Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Sexism: or, Feminism Poisons Everything and A Voice for Men Sexism: or, Feminism Poisons Everything and A Voice for Men

09-22-2014 , 12:05 AM
Oh, thanks to the magic that is gifyoutube, I'm so making that dr kelso vs dr reid gif a thing some time when I remember to
09-22-2014 , 12:30 AM
so your reading comprehension sucks.

good talk.
09-22-2014 , 12:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
Yet another verbal altercation involving LK and a lightweight troll that, if made physical, would resemble geriatric MMA.
if you're calling me the troll and not LK, you're doing it wrong.
09-22-2014 , 02:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by airwave16
so your reading comprehension sucks.

good talk.
Nope, try again
09-22-2014 , 02:32 AM
horse**** lk, horse****
09-22-2014 , 02:36 AM
09-23-2014 , 08:50 AM
Great paper on why we act the way we do when looking for a partner. Womens hypergami and mens affinity to stay in rural areas.

Its called Sex and the city and is written by Lena Edlund, Columbia University.

http://jagiellonia.econ.columbia.edu/~le93/sexinc.pdf
09-23-2014 , 12:04 PM
Reminder to L.K that he is to read this paper.

http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism...sposable-male/

Advice when reading would be to remove those racist finder goggles since this has nothing to do with race. If you want to compare the mens will to switch situation with a black slave woman you should probably compare her to a black slave man and not the king of Norway.
09-23-2014 , 12:12 PM
Lol I read A Voice for Men article yesterday claiming women shouldn't take gaming's sexism personally because gamers like to abuse everyone so they aren't doing it to target women specifically.
09-23-2014 , 12:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sputnik3000
Reminder to L.K that he is to read this paper.

http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism...sposable-male/

Advice when reading would be to remove those racist finder goggles since this has nothing to do with race. If you want to compare the mens will to switch situation with a black slave woman you should probably compare her to a black slave man and not the king of Norway.
do you not know what an analogy is, you potato with eyes?

God you're stupid.
09-23-2014 , 12:23 PM
anyway, no big shocks sputty is claiming mental feebleness as an excuse to avoid discussing any issues from his beloved hate site
09-23-2014 , 12:35 PM
Man, kinda upset the OOT thread about this stuff was closed, because the arguments the dolts were making were so bad it was pretty entertaining watching them get destroyed.

Starting to feel like sputnik's misogyny is getting to "probably should jsut be banned for bigotry like Silver_Man" levels.
09-23-2014 , 12:37 PM
just to be safe, should probably get rid of his biggest fan and imitator, mark23456 or whatever forgettable name it is
09-23-2014 , 12:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sputnik3000
Reminder to L.K that he is to read this paper.

http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism...sposable-male/

Advice when reading would be to remove those racist finder goggles since this has nothing to do with race. If you want to compare the mens will to switch situation with a black slave woman you should probably compare her to a black slave man and not the king of Norway.
youtoobz aren't "papers."
09-23-2014 , 12:55 PM
that's the thing about the illogical followers of hateful belief systems: they don't want to even acknowledge that they could be wrong and will desperately cling to anything, even poorly made and completely unsourced youtube videos, to support their biases and cognitive dissonance.
09-23-2014 , 01:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sputnik3000
Reminder to L.K that he is to read this paper.

http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism...sposable-male/

Advice when reading would be to remove those racist finder goggles since this has nothing to do with race. If you want to compare the mens will to switch situation with a black slave woman you should probably compare her to a black slave man and not the king of Norway.
Oh, and this thread, as usual, produced another gem from sputty that's a pretty good response when he asks others to do some reading:

Quote:
Originally Posted by sputnik3000
Im working on it. Its just that your behaviour keeps nudging your assignment in the wrong direction on my to do list. A hint would be to not be so emotional and then maybe i will deem you worthy of my time.
09-23-2014 , 01:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sputnik3000
Womens hypergami and mens affinity to stay in rural areas.
'Hypergamy' I've heard of. 'Men's affinity to stay in rural areas' is a new and somewhat bizarre one on me.
09-23-2014 , 01:24 PM
As for:

Quote:
remove those racist finder goggles
I guess that means "brain." I didn't notice anything racist in the youtoob you linked, but there's definitely a correlation between some of these"men's rights" sites and racism.
09-23-2014 , 01:26 PM
Sputty doesn't understand what an analogy is. So when I compared two similar things, all he could do is assume I meant they are the same. It's all his pea-sized brain can manage.
09-23-2014 , 01:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anais
Sputty doesn't understand what an analogy is. So when I compared two similar things, all he could do is assume I meant they are the same. It's all his pea-sized brain can manage.

Quote:
Not even blatant racists are stupid enough to make the argument that white people would gladly change places with black slaves because of the financial security aspect.
Do you believe thats a good answer? Would a black upper class woman gladly switch places with a white male blue collar worker? When you are reading you need to look at men and women from the same conditions. Think class not race.
09-23-2014 , 02:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by All-In Flynn
'Hypergamy' I've heard of. 'Men's affinity to stay in rural areas' is a new and somewhat bizarre one on me.
Quote:
Young women outnumber young men in urban areas throughout the Western
world. Assuming that cities offer better labor markets for skilled workers,
urban areas should attract skilled workers of both sexes. However, this
explanation alone would predict a counterfactual surplus of men in urban
areas. This paper has argued that the key to this puzzle may lie in asymme-
tries in the marriage market. In particular, men pay women for marriage.
Thus, urban areas may offer women not only a better job market, but also a
better marriage market, i.e., men with higher incomes. Swedish municipality-
level data for the ages 25–34 ad 35–44 are consistent with the second
explanation. High male incomes are associated with more women for both
age groups, but more so for the younger age group, consistent with the
hypothesis that younger women are particularly prized.
While men out-earn women at all ages, judging by the sex ratios, young
women aged 25–44 live in richer municipalities. Whether this means that women also enjoy higher consumption than men in that age group remains
unclear, but the findings are suggestive of the importance of partnering and
marriage in equalizing male and female consumption.
A surplus of women in cities may be a geographic manifestation of the
general phenomenon of hypergyny, that is, women’s marrying ‘‘up’’.
I should have phrased it unskilled mens affinity. As in men that arent doing skilled labour are better staying rural where they actually have some value. In urban areas they are just one of many but in rural areas they are more special and therefor have a higher chance of attracting a woman.
09-23-2014 , 02:18 PM
Alobar is just another SJW trying to shut down the brave soldiers exposing the truth
09-23-2014 , 02:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sputnik3000
Do you believe thats a good answer? Would a black upper class woman gladly switch places with a white male blue collar worker? When you are reading you need to look at men and women from the same conditions. Think class not race.
09-23-2014 , 02:55 PM
But more to your own moronic point: the author is saying men in the dominant class would LOVE to change places with women, who are all considered a lower class. So even by your own statement you disagree with the assertions made in a piece you claim you think is great.

Starting to wonder if you actually read it.
09-23-2014 , 03:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anais
But more to your own moronic point: the author is saying men in the dominant class would LOVE to change places with women, who are all considered a lower class. So even by your own statement you disagree with the assertions made in a piece you claim you think is great
I must have missed that part so can you please provide a quote

      
m