Hey bigot, I know you're intolerant of other people's religions, but do you know what makes a Jewish person a Jewish person?

https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/law-of-return

I'd tell you what religion I am and how many of its tenets I'm unaware of, but I'm afraid your bigotry and intolerance might cause you to commit a hate crime against me - better keep that close to the vest.

That's bull****. Your denial of race existing is childish willful blindness.

Calling a racist racist is racist.

And there it is, as if there were any doubt. Hey wil, you know why white supremacists/nationalists such as yourself are ****ing dumb as hell? Because they're all African Americans, and so are you! You're an African American. How? Humans originated in Africa, and you absolutely have African DNA, just like every other white supremacist/nationalist. Superior ****ing genes. Yeah, sure. Keep telling yourself that.

[ youtube ]True Romance Sicilian Scene[/ youtube ]

This is such a telling observation.

these are not facts that prove anything.

Article 1 talks about the value of slaves, yeah slaves are expensive whats the point
Article 2 is an opinion piece in the nyt with the opinion of 1 professor, the quote shows that theres alot of money in slavery but just asserts that slavery made USA powerful without any evidence
Article 3 seems to be good for my prespective? I don't see how that article shows the south benefited from slavery economically.

posting broad articles is also not debating in good faith, it forces me to read and interpret what argument you are making. why don't you argue against the points I'm making and cite specific passages to help your case

why are countries that practiced slavery worse off historically than those that didn't

why was the North far Richer than the south

race exists but the law should pretend it doesn't, thats the essence of liberalism

idk why you progressives moved from this idea that even people in the 1900s understood

Hey Bigot, you might want to look at the citations refuting this guy's work.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_E._Baptist

I've never seen a link in Wikipedia claiming "excessive citations". Wow!

You can learn a lot from a Bigot.

Such a epic film. Gotta talk to the king in the john.

And in case people think they are not kick ass.

citation please

A timeout from this forum is distinct from a ban from 2+2. We never, as far as I know, banned anyone from 2+2.

ACEG got a temp ban for flagrantly ignoring the timeout received for the link

There was a philosophical debate over whether that meant she got the ban for the link or for ignoring the timeout rule. I say the later.

The law can deal with actual people, not what you or I demand ideologically. That's progress from imposed ideological limits.

Why should the law pretend any realities don't exist?

We all know how you love to bet here, wilch.

Would you like to bet on this, escrowed with someone we both trust?

I think we can work out why someone who advocates punching small kids in the face and stop searching people about to enter toilets wouldn't want to join an antifa protest, you useless little prick.

because justice is blind

one nation, one people, one law. Treating people with different laws is the easiest way to create injustice and mess up your country

But the question isn't whether there should be different laws for different people.

The question is whether the singular law should be cognizant of peoples' differences.


Like mandating handicap ramps, for example.

how are handicap ramps relevant.

are women and minorities handicapped and inferior in your opinion?

its just not a relevant analogy, handicap parking/ramps stem from clearly identifiable problems that can be alleviated by those things w/o discriminating against any other group. This isn't the case when you try to tweak the law based on sex or race.

Careful.....remember that Google guy who wanted to be "cognizant of people's differences".

Can't we just treat people objectively? Why do we have to put our thumbs on scales? Egalitarianism is great - you should check it out.

are handicapped people inferior in yours?

the ramps are relevant because if the law did not see people for what they are, many people would be unfairly denied access to buildings


[1/2]

The point is, all handicapped people (with similar handicaps) are treated equally - all blind are treated the same, all those in wheelchairs are treated the same, etc... Regardless of their immutable characteristics of race and sex.