I'm fairly sure cwoc is insane. I've never read a post if his that made the slightest bit of sense.

It says you would be better if you were more homosexual so it's implicit. Here's the next bit.

"The homosexualisation of male culture is, quite obviously, in the public interest. Where are the politicians with the guts to say so?"

The alternative and far more likely explanation is that you are not educated enough to understand them.

It could be interpreted as saying people would be better off not being so extreme in their masculinity. An argument for moderation, not an argument for homosexual superiority in the slightest.

But it's a pretty moot point anyway. There are gay men who are extremely masculine, and straight men who possess feminine qualities. It's all just an incoherent mess at this point that means nothing.

The distinction is made quite clearly.

"As well as being mostly young, poor, uneducated and unemployed, violent criminals are overwhelmingly heterosexual. Although not all straight men are thugs, nearly all thugs are straight........So why are straight males different? "

There's also a long history of marginalizing raving idiots and bigots as well

Is that from personal experience troll ?

No. Why does that even matter?

There's absolutely no way you are better educated than me. Why would you, as a black Muslim, even want an education like I, a white Jew, got? Racist.

I skipped a year at school due to academic excellence and went to two top universities. I did a third degree for fun in my spare time. I regard you as ill-read, ill-educated and intellectually inferior.

PS I am not a Muslim as well you know. You have been told often enough.

Cwoc meme #2 IMO

Wow, you can make up any old nonsense and claim its true online. Fun!

Amazing.

he also saved kittens and an elderly widow from a burning building while learning mandarin Chinese. Don't you tell him what's what.

Meh, not impressed. I wouldn't say this qualifies as better educated than me. That you think you're actually more intelligent than me is cute, though.

Whoa! We got a henry17 over here!!


Do you also have frosted tips? How do you feel about traveling friends staying at your place?

There is little insight or intelligence in any of your posts that I have come across. Your "formal debate" was pitiful. Please direct me to your best efforts just in case I've misjudged you. I am happy to give credit where it is due.

So you DO want marriage between homosexuals to legally be called "gay marriage"

un ****ing real.

Also lol at equating granting homosexuals equal rights and standing in the eyes of the law as being homophobic, but demanding that they have their own separate word for their unions isnt. Well played.

why don't we have a real opponent yet? are they all banned? if so. please tell me because i want them in this thread.

I'm sure cwoc would help out more, but he's probably busy earning 9 PhDs at once or something

Just because you can't or won't recognize it doesn't mean it isn't there. I'm sure that nearly everyone else who reads my posts disagrees with you. But then again, when doesn't everyone disagree with you?

They're scared, I guess. Doggg said some garbage excuse, something about God not wanting him to argue anymore (though he's still posting and arguing) and seeming to not trust that he won't get banned. festeringZit hasn't been here in over a month. I don't know if anyone personally showed Aaron W (wow, member #31!!) to this thread. raradevils was arguing in the thread in the real politics forum, but hasn't done so in 3 days. BTIrish hasn't posted at all in months.

I'm not sure who else we're missing. I guess Aaron W would be the only one left to try, though off-hand I don't recall if he's actually anti-gay marriage.

I know this is off topic, but its a fair Q since you brought it up: what are your degrees in?

On topic: what do you consider different about a secular marriage for a same sex couple vs a heterosexual couple that it requires a different label? The marriage itself, not the couple.

Where is it ? You seem unwilling to direct me to a single post. I will look at it in an unjaundiced way but I suspect that my standards are higher than yours.