Yes I did. I'm working on an article about it. No, it doesn't point to him being innocent. Malkin is getting her information from the family and a guy named Brian Bates, who was an investigator for the defense.

Most of what Malkin brings up in her special is not mentioned at all in Holtzclaw's appeal. Her arguments are mostly nonsense.

https://twitter.com/cuteangel_fb/sta...61142744186880

fantastic breakdown of the psychology in the SJW's and how these philosophies have played out in recent history. also shows how these failed ideologies have been re-branded

these aren't bigots. these are Dr's and this is their area of expertise. They articulate what is going on with incredible depth

Or, you could learn about fighting from civil rights from one of the greats of all time, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/k...irmingham-jail

Pretty interesting that J Peterson, one of the biggest critics of social justice warriors studied authoritarian regimes for decades. Let that sink in.

Or you could listen to both? J Peterson is a very sharp guy you might just learn something. J Peterson is probably more relevant when discussing todays political climate which was very different to the one MLK was brought up in. Thankfully we have come a long way since then.

MLK probably wouldnt have liked to SJW movement he always implored us to judge people on the content of their character not the color of their skin.

Oh today's political climate is VERY similar to the 1960's civil rights movement. You have a political movement (Republicans) that are entirely built on taking away the rights of minorities. You have a huge mass incarceration problem where black Americans are being locked up far more often than white people and for far longer when they commit the same crimes. You have states attacking voting rights harshly like North Carolina, Alabama, Georgia, and many others that are trying to make it difficult for black and poor people to vote in their states. You have attacks on LGBT and transgender rights both through the states and the federal government now with Jeff Sessions in charge.

I can't think of a recent time in history when MLK's words were more relevant, actually.

Acronymal stereotypes seem a lower priority than an authoritarian regime that erases science and fancies stuff like genetic supremacy.

I 100% agree with the bit in bold. The authoritarian SJWs as well as the alt right white nationalist would do well to heed that advice.

And yes there are massive problems in the US at the moment but your country has come a long way since then. Black people couldnt vote back then , you have had a black man as president , the two climates arent similar but black communities are still feeling the effects of being treated as second class citizens for over a century.

"Authoritarian SJWs" is an impressive bit of Orwellian Doublespeak, you must be proud of that bit of strange propaganda.

Oh, those darn authoritarians, the SJWs, demanding criminal justice reform and an end to mass incarceration. What a bunch of authori-oh wait.


https://twitter.com/BrennanCenter/st...02466668445696

Im all in favor of reforming your justice system , its barbaric for a country that prides its self on its freedom. I am not in favor of stifling free speech and other peoples opinions. It doesnt do the left any favors in fact it weakens the left and paves the way for goons like Trump.

I take no pride in pointing out facts. Your university's are over run with the authoritarian left. I am a fan of neither the authoritarian left or the authoritarian right, they are two cheeks of the same arse.

That acronym....

1. Isn't used in a way that is honest or complete to words in the acronym. It's used as a false representation of the words Social, Justice, and Warrior.

2. Is being invoked in a guise of academia.

3. Is 2 'moves' away from being Jews.

4. While all sorts of ists, isms, nazis, gots, and phobes are prowling around in the halls of institutions and authorities.

5. Is deceptively easy to share. SJWs.

https://twitter.com/Taniel/status/840444472626425856

Your evidence of this authoritarianism so far has been a radical Christian pro-life website referencing an incident in which an anonymous teacher allegedly lost his job at an unnamed private school.

Let that sink in.

No iv given countless examples of authoritarianism creeping into our society's both in government policy and in University's in countries all over the world.

The most recent example I saw was a Ryerston university student who wanted write a paper on why the wage gap was a myth was told by her professor that she shouldn't use government or business sources and only to use feminist sources. He or she is pushing their ideology onto students and discouraging free thought.

It would be different is she was told to check out a number of sources including feminist ones. Its practically indoctrination.

http://www.torontosun.com/2017/03/09...inist-journals

Countless examples is easy when I never see anything like a retraction. That's always the game. The conversation we were having was about the claim that you can't even ask where someone's from any more, and somehow that involved leaping onto a horrendously shoddy article about something unrelated, and now we turn down another avenue.

So we have part of a letter without context in which an instructor tells a student that if they want to write about the wage gap then they'll find a wealth of information in feminist writings. You realise the student could, I don't know, critique those sources if they wanted? Write their essay based on the research into the area and not whatever they were trying to use.

I have little reason to think that's legit, but it doesn't really strike me as "authoritarian" for a teacher to direct someone to the research on what they want to write about.

Well its true micro aggression's are not only a way to limit peoples speech but also trying to limit the way they think.

Its also encouraging people to act like victims and see aggression's everywhere in everyday language. Its not helpful imo and is another example of the authoritarian left im talking about.

She was told that her entire premise was wrong , she was told pretty much that if she wanted to write about it she had to say it was real and not use business sources and write about it from a feminist perspective despite the fact that it is a hotly debated topic and the theory has many holes in it.

I dont know why you find it so hard to believe Universitys are awash with PC nonsense these days I think it is very plausible given how much they like to dictate the words people use to speakers they are allowed to hear.

Imagine my shock and horror at the fact that the teacher wanted the student to use real, academic sources and not "business sources" (think tank lobbying bullshit) that showed a lot of false results.

Slow down again. That microaggressions are even being "enforced" so to speak with any kind of punishment is exactly the thing you were supposed to be trying to evidence, except all I got was a claim about a university you then couldn't find, and a pro-life website with no details.

This is how we end up with you thinking you've given me "countless examples" and I'm scratching my head wondering when.

You don't now get to assert that your feelings about microaggressions are clearly true.

So, for clarity, are you retracting the previous "countless examples" or are we just pretending that they happened? Because I don't agree to the latter, and it seems unfair for me to have to deal with more inane **** when you haven't thought about the first layer.

Maybe the student's premise was completely flawed? How the **** am I supposed to know when I haven't even got an essay title? Again, an instructor telling a student that the best source for info on the wage gap is actual research on the wage gap is not some bizarre overreach. It didn't say the student couldn't write whatever they wanted based on that info. Although, using bullshit sources and writing bullshit essays is not that likely to end well for a student, granted.

This post perfectly describes our political climate, imo

Dead right about the justice system but the evidence for a problem of the authoritarian left in 'the real world' of ideas and education does seem very thin. It's a much bigger problem on-line where a few can dominate - Owen Jones who's turning into a bit of a hero imo has announced he is cutting back on social media because of it. The problem is coming from the left and the right.

https://www.facebook.com/owenjones84...83629501730559

The challenge of accounting for front motives is that front motives don't want to be identified outside the front.

So, you front'n?

I hope this guy is right and it happens before the West entirely collapses.