Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Rail on spineless, ******ed liberals with no principles ITT Rail on spineless, ******ed liberals with no principles ITT

06-16-2013 , 01:51 PM
Petition to change the title of this thread to...

Rail on spineless, ******ed LirvA with no principles ITT.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Omar Comin
You aint his momma
Gizmo didn't make this up. It's hard enough for people with clinical ******ation to make it in life... they don't need us "norms" demonizing them for our own LOLZ. See R-word.org.

I'll admit that throwing around the r-word is a hard habit to break, however (see my thread title suggestion above, LOL).
06-16-2013 , 02:00 PM
Lirva you are not an anarchist.. stop using that word
06-16-2013 , 05:08 PM
That's why tard is such a great derivative word. When you use tard you can technically say you are not using the word ******. Another trick is to abuse the word petard when saying ******ed. Petarded gets the point across and again not technically using the word ******ed. LOL words.
06-16-2013 , 05:15 PM
Now spineless on the other-hand is a clear slur against those without spines. Why the lack of vertebrae hate? People without spines may not get firm support and are not usually upright citizens, but those unable to stand up for themself should recieve at least basic compassion from a community in an advanced society.
06-16-2013 , 05:22 PM
Oh wait, Librals...progressives, people who like advancement. Cannot play the advanced society card it seems because we hate progress or we hate having an ample and fulfilling amount of something something. It seems the hate of librools is being liberally applied with words like spineless and perturbarded. Libirally hating liberuls it not logiclalalalal. The correct move is to conservatively hate libreals and that way keep hands totally clean from any libryl ideas.
06-16-2013 , 06:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissileDog
Gizmo didn't make this up. It's hard enough for people with clinical ******ation to make it in life... they don't need us "norms" demonizing them for our own LOLZ. See R-word.org.
I never know how exactly to feel about this stuff. It's so well-intentioned and so completely futile. There will always be a pejorative meaning 'unintelligent' and whatever official term is adopted will always be co-opted for that purpose. 'Imbecile', 'moron', 'cretin' - these were all, at one time or another, clinical terms. Even 'idiot' was a medical term. And I'd bet 'special needs' is a big hit in the playground these days.

My Left Foot was a big film when I was a kid. And how did we react to this inspirational tale of struggle against and success in spite of crippling cerebral palsy? We started referring to anyone who was obviously disabled as 'a Christy'. Anyone who did or said something dumb was called a Christy.

The only hope (and it's a razor-thin one) is tackling the underlying attitudes. Fussing over the specific words is just sweeping leaves on a windy day.
06-16-2013 , 06:39 PM
Just ordered my free ObamaCare sticker!
06-16-2013 , 07:23 PM
Same.
06-16-2013 , 09:03 PM
Interesting the lack of disdain for the r word in rivermans thread...
06-16-2013 , 09:28 PM
I'm actually not too familiar with river man. I don't read much of politics. I am, however much more acquainted with lirva. Who I have seen rail hard against using homophobic slurs while at the same time using sexist slurs as well as the word ******ed slung around as an insult.
06-16-2013 , 09:33 PM
You are missing out on FRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE MOOOOOOOONNNEEEEYYYYYYYYYY imo.
06-16-2013 , 09:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjoefish
Same.
Wanna rub them on each other?
06-17-2013 , 12:58 AM
Absolutely.
06-17-2013 , 12:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gizmo
I'm actually not too familiar with river man. I don't read much of politics. I am, however much more acquainted with lirva. Who I have seen rail hard against using homophobic slurs while at the same time using sexist slurs as well as the word ******ed slung around as an insult.

I seem to remember a certain female poster criticising male posters for being misogynist, while admitting she hates men herself.

Hi Gizmomo

06-17-2013 , 12:13 PM
Well, this thread kinda backfired.
06-17-2013 , 12:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LirvA
I seem to remember a certain female poster criticising male posters for being misogynist, while admitting she hates men herself.

Hi Gizmomo

Citation needed. Unless you're referring to me joking about it or are relying on elrey's take on my position to form your own.
06-17-2013 , 12:25 PM
To be fair, EVERYONE hates David Sklansky.
06-17-2013 , 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LirvA
I seem to remember a certain female poster criticising male posters for being misogynist, while admitting she hates men herself.

Hi Gizmomo

06-17-2013 , 12:39 PM
That's fantastic.
06-17-2013 , 02:21 PM
Liberalism is the lesser of the 2 evils.
06-17-2013 , 04:26 PM
Lirva you cannot prove in any way shape or form that anyone innocent ever died in a drone attack.....
06-17-2013 , 04:30 PM
LOL

Obama owns Lirva with Shrodinger's cat.
06-17-2013 , 04:35 PM
Most cats own lirva, because he refuses to break their natural rights of non-aggression

Spoiler:
06-17-2013 , 06:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gizmo
Citation needed. Unless you're referring to me joking about it or are relying on elrey's take on my position to form your own.

Spoiler:

Quote:
Sure, elrey, I hate men.

What's your point?
http://www.omgomgomg.org/viewtopic.p...ate+men#p30589
06-17-2013 , 06:31 PM
So this thread is about Godwin's law and LirvA and Giz poking each other in the eye?

      
m