So, the 19 year old university track student was denied entry into your country because he went to the same mosque as a suspected terrorist and you think this is OK? He was trying to enter into your country for a track meet, with many other student athletes. You think that dude shouldn't be let in? Really?

Don't know if it's been mentioned (sorry don't have much time so forced to grunch) but a report came out that of the 10 safest cities in America, 8/10 are over represented by illegal immigrants.

Granted, there's more to the argument against illegal immigration, but the whole they're raping our wives narrative needs to stop

AG Sessions Says DOJ to ‘Pull Back’ on Police Department Civil Rights Suits

Keep in mind that when Sessions says this, it means he wants things like the Ferguson DoJ report to never happen. He wants those kinds of abuses to continue and persist around the country.

What were the outcomes of these law suits? Thanks in advance.

From the linked article:

As for what those agreements look like, you'd have to research them on a case by case basis. This article outlines the settlement the DoJ was working on with the city of Ferguson:

The city council then shot it down and the DoJ sued, but the latest I can find (there may be newer updates available) is this article from roughly a month later which suggests Ferguson was getting ready to accept the deal in exchange for the DoJ dropping the suit.

This article from January reports on rumors of what the DoJ agreed on with the city of Baltimore (again, newer info may be available).


As for things like the Ferguson DoJ report, this RedState opinion article explains from a conservative perspective (that, in this instance, I agree with) what is important to take away from it. No one should be comfortable with the kind of policing that was taking place in Ferguson.

But not only will the Jeff Sessions DoJ no longer engage in such investigations and lawsuits - Jeff Sessions has not even read the Ferguson report (which did not stop him from attacking it anyway).

Your link to the outcomes didn't provide any info maybe it is my phone. Could you post some of the results here so we can discuss then? Thanks in advance.

I assume the quote I included about the DoJ agreement with Ferguson would help answer that, and here's a snippet from the Baltimore article about what their agreement entails:

From the DoJ's webpage, details on their agreement with Cleveland:

Again, these are three examples out of 19 agreements the DoJ had with city police forces at the end of Obama's term.

Just for the record, 1T in discounts is basically not in the same universe as 1T in gov't spending. He's using the 2 interchangeably when he talks about his 1T infrastructure plan

Trump lied to a grieving widow last night--there was no significant intel captured in the raid.

https://twitter.com/votevets/status/836949281458294785

Jeff Sessions lied in confirmation hearings

https://twitter.com/JuddLegum/status/837123554009354240

https://twitter.com/y72i4ee1/status/837124276155199488

Sessions lying about having contact with Russia during his confirmation hearings seems like a pretty bad strategy for dispelling all these Trump-Russia allegations.

From what I just read Sessions has a worse memory than stereotypical pot smokers.

Out of curiosity, if you were, say, an EMT in an ambulance and was first on the scene to a car accident and witnessed an awful, drawn out death happening to the victim in the car, when you meet that person's family are you the type of person to tell them there was no suffering and the death was instant, or tell them how awful it actually was?

Your point in this post, even if correct (not to mention it was set in motion during the Obama administration), eludes me.

https://twitter.com/igorvolsky/statu...30137296592897

The bigger question is not what will happen to Sessions, but WHY did he lie in the first place. Why not just say you talked to a Russian ambassador. He's trying to cover up something.

Man tweets about long list of people who've lied. Names 4 people. Got it.

lmao at this being a rebuttal. try harder.

POTUS just straight up lying to the widow of a dead solider is OK because, hey, it's in her best interest to not know the truth.

only thing dumber would be claiming FOUR (at LEAST four) nominees lying in confirmation hearings is not a long list by nominee standards...

oh wait. ok yep makes sense now.

Let's go through the actual situation. Let's say you are correct in the assessment that no good intelligence was gathered by the raid, and we lost a guy in the process. Who, actually, is to blame for that, and why does that somehow make a difference in the death that occurred? Especially so in terms of the widow?

The man was doing his ****ing job and he died in the process of it. It wasn't his call and I don't think a single person thinks anyone purposefully sent a special forces team on a raid simply to waste their time, correct?

So even if a mistake was made, and there's no way to tell if it even was a mistake, what good comes out of saying so? They made a decision and they went with it. Sometimes that doesn't work out, as anyone here who has ever had to make a hard call knows. You make the best decision you can at the time with the information available.

What good comes out of creating an atmosphere where the person's family feels as if they may have died in vain? It's downright insulting. The men fighting and putting their lives on the line do it without question and they are more than willing to carry out orders that are deemed necessary. You think they don't know that sometimes the results aren't optimal?

I really wonder about you people sometimes. Do you ever stop and think about these topics you spew about?

Should Trump have said "too bad your husband died for nothing, lol. Thanks Obama."?

I really question the motives for posts like yours. They never want to lose a guy like that and I'm sure there's some real heartache behind the scenes, by the people who made the call, over his death. Those men bleed country and people like you sit back and criticize like children after the fact. You'll pump your fist chanting USA when they take out Osama but when there's a mistake somewhere all you do is bitch.

You sitting here taking a cheap shot over it because you want to trash Trump is kind of despicable.

Stopping more troops from getting pointlessly to their deaths? Jesus ****ing Christ wil this is a nuclear hot take.

You are advocating for applying zero critical scrutiny to the operations of our military - the operation of which is perhaps the single greatest responsibility of the office of the presidency - lest we upset anyone's feelings. I could also point out that the president you support paraded Benghazi Mom on stage at the RNC but that's frankly boring in the face of how plainly stupid your logic is here.

Amazing. The level of ignorance here is stunning.

Even after knowing the story behind the bin laden raid, knowing the decision Obama faced and the circumstances behind it, you can say the above with a straight face? Really? Really?

We can only be happy that people like you aren't in charge of making tough decisions. Combined with your previous posts I think it gives good insight on the type of attitude you have towards everything.

zero arguments presented here so I guess we're done

"Benghazi Mom".

Jesus Christ. Have you people no respect at all for grieving families.

We weren't really discussing anything. I was informing you about something you were ignorant about. It wasn't a back and forth and I sure as hell wasn't considering your side of it. Lol @ Monday morning quarterbacking a special forces operation with data you have no idea about.

But hey, you get to spew your nonsensical opinion on the internet!

He needed to take responsibility in some way shape or form rather than farm the blame out onto others. That is how you lead. He makes the decision, he damn sure would take the credit, then he needs to say he made a poor choice on limited information.

I get people arrested based on my decisions and I have a say in their freedom and whether they go to prison, and I take ownership if something I did was based on lack of information and ended with a poor result, why shouldn't the president of the united states do it on matters much bigger than mine.