlord, while collecting rent, can't be calling black tenants n-word-ers. Once he quits collecting rent, and walks out into the street as a civilian, he can call black folk n-word-ers all-day-every-day.

Quote:
... If you'd like a more nuanced explanation, see Ben Shapiro discussing the LA Clippers owner and boycotts...
So... you don't believe civil society should be allowed to conduct boycotts? Wow, whose mister liberty now, a-hole. Besides, the Stirlings weren't forced out by any boycott anyways. They were bought out, at a record profit BTW, by their fellow NBA owners, under a long-standing and standard clause in all the NBA franchise agreements.

In other words... Ben Shapiro is a flippin' idiot, who doesn't even get his basic facts correct.
08-07-2017 , 01:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
After you address the CUPE lawyer's statements, chicken****.
Care to post them here? I'm not watching a twenty minute youtube video about a person responding to somebody else's comments. Post them verbatim or **** off, I'm not doing your work for you.

Cowardly piece of ****
08-07-2017 , 01:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
Care to post them here? I'm not watching a twenty minute youtube video about a person responding to somebody else's comments. Post them verbatim or **** off, I'm not doing your work for you.

Cowardly piece of ****
Go **** yourself! It's in the first 5 minutes. Refute it or concede. You're already wrong, so I don't care either way.
08-07-2017 , 01:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Dude, whatever you're smoking - you should stop.
Dude.

You said google.com was run by a buncha SJWers.
I pointed out that Page & Bringe run google.com.
That makes Page & Bringe a buncha SJWers...
by your very own damn statement.

If something this flippin' simple minded is beyond your ability to comprehend... perhaps you are the one who needs to cut back on your smoking.
08-07-2017 , 01:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
You seem to be confusing talking while on the job -vs- our 1st-A rights out in public. In the US, a landlord, while collecting rent, can't be calling black tenants n-word-ers. Once he quits collecting rent, and walks out into the street as a civilian, he can call black folk n-word-ers all-day-every-day.



So... you don't believe civil society should be allowed to conduct boycotts? Wow, whose mister liberty now, a-hole. Besides, the Stirlings weren't forced out by any boycott anyways. They were bought out, at a record profit BTW, by their fellow NBA owners, under a long-standing and standard clause in all the NBA franchise agreements.

In other words... Ben Shapiro is a flippin' idiot, who doesn't even get his basic facts correct.
I know you don't understand how things work, but you are a literal moron. And I mean that, with all due sincerity.
08-07-2017 , 01:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
Dude.

You said google.com was run by a buncha SJWers.
I pointed out that Page & Bringe run google.com.
That makes Page & Bringe a buncha SJWers...
by your very own damn statement.

If something this flippin' simple minded is beyond your ability to comprehend... perhaps you are the one who needs to cut back on your smoking.
Yes, I'm sure Larry and Sergei are a bunch of Leftist/SJWers. Do you think they single handedly do everything at Google? We should check to see how their code updates are going at Search, Maps, Autonomous Vehicles, Google Home Pods, and Android. They must be busy guys.
08-07-2017 , 01:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Stop policing speech - I'm not interested in Thought Crimes.

Why are you policing speech by telling people to stop using their speech to police speech?

How can you tell a thought crime if you can't see thoughts?

JiggySpeak using grown up terms again, y'all. Whoop whoop the sound of the police!!!
08-07-2017 , 01:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Why are you policing speech by telling people to stop using their speech to police speech?

How can you tell a thought crime if you can't see thoughts?

JiggySpeak using grown up terms again, y'all. Whoop whoop the sound of the police!!!
I think I can sum up your entire posting history.

"What do words even mean?"

Quis iufi kn iiuoiuio kdfio nd ioua iu ouioiusd ernca mcoa.

Fuio rew aduio pofda oufdas ourouda rew.

Words man, words....
08-07-2017 , 01:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Go **** yourself! It's in the first 5 minutes. Refute it or concede. You're already wrong, so I don't care either way.
I'm not providing views to any youtube video you post here for obvious reasons. Go **** yourself. You have different standards for how people should treat each other because you don't want to seem like a racist by supporting business owners rights to call black employees ******s, but you're super happy to say employers shouldn't have to call their male employees he and female employees she, because that's an acceptable form of bigotry amongst your peers right now. In 20 years, your peers will think you saying men are men and women are women period is disgusting and you'll back off of it just like you have with saying what you REALLY want about black folk, and you'll replace it with some other offensive bull**** that your group pretends is ok for now.

You're ****ing sickening, and you do whatever you can get away with because you have this innate desire to show how much better you are than X because so long as there is an X beneath you, you can pretend you aren't the bottom rung on the ladder.

Go **** yourself
08-07-2017 , 01:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
I think I can sum up your entire posting history.



"What do words even mean?"



Quis iufi kn iiuoiuio kdfio nd ioua iu ouioiusd ernca mcoa.



Fuio rew aduio pofda oufdas ourouda rew.



Words man, words....


Comprehension trolling was dispelled early. You do appear to only have plenty of empty words about an array of content and members. But please go on thought police speech minder...
08-07-2017 , 01:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
I know you don't understand how things work...
Sure, I don't know how this alleged SJWer thingee works, if that's what you mean. You were supposed to be explaining it to all of us... remember.

So why don't we do a little review.

A while back you mentioned something about having "stood up" to "real" r-word-ism as something that you felt was relevant to this SJWer thingee. Since then I've asked you several times to clarify this comment. You have failed to do so.

So... at this point, I'd kinda like to know if you still feel this "stood up"-ness, and "real"-ness, are still in fact relevant. If not, just say the word, and I'll drop this shiz like one of Sabo's turds. If so... I really feel we need to go back, and chat this whole part out proper.

Let me know !!!1!

Last edited by Shame Trolly !!!1!; 08-07-2017 at 01:58 PM.
08-07-2017 , 01:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Yes, I'm sure Larry and Sergei are a bunch of Leftist/SJWers...
As you use your words, are "leftist" and "SJWer" synonyms? Is it possible to be a "Leftist", and not be a "SJWer"? AFAIK Page & Binger are garden variety Donkeys. This tells me that the way you use your words, that "Leftist" even includes centrist USians up to ~10% right of dead-center... and presumably excludes anti-capitalists like the TQIL-IRGPT.

So... am I correct... that the way you use your words is... Donkey == Leftist == SJWer ??

Quote:
... Do you think they single handedly do everything at Google?..
LOL no. Fool. They set policy at google.com, including this 'manifesto'. Fool.
08-07-2017 , 02:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
So... at this point, I'd kinda like to know if you still feel this "stood up"-ness, and "real"-ness, are still in fact relevant. If not, just say the word, and I'll drop this shiz like one of Sabo's turds. If so... I really feel we need to go back, and chat this whole part out proper.

Let me know !!!1!

Why are you back on this? You're the one who said you "organized" against racism, which you still haven't proven. That's the only thing I was referencing in doubting your claims.

So, how have you organized?
08-07-2017 , 02:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
As you use your words, are "leftist" and "SJWer" synonyms? Is it possible to be a "Leftist", and not be a "SJWer"? AFAIK Page & Binger are garden variety Donkeys. This tells me that the way you use your words, that "Leftist" even includes centrist USians up to ~10% right of dead-center... and presumably excludes anti-capitalists like the TQIL-IRGPT.

So... am I correct... that the way you use your words is... Donkey == Leftist == SJWer ??
No, I think you can be a Donkey and not be an SJW. A lot of those "Donkeys" are leaving the Democrat Party because the Left is no longer liberal:



Yes, I think that Larry and Sergei are closer to authoritarians than one should be comfortable with.


Quote:
LOL no. Fool. They set policy at google.com, including this 'manifesto'. Fool.
Hahahaha! Are you suggesting that they signed off on this? I think this person was more of a rogue agent. I think that that Larry and Sergei are much more aligned with the VP of Diversity's response - Danielle Brown.

      
m