Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
On the contrary. My position is to argue more, not less. I've been criticising those who advocate not arguing, but instead advocate shouting down and trying to prevent argument.
Mother****er just stop.
You refuse to address this point:
Where in the **** was the microphone and podium and stage space for the arguer to make their argument against Milo?
There's a huge blind spot you guys have, and it's that if Milo or any of the other deplorable pseudointellectuals were having actual debates in front of crowds, or actual townhall style forums, the majority of the protestors would be instead lining up around the block to either see the Milos get clowned or clown them themselves. But they don't, and 1 thing I'll give Milo specifically is that he's smart enough to realize this. He could arrange debates and townhalls to his heart's content but he won't, especially now, because his clowning would be 2fold, where not only would he get clowned for his ideas but his new schtick with complaining about the protesters would look extremely foolish.
Consider this scenario: I go to a Milo speech, as in, buy a ticket and sit in the actual auditorium, with a pignose, and when the speech starts I go on stage and enter a debate/argument with him.
1. What do you think would happen?
2. What do you think should happen?
p.s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pignose
p.p.s. 'mother****er' is a term of endearment