Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
President Trump President Trump

08-10-2017 , 11:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllCowsEatGrass
He's absolutely terrible. Don't know if I hope he stays or goes. More right wing stuff will go through with Pence as president imo.
I was talking about the chicken.
08-10-2017 , 11:17 PM
I was too.
08-10-2017 , 11:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466





Tired Of This
Done With That
Never Satisfied With Where I'm At
I Sit And Think
What To Do
Just A Mother****in' Bore
Without A Clue

Shot My Drugs
Drank My Booze
Tired Of Joy And Self Abuse
Eternally Jaded Through And Through
Just A Self Loathing Dick
Without A Clue

Oh
Bored To Death
I'm Just Bored To Tears
Same Old **** Just Different Day & Year
Killed Myself But That Got Boring Too
So Beyond The Point Where It's Not True

Far Beyond High
Dramatically Low
Eternal Stare As If I Care To Know
All Of This Struggle
All Of This Work
In The End You Die Like Some Moronic Jerk

Shot My Drugs
Drank My Booze
Tired Of Joy And Self Abuse
Eternally Jaded Through And Through
Just A Self Loathing ****
Without A Clue

Oh
Bored To Death
I'm Just Bored To Tears
Same Old **** Just Different Day & Year
Killed Myself But That Got Boring Too
So Beyond The Point Where It's Not True

The Colors I See Are All Bleeding
The Sound That Was Is Now Standing Still
I Wonder When It Was It All Faded
A Dullen Corpse That Cannot Be Killed

Oh
Bored To Death
I'm Just Bored To Tears
Same Old **** Just Different Day & Year
Killed Myself But That Got Boring Too
So Beyond The Point Where It's Not True
08-10-2017 , 11:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllCowsEatGrass
And very possibly a sock puppet.
A well paid sock puppet.
08-10-2017 , 11:26 PM
I doubt that, you've never even heard of Dwight Eisenhower. You're clearly the low tier.
08-10-2017 , 11:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllCowsEatGrass
I was too.
nicely done
08-11-2017 , 12:18 AM
08-11-2017 , 12:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllCowsEatGrass
I doubt that, you've never even heard of Dwight Eisenhower. You're clearly the low tier.
I have. I'm going to ask for a pay rise.
08-11-2017 , 12:50 AM
The internet, it does not fail to deliver:

08-11-2017 , 12:52 AM
Have you tried...#Covfefe?
08-11-2017 , 01:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by batair
Nihilist...


fmp
08-11-2017 , 01:25 AM
After a series of initial questions, respondents were asked whether Trump won the popular vote, whether millions of illegal immigrants voted, and how often voter fraud occurs. These questions evoke arguments frequently made by Trump and others about the integrity of the 2016 election.

Then the survey asked two questions about postponing the 2020 election.
  • If Donald Trump were to say that the 2020 presidential election should be postponed until the country can make sure that only eligible American citizens can vote, would you support or oppose postponing the election?
  • What if both Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress were to say that the 2020 presidential election should be postponed until the country can make sure that only eligible American citizens can vote? Would you support or oppose postponing the election?

Roughly half of Republicans believe Trump won the popular vote — and would support postponing the 2020 election.


www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/08/10/in-a-new-poll-half-of-republicans-say-they-would-support-postponing-the-2020-election-if-trump-proposed-it/
08-11-2017 , 01:36 AM
End elections for a bit because of a non existent threat and ignore and put their head in the sand to other attacks on our election. Yup.
08-11-2017 , 01:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut
After a series of initial questions, respondents were asked whether Trump won the popular vote, whether millions of illegal immigrants voted, and how often voter fraud occurs. These questions evoke arguments frequently made by Trump and others about the integrity of the 2016 election.

Then the survey asked two questions about postponing the 2020 election.
  • If Donald Trump were to say that the 2020 presidential election should be postponed until the country can make sure that only eligible American citizens can vote, would you support or oppose postponing the election?
  • What if both Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress were to say that the 2020 presidential election should be postponed until the country can make sure that only eligible American citizens can vote? Would you support or oppose postponing the election?

Roughly half of Republicans believe Trump won the popular vote and would support postponing the 2020 election.


www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/08/10/in-a-new-poll-half-of-republicans-say-they-would-support-postponing-the-2020-election-if-trump-proposed-it/
While they did source their postponement questions, they didn't source the questions. Release the questions or ****'em.
08-11-2017 , 02:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
The most widely read liberal/progressive magazine today was the direct successor of The Liberator--both founded by William Lloyd Garrison.
Hey, somebody better go tell the Liberator to get back in line. They're not towing the line on the Narrative.

A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC Hack:
https://www.thenation.com/article/a-...ack/?page=full

Quote:
There was no hack of the Democratic National Committee’s system on July 5 last year—not by the Russians, not by anyone else. Hard science now demonstrates it was a leak—a download executed locally with a memory key or a similarly portable data-storage device. In short, it was an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system. This casts serious doubt on the initial “hack,” as alleged, that led to the very consequential publication of a large store of documents on WikiLeaks last summer.

Forensic investigations of documents made public two weeks prior to the July 5 leak by the person or entity known as Guccifer 2.0 show that they were fraudulent: Before Guccifer posted them they were adulterated by cutting and pasting them into a blank template that had Russian as its default language. Guccifer took responsibility on June 15 for an intrusion the DNC reported on June 14 and professed to be a WikiLeaks source—claims essential to the official narrative implicating Russia in what was soon cast as an extensive hacking operation. To put the point simply, forensic science now devastates this narrative.
08-11-2017 , 03:31 AM
I wouldn't be that surprised if some people disingenuously pushed the russia hack theory. Possibly because they were confident of other unsavory relationships that might surface if the issue drew enough heat? Looks like we're going to find out.
08-11-2017 , 08:29 AM
JiggyPartisan
08-11-2017 , 09:52 AM
Miller is the regime's new minder for women. I await the Pauly Shore versions of what policy may be born.
08-11-2017 , 10:53 AM
The fun thing about olds and stupids trying to internet like Jiggy and wil here is that they aren't even good at ****posting because of their severe intellectual deficits.


It took wil like THREE POSTS to come up with "I saw it on Reddit, yeah Reddit, and no, I still don't have a link" about his "liberal parents force their children to be gay" story.

Did you see it on r/thathappened, moron?

And Jiggy, sweet sweet Jiggy, excitedly runs to post that INSANE Nation article from 2 days ago. Keeping in mind, just try to read that ****. It refutes itself through its own organization and rhetorical style, it reads like an unedited transcript of Sean Hannity being drunk, and culminates into nonsensical-tech speak about "layers" of metadata and a claim that 22 MB/sec internet doesn't exist.

But seriously Jiggy's quoted there is actually a block quote from a "report", here's how the article introduces it:


Quote:
We come now to a moment of great gravity.

There has been a long effort to counter the official narrative we now call “Russiagate.” This effort has so far focused on the key events noted above, leaving numerous others still to be addressed. Until recently, researchers undertaking this work faced critical shortcomings, and these are to be explained. But they have achieved significant new momentum in the past several weeks, and what they have done now yields very consequential fruit. Forensic investigators, intelligence analysts, system designers, program architects, and computer scientists of long experience and strongly credentialed are now producing evidence disproving the official version of key events last year. Their work is intricate and continues at a kinetic pace as we speak. But its certain results so far are two, simply stated, and freighted with implications:
This is a crazy person who very clearly does not have an editor.
08-11-2017 , 11:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
While they did source their postponement questions, they didn't source the questions. Release the questions or ****'em.
What the **** is Jiggy trying to say here, and also, Jiggy, would YOU support postponing 2020 they figure out what's going on with voter fraud?


Do you think voter fraud is widespread?

You just ****ing posted about ACORN(****ing ACORN!), son, this **** is about you. We laugh and laugh at how dumb and easily manipulated you are.
08-11-2017 , 06:51 PM
****posting? You had to self ban for 2 weeks out of shame last year.

You're the mastah at ****posting.
08-11-2017 , 07:11 PM
Real talk, it might be time to call DCFS.
08-11-2017 , 07:53 PM
And, I ain't even old. I'm 41 dickhead.
08-11-2017 , 08:27 PM
I haven't checked out Fox News lately. Do right wing commentators still defend Trump as a competent president?
08-11-2017 , 08:32 PM
He's, like, not Hillary, or something. And ZOMG Gorsuch.

      
m