President Trump - Page 495 - Politics version 7.0 -- Two Plus Two Poker Forums

Two Plus Two Forums Archived Forums Other Topics Politics version 7.0

President Trump

...

Page 495 of 562

First

295 395 445 475 485 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 505 515 545

Last

Page 495 of 562

First

295 395 445 475 485 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 505 515 545

Last

08-04-2017 , 10:11 AM

#12351

JiggyMac

old hand

Join Date: Apr 2014 Posts: 1,809

Quote:

Originally Posted by 13ball

Racist morons like Jiggy want to play the dictionary game to distract from their odious beliefs.

Dumb ****s like you are....well, just dumb ****s.

08-04-2017 , 10:15 AM

#12352

Iron Tamer

veteran

Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 2,971

you linked sharia blue?

08-04-2017 , 10:30 AM

#12353

Max Cut

Guest

Posts: n/a

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iron Tamer

you linked sharia blue?

Hahaha, look at you and that clever play on words. You've earned yourself a 10 T-buck bonus in this weeks T-stipend!

08-04-2017 , 10:37 AM

#12354

spanktehbadwookie

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 19,374

Quote:

Originally Posted by DoOrDoNot

I have made no accusations. Your definition of what bigotry is could very well be the textbook definition. I don't know because you're evading answering. What I said was that if your definition of it differs from mine, it's easy to see why we have disagreement about what constitutes it. How about this, I will give you what my definition is, and then ask if you agree with it or not, ok?

Bigotry is intolerance of other peoples opinions. Is that an agreeable definition?

I didn't evade answering. In fact, I responded consistently with what you have provided

08-04-2017 , 11:00 AM

#12355

DoOrDoNot

old hand

Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 1,763

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie

I didn't evade answering. In fact, I responded consistently with what you have provided

Yet I still don't know what you define as bigotry. How can this be?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Max Cut View Post
In English conversation I usually go with the English definitions, mate.

Sounds good to me. You agree with the following then?

Bigotry: intolerance of other peoples opinions.

Phobia: an extreme or irrational fear or aversion to something

Intolerance: unwillingness to accept views, beliefs, or behavior that differ from one's own.

Disagreement: lack of consensus or approval.

Still waiting for an answer to this as well.

08-04-2017 , 11:04 AM

#12356

Max Cut

Guest

Posts: n/a

off-topic/unrelated

When laying out an intricate trap, one must be careful to avoid self-ownage.

08-04-2017 , 11:06 AM

#12357

spanktehbadwookie

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 19,374

Quote:

Originally Posted by DoOrDoNot

Yet I still don't know what you define as bigotry. How can this be?

Still waiting for an answer to this as well.

You aren't taking implied "no" for an answer for your demands for answers. Why?

08-04-2017 , 11:17 AM

#12358

JiggyMac

old hand

Join Date: Apr 2014 Posts: 1,809

08-04-2017 , 11:31 AM

#12359

spanktehbadwookie

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 19,374

Surprise Obama, again.

08-04-2017 , 11:36 AM

#12360

Iron Tamer

veteran

Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 2,971

you guys cried bush everytime we talked about obama and now you guys can't stand it when someone brings up that Obama was one of the worst presidents

classic

08-04-2017 , 11:41 AM

#12361

batair

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 16,802

Quote:

Originally Posted by JiggyMac

Bigotry in 2017 is: everyone who doesn't agree with a Leftist. Duh!

Everyone who does not agree with me is a leftist. Now define bigotry for me!!

08-04-2017 , 11:49 AM

#12362

spanktehbadwookie

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 19,374

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iron Tamer

you guys cried bush everytime we talked about obama and now you guys can't stand it when someone brings up that Obama was one of the worst presidents

classic

What? Who? Where?

08-04-2017 , 11:50 AM

#12363

spanktehbadwookie

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 19,374

Quote:

Originally Posted by batair

Everyone who does not agree with me is a leftist. Now define bigotry for me!!

Only all caps can make this better. Lmao.

08-04-2017 , 12:31 PM

#12364

jalfrezi

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 10,359

Quote:

Originally Posted by JiggyMac

Holy **** dude - why do we have to keep repeating this?

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/22/a...pagewanted=all

Bill Maher on the bathroom debate:
"When I say, “That’s not unreasonable” [to not want to share a bathroom with a transgender person] it’s because women have said that to me: “I want to know,” or “I’m not comfortable with someone in the bathroom, even if they, in their minds, have decided they are a woman.” Doesn’t that opinion count at all?"

Seattle Man in woman's locker room:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...room/80501904/

Your narrowly defined edge case isn't where it stops.

I'm barely aware of who Bill Maher is and couldn't care less what a TV personality has to say about it.

People should be able to use the toilets they feel most comfortable using. If some creep decides to take advantage of this by perving in women's toilets or groping them outside it, call the Philadelphia police department.

Last edited by jalfrezi; 08-04-2017 at 12:36 PM.

08-04-2017 , 12:41 PM

#12365

JiggyMac

old hand

Join Date: Apr 2014 Posts: 1,809

Quote:

Originally Posted by jalfrezi

Unlike you, a lot of people do 'consider' what people who reach very large audiences do have to say on subjects. Your personal anecdotes do not for laws make. Your opinions are relatively irrelevant.

As for your scenario - there was no LAW that could remove the gentleman in Seattle. He had every right to be there.
You call the police in Seattle and they do....what exactly?

This "man" has every "right" to use man's restroom (although I'd doubt they'd mind):

Perhaps you can't see the absurd, but then again the original position is absurd to being with.

08-04-2017 , 12:41 PM

#12366

13ball

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 12,912

Quote:

Originally Posted by JiggyMac

Dumb ****s like you are....well, just dumb ****s.

We can't all be pizzagate geniuses like yourself.

08-04-2017 , 01:34 PM

#12367

JiggyMac

old hand

Join Date: Apr 2014 Posts: 1,809

Quote:

Originally Posted by 13ball

We can't all be pizzagate geniuses like yourself.

No, you'd rather defend pedophiles, I understand.

*Note - your accusations will be met in kind.

08-04-2017 , 03:27 PM

#12368

Max Cut

Guest

Posts: n/a

Jiggy is soooo dishonest with his accusations it's probably ban-able. Also using "man" in quotes when referring to (presumably) a trans female.

Lastly, doesn't know that plural for man is men (man's restroom). Needs to update the Putinbot software dictionary.

08-04-2017 , 03:47 PM

#12369

microbet

Solar Powered

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 54,277

Quote:

Originally Posted by wil318466

I'm not bragging about anything. I'm telling you what would happen.

Your feelings hurt? You need a safe space from me saying I won't allow men in my daughters bathroom? Lol, you want me to be REALLY NICE to the people you deem drew the shortest straw in life?

Bahahahah. Don't be so emotional, child. There are other people I feel worse for than transgenders.

Of course. Trans people have drawn the short straw because they have to deal with people like you. Anytime they go to a restroom in public they have to decide which one is less likely to result in them getting assaulted.

08-04-2017 , 03:47 PM

#12370

TiltedDonkey

veteran

Join Date: Sep 2013 Posts: 2,975

Quote:

Originally Posted by chezlaw

Wil I'm giving you a 1 day timeout for going back to this and for effectively denying the existence of transgender by asserting that gender is fully determined by physical bits. I'm trying to give lots of leeway as it's an important topic but it has to take as a given that transgender people exist and are that they are not in fact men just because they have a penis.

I still disagree with this take. wil's posts do not deny the existence of transgender people; in fact, they explicitly acknowledge their existence in a number of places.

Saying a male-to-female transgender is not a woman is not equivalent to saying that they are not transgender.

Quote:

Originally Posted by chezlaw

I'm still asking fairly nicely as well as it's been such a common term but Wil (and everyone) it needs to stop.

This might be more suited for the mod thread, but I thought the PC thing was over. It's pretty obvious that posts calling something or someone "******ed" do not violate site-wide rules.

08-04-2017 , 03:55 PM

#12371

TiltedDonkey

veteran

Join Date: Sep 2013 Posts: 2,975

Quote:

Originally Posted by AllCowsEatGrass

or more likely you are thinking if you see someone in the women's room who looks like a man, you "call it like you see it" and physically assault them.

JiggyMac walks into women's room
JiggyMac looks in mirror
JiggyMac punches self

08-04-2017 , 04:01 PM

#12372

JiggyMac

old hand

Join Date: Apr 2014 Posts: 1,809

Quote:

Originally Posted by TiltedDonkey

JiggyMac walks into women's room
JiggyMac looks in mirror
JiggyMac punches self

I'm not the one who said I'd get violent with anyone. That was wil and microbet "calling it like he sees it".

Sigh.

08-04-2017 , 04:02 PM

#12373

chezlaw

Limey Bastard

Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 44,544

@Tilted, No but saying they are a man is effectively denying they are transgender.

'PC' has been retired because of issues with the name but the standard is not simply 'site rules'. The site allow a lot more than we do here. Best take it to the mod thread but briefly, although we've allowing a much greater volume and lack of content in personal attacks (yippee!), they still shouldn't be too objectionable.

08-04-2017 , 04:11 PM

#12374

JiggyMac

old hand

Join Date: Apr 2014 Posts: 1,809

Quote:

Originally Posted by chezlaw

Where does it stop though? If someone wants to say they're Napoleon and we deny that they are Napoleon no one is denying that they believe they're Napoleon?

What about anorexics? Just because they believe they're not damaging their health doesn't make it true.

I think I agree with Jordan Peterson here - denying that there is an issue impedes those who need help in dealing with their issues. They seem to be working against their own interests.