no it seems that you cant read. you have simply made up things in both threads.

you straight up made up that ppl "forced" this guy to do anything. no one did. the university moved the event on their own volition. the guy apologized on his own volition due to criticism.

you straight up made up this

as this was never said in either of the links you provided.

ya see, me, im not that smart. I just stick to facts and simple logic. thats easy. you, however, to support your deluded worldview, must constantly lie and distort and omit and strawman. thats hard work Im sure. I would not be able to do it, thats for sure.

This is not indicative of what's actually been happening. Do I really have to link videos of how they disrup his speeches? Really?

Whose speeches, do you know who we are talking about Wil?

dude, we were talking about the link that lord provided about some professor who's speech was cancelled. the protest didnt even happen.

and regardless, there are thousands of protests that are peaceful not disruptive. the vast majority are. you just dont hear about them.

wil is really hard to talk to. he needs to be constantly spoon-fed precise context are he cant keep track of whats going on. I cant tell if its intentional or he has some sort of disability.

Why do you think he got exiled?

For this and several other posts. Final warning in this thread Victor. Any questions or complaints about this - take them to a moderation thread.


Just in case it wasn't clear last time. You cannot bring your 'modding' to content threads and you cannot bring forum noise to content threads. This applies to all content threads and is your final warning. There is no leeway on either of these.


Wil, if you need to respond to non-content posts then can you take it to one of the !!! threads please

Chez, that wasn't even an insult. It's absurd to warn Victor for that. You wouldn't get a warning for that in OOT, SE or literally any other forum on 2p2. This looks like nothing more than a defense of Wil, who you didn't warn for calling others "******s" lately. Chezland, in a nutshell. Stormfront, but most of the posters can beat .05/.10.

There were several offending posts but if you want to discuss, or gripe about, moderation decisions or the forum then take it to the moderation thread - keep it out of content threads.

sjws at the wall street journal are purging writers with different opinions https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...ournal/516318/

murdoch papers need to be a safe space where youre shielded from harmful opinions

This is 1st on the list of quick examples to highlight this facet.

Mother****er just stop.

You refuse to address this point:

Where in the **** was the microphone and podium and stage space for the arguer to make their argument against Milo?

There's a huge blind spot you guys have, and it's that if Milo or any of the other deplorable pseudointellectuals were having actual debates in front of crowds, or actual townhall style forums, the majority of the protestors would be instead lining up around the block to either see the Milos get clowned or clown them themselves. But they don't, and 1 thing I'll give Milo specifically is that he's smart enough to realize this. He could arrange debates and townhalls to his heart's content but he won't, especially now, because his clowning would be 2fold, where not only would he get clowned for his ideas but his new schtick with complaining about the protesters would look extremely foolish.

Consider this scenario: I go to a Milo speech, as in, buy a ticket and sit in the actual auditorium, with a pignose, and when the speech starts I go on stage and enter a debate/argument with him.

1. What do you think would happen?

2. What do you think should happen?



p.s. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pignose

p.p.s. 'mother****er' is a term of endearment

I have a very short list of 2p2ers who, when they make a contrary reply to another poster, I know devoid of all context that original poster has made some serious missteps and wrong turns somewhere.

th14 is on that list.

None of that would matter, even if it were true. Speakers are allowed to speak and audiences are allowed to come listen in a free and liberal society. You are arguing against this, because you are not liberal.

You don't know what you're talking about anyway. All of these conservative speakers who get shouted down by your illiberal friends, fire alarms pulled, violent protests, the hecklers veto.... Milo, Shapiro, et al, they all typically have question answer sessions, and they do debates as well. Do you even youtoob?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0M1huX3d75Y
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=o060w7URvAw

You really went there huh?

Notice that lord never answers these questions.

But anyhow,


Or just state you refuse to explore this topic and I'll scram as otherwise there's not enough !pizza! in the world for me to suffer this foolishness.


p.s. Because intellectual laziness knows no bounds, potentially, a pignose is not some sort of snubnose gun, it's a very powerful portable amplifier you can hook to your belt or wherever.

Those questions get to the crux of everything, not so coincidentally.

God bless 'em for trying to learn new stuff but the heckler's veto is not exactly a 'real' thing.

5ive don't bring post in from !!! threads that can in anyway break the rules or to make it about posters. Final warning and this applies to all content threads.

lord knows i'm trying

None of it matters, as I said. They are allowed to give speeches with or without answering questions if they want, and those groups who invited them are allowed to listen. They can do debates, which they have. Other groups can have other speakers, which they do. This is all consistent with the free exchange of ideas.

Taking this even further--what academic discipline are the Milos of the world exploring? What research are they doing? How are they adding to human knowledge? What business do they have at a university?

As are protests

I agree!

Lol, they are arguing against many of the social justice concepts you hold dear. This is something you should welcome, because if your ideals can't stand up to criticisms of a troll like Milo, good luck having them accepted by the greater public. What business does he have at a university? He was invited by a university sanctioned group of Republicans.

I expect all of these answers would come quickly to you if the roles were reversed and a group of authoritarian Christians were shouting down a feminist pro-abortion speaker.