Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Racial Discrimination (previously Mat: Its time for a conservative forum) Racial Discrimination (previously Mat: Its time for a conservative forum)

05-29-2017 , 07:01 PM
I'll give you an example Foldn, is it really a coincidence that you saw everyone using the phrase "JAQing off" and, without knowing what it meant, thought "Ooooh, I do that all the time"?

I'm just asking the question.
05-29-2017 , 07:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoQuarter
...



Dont people call you racist round these parts?

Weird



...
Yeah, and it's ****ing HI-larious.
05-29-2017 , 07:04 PM
FoldN not 100% sure racism exists, but is convinced professors are being discriminated against just for maybe asking innocent questions.
05-29-2017 , 07:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
... they are immediately accused of JAQing off, racism, being conservative (same thing) etc. etc. This is demonstrated in this very thread...
OK VG.

So, what particular rules do you propose be used to combat the above? What needs to be changed in order to make a forum more conservative friendly?

In order to make a forum more friendly to conservatives, should there be rules that certain requirements must be met, requirements that cannot be met in an immediate manner, in order to accuse a poster of JAQing off, etc? Are you thinking that an accuser has got to wait, say 24 hours, before making such an accusation ??
05-29-2017 , 07:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbrochu
FoldN not 100% sure racism exists, but is convinced professors are being discriminated against just for maybe asking innocent questions.
Maybe they are. How do we know they aren't? Can you prove it's never happened? Could it ever happen?

I don't know, but these questions need answering.
05-29-2017 , 07:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbrochu
FoldN, from St Louis, believes it's theoretically possible that there might be at least a tiny little smidgen of racism still out in the wild. But needs more evidence.
The evidence-backed conclusion that racism probably exists in the hiring market is apparently a "social justice crusade."
05-29-2017 , 07:16 PM
Look at this f**kface still crying.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Funny how he doesn't run off the bad leftist posters though isn't it?
05-29-2017 , 07:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladesman87
Maybe they are. How do we know they aren't? Can you prove it's never happened? Could it ever happen?

I don't know, but these questions need answering.
Is this an example of JAQ'n off or Shouting Down?
05-29-2017 , 07:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The REAL Trolly
The evidence-backed conclusion that racism probably exists in the hiring market is apparently a "social justice crusade."
Wait a minute mister, the word evidence is a little strong. I would prefer sneaking suspicion, or maybe doubtful supposition.
05-29-2017 , 07:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoQuarter
...



Whats this "dunk" bs? Why do you nerd mellenials need to come up with new words for everything?



...

I've never seen somebody so racist they found a way to not know what a 'slam dunk' in the sport of 'basketball' is.

Anyhow:

05-29-2017 , 07:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive
I've never seen somebody so racist they found a way to not know what a 'slam dunk' in the sport of 'basketball' is.

Anyhow:



05-29-2017 , 07:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbrochu
Is this an example of JAQ'n off or Shouting Down?
Now, now you 'leftists'.

How come nobody takes our conservative friends seriously here? What you should be doing is politely asking our conservative friends what changes need to be made to make a forum more friendly to their fellow conservatives. Nobody wants an 'echo chamber' after all... amirite?

So, maybe a good place to start might be examining the rules over in Alta. Since our conservative friends seem to universally feel that Alta is quite biased against conservatives like themselves, what rules over there would need to go in order to correct for this bias?
  1. Is the "Attack the argument, not the arguer" rule biased against conservatives?
  2. Is the "Don't be a troll" rule biased against conservatives?
  3. Is the "reputable citation" rule biased against conservatives?
  4. Is the "No broad-brush attacks" rule biased against conservatives?
  5. Is the no whining about moderation rule biased against conservatives?
  6. Is the "Keep posts substantive" rule biased against conservatives?

Last edited by Shame Trolly !!!1!; 05-29-2017 at 07:59 PM.
05-29-2017 , 07:48 PM
Where does he find this bull****?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
Here's a better article outlining the way "blasphemy" laws are beginning to take hold on some campuses. http://heterodoxacademy.org/2017/05/...ks-witch-hunt/

I think comments like the above are good indications of the demented thought processes that lead to the sort of brainwashing that has been going on for sometime in the social justice community.
05-29-2017 , 08:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive
Look at this f**kface still crying.
Still not over your meltdown yet, I see. Must have really hurt, huh.
05-29-2017 , 08:04 PM
You mean your meltdown in the ATF thread?
05-29-2017 , 08:04 PM
You're not a good troll, BS. You have cried way too much in the past few months lol.
05-29-2017 , 08:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by well named
I have seen (from various people) complaints that chez approves of or allows all of that sort of stuff but the complaints don't really line up very well with what I've actually seen from him since he took over the forum. I'm sure there's things I've missed, and I'm sure there's things where he took longer to take action on things than some people wanted, but my impression has been that a lot of the complaints about chez as a moderator have their roots in older complaints about him as a poster.
One of the issues is that chez rather obsessively goes back and ninja-deletes posts (and complaints about deletions!) to disguise what happened. Like, today's ban of averageguy is a good example: without any comment from the mods, a string of posts gets deleted and a poster gets OTBC'd without any kind of comment from the mods. You have to admit, it's at least a little suspicious.
05-29-2017 , 08:08 PM
What sort of comment are you looking for?
05-29-2017 , 08:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The REAL Trolly
One of the issues is that chez rather obsessively goes back and ninja-deletes posts (and complaints about deletions!) to disguise what happened. Like, today's ban of averageguy is a good example: without any comment from the mods, a string of posts gets deleted and a poster gets OTBC'd without any kind of comment from the mods. You have to admit, it's at least a little suspicious.
Bingo.
05-29-2017 , 08:17 PM
friendly ones
05-29-2017 , 08:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by whosnext
What sort of comment are you looking for?
Like I asked in the moderation post, I would just like to know which cowardly mod/admin was responsible.
05-29-2017 , 08:39 PM
It was not chezlaw or me. Based upon that information, your inference of who it was will likely be correct.
05-29-2017 , 08:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomCowley
Have they ever run a resume study with stereotypical black names against stereotypical white trash names (Candy, Brandi, Bambi, etc) or idiotic misspelled white names?
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleCrumble
That's an excellent point actually.
Is it? What would this experiment tell us that is different from what we know now? Let's say "white trash" names received fewer call backs than black names, what would that mean to you?
05-29-2017 , 08:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by whosnext
What sort of comment are you looking for?
Some basic explanation for what's going on? You wouldn't find it odd if a poster were to just disappear with no explanation? Doesn't it help you guys as mods if posters know what kinds of things aren't acceptable?
05-29-2017 , 08:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The REAL Trolly
Some basic explanation for what's going on? You wouldn't find it odd if a poster were to just disappear with no explanation?
The admin who can't understand why we can't just get along with racists and bigots had a temper tantrum and nuked another poster for hurting his feelings.

      
m